Fabrication technology for high light-extraction ultraviolet thin-film flip-chip (UV TFFC) LEDs grown on SiC
Burhan K. SaifAddin, Abdullah Almogbel, Christian J. Zollner, Humberto Foronda, Ahmed Alyamani, Abdulrahman Albadri, Michael Iza, Shuji Nakamura, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck
SSST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018) Fabrication technology for high light-extraction ultraviolet thin-film flip-chip (UV TFFC) LEDs grown on SiC
Burhan K. SaifAddin , Abdullah Almogbel , Christian J. Zollner , Humberto Foronda , Ahmed Alyamani , Abdulrahman Albadri , Michael Iza , Shuji Nakamura , Steven P. DenBaars and James S. Speck Materials Department, UCSB, CA 93106, USA Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCSB, CA 93106, USA King Abdulaziz City of Science and Technology (KACST), Saudi Arabia *[email protected]
Abstract
The light output of deep ultraviolet (UV-C) AlGaN light-emitting diodes (LEDs) is limited due to their poor light extraction efficiency (LEE). To improve the LEE of AlGaN LEDs, we developed a fabrication technology to process AlGaN LEDs grown on SiC into thin-film flip-chip LEDs (TFFC LEDs) with high LEE. This process transfers the AlGaN LED epi onto a new substrate by wafer-to-wafer bonding, and by removing the absorbing SiC substrate with a highly selective SF plasma etch that stops at the AlN buffer layer. We optimized the inductively coupled plasma (ICP) SF etch parameters to develop a substrate-removal process with high reliability and precise epitaxial control, without creating micromasking defects or degrading the health of the plasma etching system. The SiC etch rate by SF plasma was ~46 µm/hr at a high RF bias (400 W), and ~7 µm/hr at a low RF bias (49 W) with very high etch selectivity between SiC and AlN. The high SF etch selectivity between SiC and AlN was essential for removing the SiC substrate and exposing a pristine, smooth AlN surface. We demonstrated the epi-transfer process by fabricating high light extraction TFFC LEDs from AlGaN LEDs grown on SiC. To further enhance the light extraction, the exposed N-face AlN was anisotropically etched in dilute KOH. The LEE of the AlGaN LED improved by ~3X after KOH roughening at room temperature. This AlGaN TFFC LED process establishes a viable path to high external quantum efficiency (EQE) and power conversion efficiency (PCE) UV-C LEDs. Keywords: epi-transfer and heterogeneous integration technology, deep ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (UV-C LEDs), UV TFFC LEDs, light sources, light extraction efficiency, AlGaN, AlN, semiconductor devices. Introduction
AlGaN ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (UV LEDs) and ultraviolet laser diodes (UV LDs) in the range of 265–280 nm are needed to develop novel disinfection and sterilizing technologies (water, air, and surfaces) to improve access to clean water [1–4], improve public health [5,6], and enable other biotech applications [7–10]. UV LEDs are a viable technology for replacing mercury gas discharge lamps in disinfection and biotechnology applications [11–18]. Hospitals, for example, reduced the rates of hospital-acquired drug-resistant infections by 25% using ultraviolet disinfection (via mercury lamps (254 nm)), as reported by various clinical trials [19,20]. Furthermore, the AlN or AlGaN epi-transfer
ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
2 and heterogeneous integration technology can be employed to enhance the performance of photodiodes (PDs) [21], high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) [22,23], bulk acoustic resonators (BARs) [24–26], and high-aspect-ratio SiC microstructures and devices [27–30]. Researchers developing AlGaN LEDs have made significant progress in the last 30 years [11,18,31–44]; however, the technology is limited by light extraction efficiency (LEE) [45–54]. The LEE of AlGaN LEDs is less than that of InGaN blue LEDs for five main reasons. First, the absence of a transparent current spreading layer over p-GaN, such as indium tin oxide (ITO) for blue LEDs, requires the use of flip-chip (FC) LEDs architecture with a highly-reflective p-side down. Second, the poor conductivity of Mg-doped AlGaN necessitates the use of an optically absorbing p + -GaN layer for hole injection into the Mg-doped AlGaN and the formation of an ohmic p-contact; GaN has an absorption coefficient of 1.5x10 cm -1 at 275 nm [55]. Third, the reflectivity of ohmic p-contacts, is limited to ~70-80% , in the 265-280 nm range. Fourth, the light from the AlGaN MQW emitters at these wavelengths is ~40% transverse magnetic (TM) polarized [47,48,56–58], which propagates laterally; finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) calculations estimate that the extraction of TM emission is >10X less efficient than transverse electric (TE) polarization in typical volumetric FC LEDs [48] (in volumetric FC LEDs light has to travel through the transparent growth substrate) [48]. Lastly, the encapsulants used to enhance LEE in blue LEDs suffer low transparency, poor stability, and a low refractive index in deep ultraviolet LEDs [59–63]. The most commonly employed substrates for AlGaN UV-C LEDs are sapphire and AlN but they yield LEDs with low LEE. Although sapphire substrates are transparent, their thermal conductivity is limited, and they lack efficient ways to extract TM polarization because roughening the sidewalls of sapphire LEDs dies is challenging [46]. AlN substrates grown by physical vapor transport (PVT) are limited by an absorption around 264 nm (4.7 eV) with an absorption coefficient of about ~35 cm -1 [64] whereas hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE) grown AlN substrates have less absorption (~10 cm -1 ) [65]. Researchers have largely overlooked AlGaN LEDs grown on SiC substrates [66–74] because SiC absorbs strongly below its optical bandgap (3.2 eV and 3.0 eV for 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC, respectively), but this disadvantage can be overcome with a novel thin-film flip-chip (TFFC) LED architecture in which the SiC is removed with a highly selective SF chemical plasma etch between SiC and AlN. Growing AlN on SiC substrates is promising due to their similar crystallographic structure, polarity, chemical stability, and low lattice mismatch (0.8%) [75–80]. AlN grown on SiC with low threading dislocations has been demonstrated with MOCVD [78,81] and plasma-assisted MBE [71,76]. Furthermore, we demonstrate in this paper that AlGaN LEDs grown on SiC can be processed into thin-film LEDs with high LEE [82–85]; for example, FDTD simulations by Ryu et al. show that TM emission’s LEE in textured thin-film LEDs is significantly higher (>6X) than in volumetric AlGaN FC-LEDs [48]. InGaN thin-film blue LEDs were developed with very high LEE using laser lift-off for substrate removal, N-face GaN KOH photoelectrochemical (PEC) roughening, and a p-side reflective mirror [86–88]. Several methods for laser lift-off of AlGaN UV-C LEDs ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
3 have been developed [89–94]; however, laser-induced melting of the Al in the dislocated interface of the AlN buffer layer in AlGaN LEDs causes more cracks than laser lift-off of the GaN buffer layer in InGaN LEDs [95] because the Al melts at 660 °C, whereas Ga melts at 30 °C [91]. Employing PEC etching to lift-off thin-film LEDs from their growth substrates [70,71] is more difficult with AlN than with GaN because N-face AlN etches anisotropically in KOH (without above-bandgap light assistance) considerably faster (~20x) than N-face GaN does [98]. Thus, KOH roughening can damage the active region before the lateral lift-off etch is completed. In this paper, we demonstrate a process to fabricate high extraction efficiency TFFC LEDs grown on SiC. We characterize SiC and AlN etching using inductively coupled plasma (ICP) SF plasma. The SF gas flow, process pressure, and sample RF bias power were investigated to determine first-order trends between the etch parameters and the etch rates of SiC and AlN. Next, the etch parameters were optimized to develop a highly reliable SiC substrate-removal process with no micromasking defects and precise epitaxial control, without degrading the plasma etching system health. A highly selective SF etch between SiC and AlN (90:1) was achieved which was essential for removing the SiC substrate and exposing a smooth AlN surface (roughness ~0.6 nm). We demonstrate high LEE thin-film flip chip (TFFC) AlGaN LEDs grown on SiC. We compare the power output of TFFC AlGaN LEDs before and after KOH roughening of the exposed AlN surface. The AlGaN LED’s LEE improved by ~3X after roughening in KOH [0.25 M] for 70 sec at room temperature. SiC substrate thinning characteristics
AlN was grown on quartered 2-inch 6H-SiC substrates (SiCrystal AG) by MOCVD as described elsewhere [81]. A one-step lapping process was used to thin the SiC substrates after bonding them to a carrier with high thermal conductivity (4.9 W/cm a-plane, 3.9 W/cm c-plane) with n- and p- bonding pads using Au/Au thermocompression bonding [73,74]. The SiC based samples were mounted episide-down on a 2-inch stainless-steel chuck using a wax (that melts at 120 °C), which provides mechanical adhesion during lapping. The lapping process was performed using South Bay Technologies multipurpose lapping system (Model 920). The SiC growth substrates were thinned from 250 µm to 75 µm by lapping with a 9 µm Dia-Grid Diamond Disc (Allied High Tech Products, Inc.). The water-cooled lapping tool had a lapping rate of 29 µm/hr using 9 µm grit diamond discs. A summary of the thinning parameters is shown in Table 1. The lapping damage generated by lapping with a 9 µm grit was approximately 3 x 9 µm = 27 µm, which avoids damage to the active region. The mechanical lapping yields a total thickness variation (TTV) of about 15–20 µm across a quartered 2-inch wafer. SF etch chemistry characteristics The SiC substrates were plasma etched in a Panasonic ICP etching system (E6261) using SF plasma [67,68,101–103]. ICP etching systems have independent ICP and RF bias sources. The ICP plasma (generated by a current flowing in a planner coil above the etch chamber) power controls the ions and radicals densities. The RF bias power controls ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
4 the ions bombardment energy and thus is proportional to sputter (physical) etching. The samples were mounted episide-down on a 6-inch carrier wafer using a vacuum diffusion pump fluid, which provides thermal conduction between the sample and the carrier wafer. The sample surface temperature depends on the lower electrode temperature and on the plasma ions’ energies and densities. The lower electrode of the ICP system was backside cooled by pressurized He, and the carrier wafer temperature was kept at 11 °C during all etches. The 6-inch carrier wafer was a 1.5 mm thick fused silica wafer with a 100 nm Al backside coating to hold the fused silica carrier wafer to the electrostatic chuck. The chamber and carrier wafer were cleaned in O plasma and then seasoned with a 2 min SF etch at 1000 W ICP power and low RF bias (49 W). We found that chamber and carrier wafer seasoning suppressed the formation of SiC pillars. The SiC etch rates were determined by profilometry (Dektak) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Etching SiC with SF plasma produces the volatile products SiF SiF , CF and CF [104]; the absence of etch-induced polymer generation renders the long etching (for several hours, if needed) consistent and reliable. Thus, long SF etching does not need to be interrupted to clean the etch chamber because the etch chemistry does not cause polymer accumulation. However, the carrier wafer’s temperature in the ICP etch chamber should be controlled during long etches because elevated temperatures can increase the SiC etch rate. We developed a two step SF ICP etch process to remove SiC: (1) high SiC etch rate process; (2) high selectivity SiC:AlN etch process. The two-step etch parameters are summarized in Table 2. To achieve the highest etch rates of bulk SiC, we observed SiC etch rate as a function of SF flow and process pressure. Figure 1(a) shows that the SiC etch rate increased as SF flow increased, with improved etch uniformity. Figure 1(b) shows that the etch rate was sensitive to the process pressure. Increasing the process pressure, increases the ions’ densities but decreases the ions’ energies, by decreasing its mean free path. The SiC etch rate data in figure 2(b) shows that a chamber pressure of 1.33 Pa resulted in the highest SiC etch rate at the following process parameters: 1000 W ICP power, 400 W RF bias power, and 50 sccm SF flow. To achieve high etch selectivity, we utilized the fact that SiC etches chemically in SF , whereas AlN does not etch chemically in SF and is only etched at a low rate by SF sputter etching (at low RF bias). Figure 2(a) shows that the SiC etch rate increased as the RF bias power increased. At high RF bias power, SF sputter etch dominates whereas at low RF bias (below 60 W), SF chemical etch dominates and the sputter etch rate for SiC and AlN is very low. The etch rate at 400 W was about ~40 µm/hr when measured over 40 min and 46 µm/hr when measured over 2 hr. The SiC substrate was etched first at ~46 µm/hr over 1.2 hr to remove about 60 µm of SiC; the temperature of the He-cooled carrier wafer increased slightly from 11 °C to 15 °C. Achieving higher SiC etch rate is possible in plasma etch systems that have higher ICP power and RF bias power. ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
5 Figure 2(b) shows that the SiC:AlN etch selectivity was very sensitive to RF bias, especially below 60 W. . At high RF bias, the etch selectivity was low (10:1 at 400 W) because at this regime, sputter etching has low selectivity between SiC and AlN. On the other hand, the SiC:AlN etch selectivity increased significantly as the RF bias decreased below 60 W, where the SF chemically etches SiC but does not etch AlN due to the formation of the low-volatility species AlF , which was demonstrated previously in studies of selective reactive ion etching of GaAs on AlGaAs and GaP on AlGaP in fluorine containing plasma [105–108]. However, the strong dependence of the SiC:AlN etch selectivity on the RF bias power decreased when the RF bias power was less than 47 W, as the SiC etch rate decreased more than the AlN etch rate did. SiC:AlN etch selectivity is essential for removing the SiC substrate without damaging the active layer by stopping at the AlN buffer layer with precise epitaxial control. The etch selectivity was dependent on the substrate temperature (maintained at 11 °C), process pressure, and the RF bias power, especially in the 47–49 W region. For a thinned, quartered 2-inch SiC substrate with ~15–20 µm in TTV, a SiC:AlN etch selectivity of 90:1 at 49 W RF bias and 1.33 Pa was sufficient to reliably and selectively etch SiC and expose a pristine surface of N-face AlN. At a lower process pressure of 0.8 Pa, the SiC:AlN etch selectivity increased to 150:1. This indicates that the selectivity can be increased further by optimizing the process pressure. Senesky et al. [27] reported an SF etch selectivity (at a low RF bias) of 16:1 (SiC:AlN) using AlN deposited with reactive sputtering; the higher bulk SiC etch selectivities obtained with MOCVD-grown AlN (at a low RF bias) indicate that AlN grown by MOCVD could replace Ni as a hard mask in fabricating high-aspect-ratio SiC microstructures and devices [28,29]. We optimized the SF ICP etch to ensure that it removed the thick SiC substrate without producing micromasking defects on the thin-film LEDs surface and without degrading the plasma etching system health. First, we avoided the use of commonly used metal carriers inside the etch chamber (refer to Table 3). In ICP plasma etch systems, SF etching is typically performed using a 6-inch Ni or Al carrier wafer because: both have low etch rates in SF [101,109], as shown in Table 3. However, the use of metal carrier wafers increases micro-masking defects (which produces 40+ µm SiC pillars, as shown in figure 3(a)) that will not etch completely, even with the selective etch. Furthermore, sputtered metal from metal carriers can affect subsequent etches or cause electrical shorting [27], and require manual cleaning of the etch chamber after every etch. The use of fused silica (SiO ) or sapphire carrier wafers minimized the micro-masking defects (SiC pillars) on the etched surface and did not affect the ICP etch chamber walls. The suppression of SiC pillars is shown in SEM images in figure 3(b). Selective etching of a SiC surface with suppressed micromasking defects exposed a smooth AlN surface (refer to figure 4(e) for an AFM scan of the exposed AlN surface with RMS roughness < 1 nm) that was free of SiC pillars, as shown in the optical and SEM micrographs of the TFFC LEDs in figure 5. Some literature indicates that the etch pressure requires optimization to remove SiC pillars; however, we found that pillar formation can be suppressed with appropriate selection of the carrier wafer, combined with the seasoning of both the carrier wafer and the etch chamber. ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
4. TFFC UV-C LED (278 nm) demonstration
The thin-film transfer technology was demonstrated on a high LEE TFFC UV-C LED, as shown in figures 4-6. Figure 4 shows the process flow to fabricate TFFC LEDs from LED grown on SiC. The AlGaN LED structure was first grown on a quartered 2-inch 6H-SiC substrate (SiCrystal AG) by MOCVD as reported elsewhere [85]. The LED structure is shown in figure 6(a) and consisted of AlN (3.2 μm), Al Ga N (180 nm), n-Al Ga N (1.1 μm), 278 nm MQWs 4x(Al Ga N/ Al Ga N), p-Al Ga N (50 nm), and p-GaN (5 nm). The samples were cleaved into 1.1 x 1.1 cm samples and were processed into LEDs. The n-contact was V/Al/V/Au (20/80/20/200 nm); the p-contact was unannealed Ni/Al/Ni/Au (1/150/100/1000 nm) (refer to [85] for details). After a 3 min solvent clean and 30 sec O plasma clean (100 W), the LEDs were bonded to a thermally conductive substrate (semi-insulating 4H-SiC, Cree, Inc.) with n- and p- bonding pads (20/1500 nm Ti/Au were deposited by e-beam). The samples were bonded using low-temperature Au/Au thermocompression bonding. A Finetech flip-chip bonder (FINEPLACER lambda) was employed for aligned wafer-to-wafer bonding. The bond was performed at 30 N/cm for 5 min at 275 °C in air. Then, the samples were bonded further in custom-designed graphite fixtures that applied ~300 N/cm pressure while the sample was annealed at 200 °C for 2 hr in air (the pressure was maintained during a 5 min cooldown); refer to Table 4 for a summary of the low-temperature Au/Au thermocompression bonding parameters. The 6H-SiC growth substrate was lapped mechanically to 75 µm and removed by a two-step SF plasma etch, as previously described. Figure 5(a) shows plain-view optical micrograph images of processed UV LEDs with partially exposed AlN during an etch interrupt. The exposed TFFC LEDs had no visible cracks or chipping. The complete removal of SiC and exposure of pristine AlN surface was visible to the eye — a colorful interference pattern was observed as the light incident, and reflected from different surfaces in the TFFC LED interferes [110]. Also, the wettability of the surface changed as the N-face AlN was exposed. Namely, the surface of the etched carbon-face SiC was hydrophilic, and the surface of the exposed AlN was hydrophobic, as shown in figure 5(a). The TFFC LED contacts design is shown in figure 5(b) which shows a 5-finger topology for p-contact, surrounded by n-contact, with p-contact area of 0.093 mm . The 5-finger p-contact topology was adopted to avoid current crowding in the n-AlGaN layer [111], which had a relatively high resistivity (~60 mΩ-cm ). After complete removal of the SiC growth substrate, the suspended AlN/AlGaN/n-AlGaN thin-film in-between the TFFC LEDs, which is above the n- and p-pads (as shown in figure 5(b)), can be removed via a patterned hard mask (SiO ) and KOH, or by etching a wider and deeper mesa around the LEDs mesa (into 80% of the AlN thickness) — before FC bonding. However, we relied on the residual tensile stress in the AlN/AlGaN/n-AlGaN film, which caused it to slightly concave upward [98]. Thus, after the TFFC LEDs were singulated, the n- and p- pads becomes accessible to wire bonding, as shown in figure 5(c). The TFFC LEDs were singulated by mechanical sawing using an ADT 7100 Dicing Saw. The TFFC LEDs were covered by photoresist for protection from the cooling/cleaning water jets that are needed during mechanical sawing. Subsequently, the TFFC LEDs were ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
7 mounted on TO headers using a Ni-Au epoxy from Dexerials Corp., and the light output of the LEDs was measured in a 75 mm integrating sphere (Digital Instruments, Inc.). Figure 6(b) compares the dependence a TFFC LED’s light output power (L) on the injected DC current (I) before and after optimized KOH roughening of the exposed AlN surface [85]. The slope of the power versus current increased by ~3X after KOH roughening of the exposed AlN layer in dilute KOH (0.25 M) for 70 sec (refer to the bird’s-eye-view SEM image of the resulting hexagonal pyramids in figure 6(c)). The LEE enhancement after KOH roughening was limited to ~3X (as estimated from the enhancement in the L-I slope) due to the limited p-contact reflectivity and the use of a 5 nm p + -GaN layer (a strongly absorbing layer) to inject holes into the LED active region. Further LEE enhancement is possible without using p-GaN and by using a more reflective p-contacts. For example, the photoluminescence (PL) of MQW wells in an n-i-n structure (n-Al Ga N/286-nm-MQWs/n-Al Ga N/Al
GaN/AlN) could be enhanced by ~3.9X [112] after KOH roughening by using a highly reflective p-contact (a Pt/Al/Ni/Au p-contact with a Pt thickness of 0.26 nm and reflectivity of 90% at 286 nm was used to produce a ~3.9X intensity enhancement in PL after KOH roughening). The LEE of TM emissions in KOH-roughened TFFC LEDs are expected to be higher than in bulk FC LEDs. For example, Lee et al. studies on LEE in AlGaN UV LEDs [113] showed that LEE from a PSS sapphire AlGaN LED die was limited by sidewall roughness, more so than in InGaN-based bulk FC LEDs, and that LEE from sidewalls is significant in thick (e.g., 300 m thick sapphire) bulk FC AlGaN LED but becomes negligible in relatively thin bulk FC AlGaN LEDs (e.g., 90 m thick sapphire). However, in TFFC LEDs, the contribution of sidewall emissions is negligible because the thin-film LED widths are much larger than its thickness, which is only 2–3 µm, and both TE and TM light emission couple into the roughened AlN surface; for example, FDTD simulations by Ryu et al. showed that the LEE of TM emission in roughened AlGaN thin-film LEDs is significantly higher (>6X) than in bulk AlGaN FC-LEDs [48]. The TE/TM emissions ratio depends on the MQWs strain and the Al composition in the wells and barriers [114–116]. We speculate that the strain state of the MQWs grown on SiC will be similar to MQWs grown on sapphire because (1) the AlN buffer layer is normally relaxed in both sapphire and SiC substrates, and therefore the AlGaN MQWs are similarly compressively strained by the AlN lattice; and (2) the piezoelectric component due to thermal coefficient of expansion (TCE) mismatch (compressive in sapphire, and slightly tensile in SiC) between the AlN and AlGaN layers is negated because it affects them similarly. Estimating the LEE in unroughened thin-film LEDs could be challenging. For example, thin-film blue LEDs with KOH-roughened GaN buffer layers, ray tracing simulations estimate 13 % LEE for each single-pass extraction (6 bounces for full extraction) [117], whereas wave optics simulations estimate 31% LEE for each single-pass extraction (3 bounces for full extraction) [118]. We will discuss our estimates for the LEE of TFFC LEDs in a future publication. After the optimized KOH roughening, the LED CW power was 7.8 mW at 95 mA, emitting at 278.5 nm, which yielded an EQE of 2%. Stable encapsulation [61] can further enhance ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
8 the LEE from TFFC LEDs; however, most resins absorb strongly below 330 nm and decompose over time, which renders them commercially unviable. A higher LEE for AlGaN TFFC LEDs is also achievable if the p-GaN layer is replaced with a transparent hole injector [119–121] or if the reflectivity of the p- and n-metal contacts is increased [48,117,122,123]. The IV characteristics do not change with KOH etching as discussed in details elsewhere [98] (refer to Figure 6c); however, in the device discussed here the voltage increased by ~ 1V after 50 sec KOH etching (refer to Figure 6d) which was probably due to a crack in the TFFC LED; however, further KOH etching did not affect the IV.
5. Conclusions
We developed a highly selective SF plasma etch of SiC over AlN and a viable manufacturing method for epitaxial transfer from SiC to another substrate via wafer bonding and SiC substrate-removal by SF etching. Then, we demonstrated it on UV-C LEDs that were grown on SiC to fabricate high LEE TFFC LEDs. The SiC substrate was bonded via Au-Au thermocompression bonding to another n- and p-patterned thermally conductive substrate. The growth substrate was removed by a two-step ICP etching without micromasking defects on the etched surface. The first step was a high SiC etch rate (~46 μm/hr) at a high RF bias power (400 W). The second step was a selective SiC etch rate (~7 μm/hr) at a low RF bias power ( 49 W), with an etch selectivity of SiC:AlN ~90:1 at a process pressure of 1.33 Pa; higher SiC:AlN etch selectivity of ~150:1 was also achieved at a lower process pressure. The highly selective SF etch at low bias was essential for removing all SiC by reliably stopping at the LEDs’ AlN buffer layer, which acts as an etch stop layer. We demonstrated a TFFC manufacturing method for UV-C LEDs that were grown on SiC. The LEE was significantly enhanced via KOH roughening of the exposed N-face AlN. KOH roughening enhanced the LEE by ~3X for UV LEDs without encapsulation and despite the use of 5 nm p-GaN as a p-contact layer. Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), the Technology Innovations Center (TIC) program, and the KACST-KAUST-UCSB Solid State Lighting Program. The authors are appreciative of the support of the Solid State Lighting and Energy Electronics Center (SSLEEC) at UCSB. A portion of this work was conducted in the UCSB nanofabrication facility and part of the NSF NNIN network (ECS-0335765), as well as the UCSB MRL, which is supported by the NSF MRSEC Program (DMR05-20415). The authors acknowledge the UCSB-Collaborative Research in Engineering, Science and Technology (CREST) Malaysia project. This work was also supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (Grant No. 1650114). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and may not reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would also like to thank the cleanroom staff at UCSB nanofabrication facility, especially Brian Thibault for helpful discussions.
ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
List of Figures (a) Bulk SiC etch rate (µm/hr) vs SF flow rate (sccm). Higher flow rate increases the etch rate and improves the lateral etch uniformity. (b) Bulk SiC etch rate (µm/hr) vs pressure (Pa). The etch rate peaks at 1.33 Pa when the product of the ions’ energies and the ion densities is maximum. Figure 1.
The SF flow and process pressure, were examined to determine the trends between the etch parameters to optimize for a high SiC etch rate. The process parameters were fixed at 1000 W ICP, 400 RF bias, and SF
50 sccm flow. The etch rates were measured for bulk SiC over a period of ~40 min – on a fused silica carrier wafer. (a) Bulk SiC etch rate (µm/hr) vs RF bias (W). (b) SiC:AlN etch selectivity as function of RF bias power (W).
Figure 2.
In figure 2(a), at high RF bias, the SiC etch rate was dominated by sputter etching, however, at low RF bias sputter etch rate is minimal, and SiC is primarily chemically etched. Figure 2(b) shows that SiC:AlN etch selectivity has a strong dependence on RF bias below 60 W. The SiC:AlN etch selectivity at 49 W RT bias was 90:1 during a 2 hr etch, however, the selectivity decreased below 47 W. A higher SiC:AlN etch selectivity 150:1 (shown in red) was measured at a lower process pressure (0.8 Pa).
ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
Table 1.
Summary of lapping parameters used to mechanically thin SiC substrate with 9 µm diamond grid disc.
Lapping settings Lapping etch rate
CCW 5 wafer rotation/ min 6 pad rotation /min 25-30 µm/min
Table 2.
Summary of etch parameters for the two-steps ICP SF etch to selectively remove SiC (using fused silica as a carrier). Process parameter Fast SiC etch Selective SiC etch (slow)
Pressure 1.33 Pa 1.33 Pa ICP power 1000 W 1000 W SF Flow 50 sccm 50 sccm ICP bias 400 W 49 W Etch rate 40 µm/hr (40 min) 46 µm/hr (90 min) 47 µm/hr (2 hr) ~7 µm/hr (2 hr) SiC:AlN Selectivity 10:1 ~90:1 (~150:1 at 0.8 Pa) Impact on SiC surface Rough hydrophilic SiC surface After SiC is completely etched, the surface changes from hydrophilic to hydrophobic; smooth N-face AlN surface (RMS roughness < 1 nm) is exposed.
Table 3.
Summary of the etch rate, and selectivity of SiC and various 6-inch carrier wafers used in the ICP system (at 1000 W ICP, 400 W RF bias, 1.33 Pa).
6” Carrier wafer Etch rate (µm/hr) SiC:Carrier wafer etch selectivity at 400 W RF bias Cost Comments
SiC 40 1:1 $1000 -- Satisfactory selectivity but expensive. Satisfactory selectivity and inexpensive. Sapphire 5 8:1 $400 Fused Silica 20 1.9:1 $30 Al wafer 1.5-2 25:1 $200 Sputter into sample and etch chamber walls Ni wafer 1 40:1 $200 Sputter into sample and etch chamber walls. Cu film on Si wafer NA NA NA Sputter contaminating and nonvolatile etch byproducts into sample and etch chamber walls Ni film on Si wafer 1 40:1 NA Sputter into sample and etch chamber walls. Also, Ni films thicker than 2 µm buckle and delaminate due to high compressive stress.
ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
Table 4.
Summary for Au-Au thermo-compression bonding characteristics with Finetech flip-chip bonder.
Bonding type Temperature and Force
Sample size
Au-Au thermo-compression bonding To minimize p-mirror damage: 1-275 ºC, 5 min (30 N/cm ) 2- 200 ºC, 2 hr (300 N/cm with graphite fixture) 0.3x0.3 cm to 1.5x1.5 cm (a) (b) Figure 3.
SiC pillars can be completely removed from the surface if appropriate process controls are applied. The image on the left (a) shows SiC pillars (40+ µm mircomasking defects) that can form during etching and that will not be completely etched even when the highly selective etch is subsequently applied. The SiC pillars formation was suppressed as shown on the right (b) by an optimized etch and process controls: 1) Metal carrier wafers were avoided (fused silica carrier was employed). 2) The carrier wafer and etch chamber were seasoned with SF plasma prior to etching. ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018) (a) UV LED grown on SiC (b) wafer-to-wafer FC bonding (c) thinning and etching of SiC with selective SF plasma (d) TFFC LED singulation and KOH roughening (e) AFM image of the surface of exposed AlN surface as (roughness ~0.6 nm) after complete etching of SiC in step (c). (f) Cross-sectional SEM image of nano-sharp hexagonal pyramids that are produced after KOH roughening of N-face AlN in step (d). Figure 4.
Process flow (a-d) demonstrate UV-C thin-film flip-chip (TFFC) grown on SiC and (e) shows AFM of exposed AlN surface after completing SiC growth substrate-removal in step (c). The hexagonal pyramids shown in (f) expand the effective angle of the light-extraction-cones. Figure adapted, with permission, from Ref. [85].
ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018) (a) Differential interference contrast (DIC) micrograph shows eight TFFC LEDs during an etch stop before the substrate is completely etched by the SF plasma. In the top four LEDs, a thin layer of SiC remained. In the bottom four LEDs, no SiC remained and the N-face AlN was exposed. The colorful fringes in the lower four LEDs were due to thinfilm interference. (b) Optical micrograph of UV-C TFFC LED (278 nm). (c) SEM image of a packaged UV-C TFFC LED (278 nm). Figure 5.
Optical microscope micrographs of a processed thin film LED (5-finger topology) with no cracks or chipping in the active region in (a) and (b). After dicing, the suspended AlN/AlGaN/n-AlGaN between the TFFC LEDs concave up due to residual tensile stresses in the AlN/AlGaN/n-AlGaN film which renders the n- and p- pads accessible as shown in (c). ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018) (a) 278 nm LED structure on SiC. The TDD was ~1x10 cm -2 in the AlN buffer and AlGaN layers. (b) The light-current (L-I) curve before, and after KOH roughening. The enhancement in the L-I slope KOH roughening was ~ 200%. The area of the p-contact (Ni/Al/Ni/Au) was 0.093 mm ~0.1 mm . (c) The voltage-current (I-V) curve before, and after KOH roughening, for a 298 nm TFFC LED. The inset shows a 298 nm EL spectrum at 60 mA with FWHM of 12.7 nm. The area of the p-contact (Ni/Al/Ni/Au) was 0.013 mm . (d) The voltage-current (I-V) curve before, and after KOH roughening, for the 278 nm TFFC LED. The inset shows a 278.5 nm EL spectrum at 95 mA with FWHM of 10 nm. The DC power was 7.6 mW at 95 mA. Figure 6.
TFFC LEDs demonstration had high LEE. The LEE was enhanced significantly via KOH roughening of the exposed N-face AlN layer of TFFC LED. The L-I slope increased by ~3X with optimized KOH roughening without encapsulation, and despite using 5 nm p-GaN as p-contact layer.
ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
References [1] Lui G Y, Roser D, Corkish R, Ashbolt N J and Stuetz R 2016 Point-of-use water disinfection using ultraviolet and visible light-emitting diodes
Sci. Total Environ.
Water Res. Water Res.
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Lancet Glob. Heal. e316–23 [6] Reygadas F, Gruber J S, Ray I and Nelson K L 2015 Field efficacy evaluation and post-treatment contamination risk assessment of an ultraviolet disinfection and safe storage system Water Res. J. Appl. Microbiol.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health [9] Bolton J R and Linden K G 2003 Standardization of Methods for Fluence (UV Dose) Determination in Bench-Scale UV Experiments J. Environ. Eng.
Environ. Eng. Sci. Semicond. Sci. Technol. Electron. Commun. Japan Nat. Photonics Light, Energy and the Environement 2015 (Washington, D.C.: OSA) p DM2D.4 [16] Kneissl M, Kolbe T, Chua C, Kueller V, Lobo N, Stellmach J, Knauer A, Rodriguez H, Einfeldt S, Yang Z, Johnson N M and Weyers M 2011 Advances in group III-nitride-based deep UV light-emitting diode technology
Semicond. Sci. Technol. ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
Performance characteristics of UV-C AlGaN-based lasers grown on sapphire and bulk AlN substrates
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. [18] Kneissl M and Rass J
III-nitride ultraviolet emitters : technology and applications [19] Pegues D A, Han J, Gilmar C, McDonnell B and Gaynes S 2017 Impact of Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation for No-Touch Terminal Room Disinfection on Clostridium difficile Infection Incidence Among Hematology-Oncology Patients
Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. Am. J. Infect. Control Photodiodes - From Fundamentals to Applications ed I Yun (InTech) [22] Lu B and Palacios T 2010 High Breakdown (>1500 V) AlGaN/GaN HEMTs by Substrate-Transfer Technology
IEEE Electron Device Lett. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. (IEEE) pp 16–9 [25] Chen G, Zhao X, Wang X, Jin H, Li S, Dong S, Flewitt A J, Milne W I and Luo J K 2015 Film bulk acoustic resonators integrated on arbitrary substrates using a polymer support layer Sci. Rep. Nano Lett. (IEEE) pp 352–5 [28] Luna L E, Tadjer M J, Anderson T J, Imhoff E A, Hobart K D and Kub F J 2017 Dry Etching of High Aspect Ratio 4H-SiC Microstructures ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. P207–10 [29] Dowling K M, Ransom E H and Senesky D G 2017 Profile Evolution of High Aspect Ratio Silicon Carbide Trenches by Inductive Coupled Plasma Etching
J. Microelectromechanical Syst. /O plasma etching J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. J. Cryst. Growth
Science
Appl. Phys. Lett.
Appl. Phys. Express ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018) [35] Shatalov M, Sun W, Lunev A, Hu X, Dobrinsky A, Bilenko Y, Yang J, Shur M, Gaska R, Moe C, Garrett G and Wraback M 2012 AlGaN Deep-Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes with External Quantum Efficiency above 10%
Appl. Phys. Express Appl. Phys. Express Semiconductors and Semimetals vol 96 pp 85–120 [38] Asif Khan M, Shatalov M, Maruska H P, Wang H M and Kuokstis E 2005 III–Nitride UV Devices
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. J. Cryst. Growth
Rep. Prog. Phys [41] Crawford M H 2017 Chapter One – Materials Challenges of AlGaN-Based UV Optoelectronic Devices Semiconductors and Semimetals vol 96 pp 3–44 [42] Shatalov M, Jain R, Saxena T, Dobrinsky A and Shur M 2017 Development of Deep UV LEDs and Current Problems in Material and Device Technology
Semicond. Semimetals Phys. status solidi
Adv. Opt. Photonics
43 [45] Takano T, Mino T, Sakai J, Noguchi N, Tsubaki K and Hirayama H 2017 Deep-ultraviolet light-emitting diodes with external quantum efficiency higher than 20% at 275 nm achieved by improving light-extraction efficiency
Appl. Phys. Express Appl. Phys. Lett.
J. Appl. Phys.
Appl. Phys. Express Appl. Phys. Express ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
Light-Emitting Diodes
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Sci. Rep. Appl. Phys. Express Appl. Phys. Lett.
Appl. Phys. Lett. Appl. Phys. Lett. Phys. status solidi Physical Foundations of Solid-State Devices (E. Fred Schubert) [60] Kitai A 2011
Principles of Solar Cells, LEDs and Diodes: The role of the PN junction (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd) [61] Yamada K, Furusawa Y, Nagai S, Hirano A, Ippommatsu M, Aosaki K, Morishima N, Amano H and Akasaki I 2015 Development of underfilling and encapsulation for deep-ultraviolet LEDs
Appl. Phys. Express Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.
Appl. Phys. Express [65] Kinoshita T, Hironaka K, Obata T, Nagashima T, Dalmau R, Schlesser R, Moody B, Xie J, Inoue S, Kumagai Y, Koukitu A and Sitar Z 2012 Deep-Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes Fabricated on AlN Substrates Prepared by Hydride Vapor Phase Epitaxy Appl. Phys. Express Appl. Phys. Lett. ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018) carbide substrates
ProQuest Diss. Theses; Ph.D. [68] Vampola K 2009 Improvement of III-N visible and ultraviolet light-emitting diode performance, including extraction efficiency, electrical efficiency, thermal management and efficiency maintenance at high current densities.
ProQuest Diss. Theses; Ph.D. [69] Park J-S, Fothergill D W, Wellenius P, Bishop S M, Muth J F and Davis R F 2006 Origins of Parasitic Emissions from 353 nm AlGaN-based Ultraviolet Light Emitting Diodes over SiC Substrates
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. J. Appl. Phys.
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Nanotechnol. Microelectron. Mater. Process. Meas. Phenom. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Nature
Appl. Phys. Lett. Appl. Phys. Lett.
Appl. Phys. Express Appl. Phys. Express Appl. Phys. Lett. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Reports J. Cryst. Growth
J. Cryst. Growth
ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
LEDs (Late News) [83] SaifAddin B K, Foronda H, Michael Iza, Nakamura S, DenBaars S P and Speck J S 2016 Epi-Transfer Technology for High EQE UV LEDs Grown on SiC (Late News)
MRS Int. Work. Nitride Semicond. (IWN 2016). Orlando, Fl. [84] SaifAddin B K, Foronda H, Almogbel A, Zollner C J, Iza M, Nakamura S, Denbaars S P and Speck J S 2017 First demonstration of lateral thin-film flip-chip ultraviolet light emitting diodes grown on SiC (Late News) (Strasbourg, France) [85] SaifAddin B K, Zollner C J, Almogbel A, Foronda H, Wu F, Albadri A, Al Yamani A, Iza M, Nakamura S, Denbaars S P and Speck J S 2018 Developments in AlGaN and UV-C LEDs grown on SiC
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering vol 10554 [86] Fujii T, Gao Y, Sharma R, Hu E L, DenBaars S P and Nakamura S 2004 Increase in the extraction efficiency of GaN-based light-emitting diodes via surface roughening
Appl. Phys. Lett.
855 [87] Shchekin O B, Epler J E, Trottier T A, Margalith T, Steigerwald D A, Holcomb M O, Martin P S and Krames M R 2006 High performance thin-film flip-chip InGaN–GaN light-emitting diodes IEEE/OSA J. Disp. Technol. [89] Zhou L, Epler J E, Krames M R, Goetz W, Gherasimova M, Ren Z, Han J, Kneissl M and Johnson N M 2006 Vertical injection thin-film AlGaN∕AlGaN multiple-quantum-well deep ultraviolet light-emitting diodes
Appl. Phys. Lett. Appl. Phys. Express Appl. Phys. Express Phys. status solidi Solid. State. Electron. Semicond. Sci. Technol. Appl. Phys. Lett. Appl. Phys. Express ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
DenBaars S 2016 Photoelectrochemical liftoff of LEDs grown on freestanding c-plane GaN substrates
Opt. Express Opt. Express [99] Tsau C H, Spearing S M and Schmidt M A 2004 Characterization of Wafer-Level Thermocompression Bonds
J. Microelectromechanical Syst. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanom. Struct. Process. Meas. Phenom. Appl. Phys. Lett. Appl. Phys. Lett.
739 [104] Chabert P, Cunge G, Booth J-P and Perrin J 2001 Reactive ion etching of silicon carbide in SF6 gas: Detection of CF, CF2, and SiF2 etch products
Appl. Phys. Lett. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanom. Struct. F plasma J. Appl. Phys. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanom. Struct. x Ga P with a SiCl /SF plasma J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. L353–6 [110] Feynman R P, Leighton R B and Sands M L 1986
The Feynman lectures on physics (Narosa Pub. House) [111] Hao G-D, Taniguchi M, Tamari N and Inoue S 2016 Enhanced wall-plug efficiency in AlGaN-based deep-ultraviolet light-emitting diodes with uniform current spreading p -electrode structures J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. ProQuest Diss. Theses; Ph.D. [113] Lee K H, Park H J, Kim S H, Asadirad M, Moon Y-T, Kwak J S and Ryou J-H 2015 Light-extraction efficiency control in AlGaN-based deep-ultraviolet flip-chip light-emitting diodes: a comparison to InGaN-based visible flip-chip light-emitting diodes
Opt. Express ST-105156.R1 (accepted in Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2018)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
Appl. Phys. Lett. [116] Lachab M, Sun W, Jain R, Dobrinsky A, Gaevski M, Rumyantsev S, Shur M and Shatalov M 2017 Optical polarization control of photo-pumped stimulated emissions at 238 nm from AlGaN multiple-quantum-well laser structures on AlN substrates
Appl. Phys. Express J. Disp. Technol. Appl. Phys. Lett.
Appl. Phys. Lett.
Sci. Rep. J. Disp. Technol.301–16