Comment on "Reissner-Nordström Black Holes in the Inverse Electrodynamics Model, [arXiv:1407.4383]"
aa r X i v : . [ g r- q c ] F e b Comment on ”Reissner-Nordstr¨om Black Holes in the Inverse ElectrodynamicsModel”.
S. Habib Mazharimousavi ∗ Department of Physics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences,Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus via Mersin 10, Turkey (Dated: March 1, 2021)Recently, the inverse electrodynamics model (IEM) was introduced and applied to fined Reissner-Nordstr¨om black holes in the context of the general relativity coupled minimally with the nonlinearelectrodynamics [1]. The solution consists of both electric and magnetic fields as of the dyonicsolutions. Here in this note, we show that the IEM model belongs to a more general class ofthe nonlinear electrodynamics with T = T µµ = 0. Here T νµ is the energy momentum tensor ofthe nonlinear electrodynamic Lagrangian. Naturally, such a dyonic RN black hole solution is thesolution for this general class. In their novel work [1], Cembranos, Cruz-Dombrizb and Jarillo have introduced the so called inverse electrodynamicsmodel (IEM) an alternative to the linear Maxwell theory. In their model the IEM Lagrangian density has beenproposed to be L ( X, Y ) = 14 π X " − η (cid:18) YX (cid:19) (1)in which X and Y are the Maxwell’s invariants expressed as X = 14 F µν F µν (2)and Y = 14 F µν F ∗ µν (3)with F µν = ∂ µ A ν − ∂ ν A µ the electromagnetic field and F ∗ µν its dual. To find the Reissner-Nordstr¨om [2] black holesin the gravity coupled with the IEM nonlinear electrodynamics, the action is chosen to be I = Z √− g (cid:20) R κ + L ( X, Y ) (cid:21) d x (4)in which κ = 8 πG. Variation of the action with respect to the metric tensor yields the Einstein’s field equations givenby ( G = c = 1) G νµ = 8 πT νµ (5)in which T νµ = ( L − Y L Y ) δ νµ − L X F µλ F νλ (6)and a sub-index stands for the partial derivative. To find a general class of the Lagrangian containing IEM, inthe sequel, we work with a generic Lagrangian density i.e., L ( X, Y ). Variation of the action with respect to theelectromagnetic four-potential leads to the non-linear Maxwell equations given by d ( L X F ∗ + L Y F ) = 0 (7)in which F = F µν dx µ ∧ dx ν and F ∗ = F ∗ µν dx µ ∧ dx ν are the electromagnetic field two-form and its dual. Following[1] we set F = E ( r ) dt ∧ dr − B ( r ) r sin θdθ ∧ dφ (8) ∗ Electronic address: [email protected] with its dual field given by F ∗ = − B ( r ) dt ∧ dr − E ( r ) r sin θdθ ∧ dφ. (9)The spherically symmetric line-element is considered to be ds = − λ ( r ) dt + 1 λ ( r ) dr + r d Ω (10)upon which the Maxwell invariants are obtained to be X = 12 (cid:0) B − E (cid:1) (11)and Y = EB. (12)The Bianchi identities i.e., d F = (13)imply B ( r ) = Pr (14)in which P is an integration constant. Following the magnetic field (14), the Maxwell nonlinear equation becomes d (cid:0) L X E ( r ) r + L Y P (cid:1) = 0 . (15)Next, we calculate the trace of the energy-momentum tensor which is given by T = T µµ = 1 π ( L − Y L Y − X L X ) . (16)and then set it to zero to obtain L − Y L Y − X L X = 0 (17)which is a nonlinear partial differential equation with respect to X and Y . The most general solution to (17) is derivedto be L ( X, Y ) = − π XL ( Z ) (18)in which Z = YX and L ( Z ) is an arbitrary function of Z. With the general solution (18) one easily finds that with L ( Z ) = 1 − ηZ the solution coincides with the IEM given in Eq. (1). Let’s continue with the general expression forthe Lagrangian density upon which the Maxwell equations(15) implies (cid:18) L − YX L ′ (cid:19) E ( r ) r + LP = C (19)in which C is an integration constant and a prime stands for the total derivative with respect to Z . Explicitly oneobtains Z = Er /P − E r /P which reveals that the latter equation is only a function of E ( r ) r . This in turn results in E ( r ) = Qr (20)in which Q is a constant satisfying the constraint( L ( Z ) − ZL ′ ( Z )) Q + L ( Z ) P = C (21)with Z = QPP − Q . We note that, having Z to be r − independent, both L and L ′ become r − independent and conse-quently the energy-momentum tensor is found to be T νµ = ξ πr diag [ − , − , ,
1] (22)where ξ = (cid:0) Q + P (cid:1) ( L ( Z ) − ZL ′ ( Z )) . (23)Eq. (22) suggests that the energy-momentum tensor of the general class of the Lagrangian (18) is conformal to theMaxwell linear theory such that (cid:0) T νµ (cid:1) (22) = Ω (cid:0) T νµ (cid:1) Maxwell (24)in which Ω = ( L ( Z ) − ZL ′ ( Z )) is the conformal factor.The tt -component of the Einstein’s field equation becomes rλ ′ − λr = − ξr (25)which admits the Reissner-Nordstr¨om black hole solution, i.e., λ ( r ) = 1 − Mr + ξr . (26)We note that, with P = 0 one simply finds Z = 0 and consequently ξ = Q L (0) , which implies that, L (0) = 1 . This fact can be seen clearly in the case of the IEM, where L = 1 − ηZ . To complete this study we investigate theleast energy conditions i.e., the weak energy conditions (WEC), which has to be satisfied by the energy-momentumtensor. For a perfect fluid type energy-momentum tensor with T νµ = diag [ − ρ, p, p, p ], WEC corresponds to ρ ≥ , and ρ + p ≥ . These conditions simplifies to ξ ≥ L ( Z ) − ZL ′ ( Z ) ≥ . Furthermore, with ξ ≥ ξ = (cid:0) Q + P (cid:1) (cid:0) ηZ (cid:1) which is positive definite if and only if η ≥ . Introducing q = ξ ≥ λ ( r ) = 1 − Mr + q r which possesses exactly the same properties as of the Reissner-Nordstr¨om black hole in the Einstein-Maxwell theory.In conclusion, we reconsidered the IEM model of nonlinear electrodynamics introduced in [1]. It has been shownthat, IEM model belongs to a general class of nonlinear electrodynamics admitting the trace of the correspondingenergy-momentum tensor zero. The general expression of the model has been explicitly obtained as of Eq. (18). Itis worth to mention that, in [4] and [5], similar formalism has been developed through introducing the conformallyinvariant Maxwell source in the context of different forms for the Maxwell’s invariants. However, the idea of theconformal nonlinear electrodynamics and the traceless energy-momentum tensor have been known earlier in theworks of Cataldo et al. [6] and Hassaine and Martinez [7]. Finally, we would like to mention the two very recentworks which investigate the NED theory preserving both conformal invariance and SO (2) duality-rotation invariance[8]. [1] J. A. R. Cembranos, ´A. de la Cruz-Dombriz and J. Jarillo, JCAP
042 (2015): arXiv:1407.4383;J. A. R. Cembranos, ´A. de la Cruz-Dombriz and J. Jarillo, Universe , 412 (2015).[2] H. Reissner, Ann. Phys. (Leipz.) , 106 (1916);G. Nordstr¨om, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. , 1238 (1918).[3] M. E. Rodrigues, E. L.B. Juniora and M. V. de S. Silva JCAP