Observation of a reversal of breakout reconnection preceding a jet: evidence of oscillatory magnetic reconnection?
Junchao Hong, Jiayan Yang, Huadong Chen, Yi Bi, Bo Yang, Hechao Chen
aa r X i v : . [ a s t r o - ph . S R ] M a r Draft version March 5, 2019
Typeset using L A TEX default style in AASTeX62
Observation of a reversal of breakout reconnection preceding a jet: evidence of oscillatory magnetic reconnection ? Junchao Hong,
Jiayan Yang,
1, 2
Huadong Chen, Yi Bi,
Bo Yang,
1, 2 and Hechao Chen Yunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650216, China Center for Astronomical Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100012, China Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
ABSTRACTRecent studies have revealed that solar jets involving minifilament eruptions may be initiated underthe well-known magnetic-breakout mechanism. Before or just at the onset of those jets, there shouldbe a current sheet, where breakout magnetic reconnection takes place, between open fields and theoutside of the jet-base arcade carrying minifilament in its core. In this paper we present a jet producedby eruption of two minifilaments lying at the jet base. A current sheet is directly detected near thejet base before the onset of the eruption, suggesting the magnetic-breakout mechanism. However,we further find that the current sheet undergoes a transition. The current sheet first shortens tozero in length, but then lengthens towards an orthogonal direction relative to its initial orientation.The change of the current sheet gives rise to a reversal of the breakout reconnection, as the inflowand outflow regions before the transition become the outflow and inflow regions after the transition,respectively. We therefore propose that this observation provides evidence for the so-called oscillatoryreconnection which is defined by a series of reconnection reversals but not yet proved to exist in realplasma environment of the solar atmosphere.
Keywords:
Sun: chromosphere — Sun: filaments, prominences — Sun: corona — Sun: activity INTRODUCTIONSolar jets are transient, collimated plasma ejections that escape away from the low solar atmosphere along openor far-reaching magnetic fields. They have been observed to be ubiquitous across the Sun surface and studied exten-sively over the last several decades (see the recent reviews Innes et al. 2016; Raouafi et al. 2016). Theoretically, it iswidely accepted that jets are produced by magnetic reconnection at a magnetic-null region between a closed field andsurrounding open field (e.g. Shibata et al. 1992; Yokoyama & Shibata 1995; Archontis et al. 2005; Jiang et al. 2007;Chen et al. 2008; Pariat et al. 2015, 2016; Ni et al. 2017). The magnetic null is susceptible to collapse to form a currentsheet where bursty reconnection can takes place (Antiochos 1990; Priest 2000). Observationally, the magnetic configu-ration with a magnetic-null point prior to a jet has been inferred from the specific fan-spine shapes of jet emissions inthe corona, the circular flare ribbons in the chromosphere at jet base, and the so-called embedded bipolar fields in thephotosphere (Wang & Liu 2012; Zhang et al. 2012; Li et al. 2017; McCauley et al. 2017). However, the current sheetbetween the closed field and open field has rarely been observed directly at the onset of a jet.Recent observations have revealed that solar jets are accompanied by minifilament (Wang et al. 2000) eruptions inthe manner like large coronal mass ejections (CMEs) by large-scale filament eruptions (Li et al. 2015; Sterling et al.2015, 2016; Hong et al. 2016, 2017; Panesar et al. 2016, 2017, 2018; Zhang & Zhang 2017; Shen et al. 2012a, 2017;Moore et al. 2018). Sterling et al. (2015) select 20 polar jets randomly which are recorded in coronal images of X-rayand extreme ultraviolet (EUV) wavelengths simultaneously. They find that for each example an EUV minifilamenterupted upward from the pre-jet base, producing a X-ray jet above the base and leaving a flare-like brighteningnear the base. Using the joint observations from New Vacuum Solar Telescope (NVST; Liu et al. 2014) and
SolarDynamic Observatory ( SDO ; Pesnell et al. (2012)) , Hong et al. (2016) report in detail how a standard jet seen in
Corresponding author: Junchao [email protected]
Hong et al.
EUV wavelength is initiated by a minifilament eruption detected at H α emission line. The erupting minifilamentforced the external closed field enveloping itself to reconnect with the long coronal loops nearby. As a result, anjet along the loops was produced by that external reconnection. The external reconnection for the jet productioncorresponds to the well-known breakout reconnection for CMEs involving large filament eruptions (Antiochos 1998;Antiochos et al. 1999; Shen et al. 2012b; Chen et al. 2016). Very recently, Moore et al. (2018) find that 6 of 15 polarX-ray jets they studied are plausibly initiated due to the breakout reconnection in each minifilament eruption . If thedata has enough resolution and the viewpoint is proper, a current sheet, the site for breakout reconnection, should beseen between the jet-base explosive close field and the open field for those jets.Via three-dimensional (3D) magnetohydynamic simulations, Wyper et al. (2018) present a breakout model for theminifilament-jet events, as a small-scale extension of the well-known breakout mechanism for large CMEs. The basicmagnetic setup consists of the background open fields and an embedded bipolar field, separated by a null point.They give a persistent shearing motion at the bipolar footpoints in their simulations. Over time, a sheared filamentchannel forms and expands in the core of the bipolar filed, and the magnetic pressure within the bipolar field increasesconstantly. Sequently, the breakout current sheet is built because the null point above the bipolar field becomesincreasingly compressed. As the breakout reconnection open the strapping fields above the minifilament to someextent, the minifilament erupts upward inevitably towards the breakout current sheet. The field (possibly a flux rope)holding and threading the rising minifilament continues to reconnect with the open fields, producing an apparent jetspire. Meanwhile, the flare reconnection under the erupting minifilament occurs impulsively, accelerating the escape ofthe ejecta and making miniature flare-like brightening at the jet base. Wyper et al. (2018) suggest that the breakoutmechanism for jet generation is robust in despite of varying inclinations of the background open fields. In addition,the breakout behavior is not sensitive to whether the minifilament in the core of the bipolar field is held by a shearedarcade or true flux rope.In this paper we present a jet produced by successive eruptions of two minifilaments lying at the pre-jet base. Thejet displays typical fan-spine topology where the breakout reconnection occurs plausibly at the null point, evidenced bya current sheet directly detected before the onset of the jet. However, the current sheet takes an interesting behavior:It shortens its length to zero along its orientation, and then lengthens towards an orthogonal direction relative to itsinitial orientation. The entire process is plausibly in self generation. The change of the current sheet indicates thatthe inflow and outflow regions of the breakout reconnection interchange each other. This gives one a reminiscent ofthe “oscillatory reconnection” featured by a series of reconnection reversals in a self-consistent manner, which is firstreported in numerical simulations (Murray et al. 2009) but not yet found in observations. OBSERVATIONS AND DATAThe jet is recorded by
SDO and the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (
IRIS ; De Pontieu et al. 2014) simulta-neously. The jet started at about 15:26 UT, peaked at around 15:34 UT, and became faint after 15:50 UT on 2014November 16 near the Active Region AR12209 (S15E32) on solar disk.
SDO provides full-disk imaging data by the onboard telescopes Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA; Lemen et al.2012) and Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI; Schou et al. 2012). AIA images the Sun at UV-EUV wavelengthswith cadences of 24-12 s and pixel sizes of 0. ′′
6. HMI gives the photospheric magnetograms with 45 s cadence and 0. ′′ k), and thus are used to reveal the fan-spine shape of the jet. The current sheet associated with the jet canbe observed at all of the EUV wavelengths of AIA including the He II emission line at 304 ˚A , and six Fe emission lines at171,193,211,335,131,94 ˚A . Therefore, plasmas within the current sheet can be diagnosed with the almost simultaneousobservations of the six AIA Fe lines via differential emission measure (DEM) analysis (e.g. Aschwanden & Boerner2011; Cheng et al. 2012; Su et al. 2018). The AIA UV channel 1600 ˚A are dominated by chromospheric continuumand transition-region line emission, and thus are used to show the circular flare ribbon and remote brightening in thefan-spine jet, and time profile of the flare emission. HMI line-of-sight magnetograms are used to inspect the magneticfield configuration and evolution in the jet source region. IRIS imaged the jet source region from 14:54 UT to 15:34 UT by its slit-jaw camera at 1330, 2796, and 1400 ˚A . Theobservational period covers the pre-jet evolution and the growing phase of the jet. The 1400 ˚A slit-jaw images (SJIs)are used here with a cadence of 37 s and a high spatial resolution of 0. ′′
33. The SJI 1400 ˚A images reflect plasma ofbright chromospheric continuum and Si IV transition-region line emission, and thus are easily aligned to the AIA 1600˚A images. Due to the extreme high resolution of
IRIS , the current sheet is very discernibly detected to undergo the scillatory reconnection
IRIS /SJIobservation. RESULTSFigure 1 presents the overview of the jet with the
SDO data. A time sequence of the interesting region for the jetis displayed in panels a1-a4 with AIA 131 ˚A images at four different moments . At 15:18 UT and 15:22 UT, the jetspire was not seen and the jet-base region (outlined by the orange boxes) did not become bright. At 15:29 UT, thejet base became a compact, bright dome and a long, bright jet spire stemmed from the top of the bright dome. Thejet spire was arose along preexisting, far-reaching coronal loops and a bright brightening appeared at the far endsof those loops. The AIA 1600 ˚A image in panel d further detected a circular bright ribbon in the jet base besidesthe remote brightening. Combining with the magnetogram (panel e), it is know that the circular ribbon is locatedat some scattered positive polarities that surround a negative polarity (N) at center. There are two main positivepatches, labeled as P1 on the north of N and P2 on the south of N. These features point to an existence of magneticconfiguration of the fan-spine topology (Masson et al. 2009, 2014). At 15:38 UT, the jet spire developed multi separatestrands and broaden to about the width of the jet base, displaying the typical morphology of blowout jet (Moore et al.2010).Two linear-shaped bright structures were seen near the jet base before the onset of the jet. They are the line segmentC1 at 15:18 UT and C2 at 15:22 UT, as shown by the close-up views of the jet base in panels g and h respectively.Each end of C1/C2 presents a bifurcate structure, connecting a very bent curve of bright structure. This patterngives a reminiscent of the classical 2D picture of magnetic reconnection, indicating that C1/C2 is the projection of acurrent sheet (Parker 1957; Sweet 1958; Petschek 1964). The current sheet separates two sets of anti-parallel fieldlinesat its two sides as the inflow regions before reconnection, and connects the reconnected fieldlines at its two ends as theoutflow region after reconnection. Recently, small current sheets between two sets of anti-parallel loops are reported inseveral papers (Yang et al. 2015; Yang & Xiang 2016; Xue et al. 2016, 2018; Yang et al. 2018). For the present jet, theexistence of C1/C2 indicates the happening of the so-called interchange reconnection between closed field and “open”field (Crooker et al. 2002).According to the linkage of C1/C2 with the surrounding bent bright structures and the overlaid magnetic fields inpanels g/h, we can infer the connectivity of the inflow and outflow fieldlines for the interchange reconnection at C1/C2.For C1, magnetic reconnection should take place between the closed fieldline connecting P1 to N and the open linealong the jet spire rooted at P2. As a result, one outflow fieldline is open with footpoint at P1, as traced out by thebent bright structure contacting the left end of C1; and the other outflow fieldline is a close loop connecting P2 toN. Again, for C2, magnetic reconnection should occur between the closed fieldline connecting P2 to N and the openline along the jet spire rooted at P1. Consequently, one outflow fieldline is open with footpoint at P2 and the otherone is the closed loop connecting P1 to N. Comparing C1 with C2, it is concluded that (1) the orientation of C1 isorthogonal to that of C2, as C1 is roughly horizontal but C2 is roughly vertical; (2) the inflow region and the outflowregion of C1 is, respectively, the outflow region and the inflow region of C2. By overplotting C1/C2 in panel a3, it isseen that C1/C2 are located at the joint-point of the jet spire and the fan-shaped dome. Thus C1/C2 seem to be builtin the vicinity of the null point in the fan-spine magnetic configuration. The bright structures that connect the endsof C1/C2 to N and open possibly trace out the inner and outer spines, while those linking the ends of C1/C2 with P1and P2 indicate the projection of separatrix of the fan dome.Figure 2 presents the results of DEM analysis on C1 at 15:18 UT and C2 at 15:22 UT. The current sheets aresimultaneously imaged by multi wavelengths of AIA, as shown in the three-passband composite images for 171,211,and 131 ˚A (C1 in panel a1 and C2 in panel a2). Via DEM method, the temperature maps for C1/C2 are constructedas displayed in panels b1/b2, and the emission measure maps in panels c3/c4. Apparently, it is seen that the currentsheets are hotter and denser than ambient regions.The DEM distributions of plasmas inside C1/C2 are further derived as shown in Figure 2(e/f). The results arecomputed by using the mean digital numbers (DNs) over an area (outlined by the boxes in panels a1/a2) subtractedby a background value determined from the nearby quiet regions. With 100 Monte Carlo simulations of the DEMinversion calculation, it is seen that the DEM curves are well constrained in a broad temperature range although poorlyconstrained in a few temperature bins. C1 and C2 have almost similar DEM distribution and are multi-thermal assigned by the broad distribution from logT = 5 . logT = 7 .
5. Both them have the peak temperature at logT = 6 . ∼ Hong et al. according to the expresses EM = R DEM( T ) dT and T = R DEM( T ) T dT /
EM. C1 has an averaged temperature of ∼ cm − , is denser (or has a greaterextent along the line of sight) than C1 with an EM of 1.4x10 cm − .The jet source region is simultaneously watched by IRIS . With the unprecedented high resolution of
IRIS /SJI 1400˚A images, it allows one to discuss the evolution of C1/C2 on detail. Figure 3 shows a successive process from C1 toC2. At 14:55 UT, no current sheet was seen at the pre-jet base, but two minifilaments, F1 and F2, were found lyingat the base. With the overlaid magnetic field, it is shown that F1 resided along the neutral line between P1 and Nwhile F2 along the neutral line between N and P2. This also indicates the existence of an X-type null point above thetwo minifilament, similar to the situation that an X-type null point above the twin magnetic arcades under a coronalpseudo streamer (Wang et al. 2007; Bi et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2015). The yellow arrow points to the approximatelocation of the expected X-type null point where the current sheet C1 appeared later.C1 was faintly seen around 14:58 UT at the first time in 1400 ˚A images. It was still faint at 15:09:26 UT but laterbecame discernible gradually. When C1 got most long at 15:17:32 UT, jet-like flow emitting from the left end of C1was also discernible. At this time, C1 was estimated to have an apparent length of ∼ ′′ .3 and a width of ∼ ′′ .6. Fourdomains, registered with “A”, “B”, “D”, and “E” in the 15:17:32 UT image, were separated by C1. According to theclassic model of magnetic reconnection, it is known that the domains A and B at each side of C1 represent the inflowregions for the reconnection while D and E indicate the outflow regions at the two ends of the current sheet. From the15:17:32 UT image with overlaid magnetic contours, it is inferred that the inflow region A is occupied by open fieldrooted near P2 while the inflow region B contains closed field linking P1 to N. Therefore, interchange reconnectiontook place between the open field in A and the closed field in B (Crooker et al. 2002). Consequently, new open fieldalong which the jetlike flow propagated outward, was formed to be rooted at P1 in the outflow region D. New closedfield linking N to P2 was piled in the outflow region E.Note that the reconnection at C1 actually removed the magnetic arcade (P1-N) that covers the underneath minifila-ment F1. In this respect, the interchange reconnection corresponds to the so-called breakout reconnection as a triggerfor many large filament eruptions (Antiochos 1998; Antiochos et al. 1999). However, the breakout reconnection didnot trigger F1 to erupt immediately. Instead, the breakout current sheet, C1, started to shorten itself at one momentafter 15:17:32, as its outflow regions D-E was approaching each other. It is seen that C1 at 15:20:01 UT was shorterthan it at 15:17:32 UT. To 15:21:16 UT, the outflow regions D-E met each other, and an X-type structure instead ofC1 was built separating the four regions A, B, D, and E. In the next one minutes, the outflow regions D and E havefurther compressed each other, and the inflow regions A and B have been pull away from each other. As a result, anew current sheet, C2, vertical with C1, appeared to separate D and E as its inflow region and A and B as its outflowregion (see the 15:22:31 UT image). C2 has been further compressed to be thinner (as seen at 15:25:38 UT), ultimatelyreaching an length of ∼ ′′ .5 and a width ∼ ′′ .7. Similar to that C1 did as the breakout current sheet above F1, C2played a role of the breakout current sheet above F2. The transition from C1 to C2 demonstrated a reversal of thebreakout reconnection. This further indicates that the breakout reconnection took place in the manner of oscillatorymagnetic reconnection (Murray et al. 2009; Archontis et al. 2010; McLaughlin et al. 2012; Thurgood et al. 2017). Adetailed discussion is present in the last section.A time-slice plot, as shown in the last frame of Fig. 3, was constructed by the slit along the long arrow in the15:22:31 UT image of Fig. 2. It is to display the duration of C1 and C2, since the slit passes across C1 and along C2.C1 lasted about 23 minutes from 14:58 UT to 15:21 UT, while C2 lasted around 7 minutes from 15:22 UT to 15:29UT. The transition from C1 to C2 took place in one minute between 15:21 UT and 15:22 UT.Although F1 did not erupt immediately because of the breakout reconnection at C1, F2 started to brighten and riseas soon as the appearance of the breakout current sheet of C2. Fig. 4 presets the eruptive phase of the jet. At 15:27:30UT, F2 was already rising up as a bright arch-like feature seen in the 1400 ˚A snapshot of Fig.4 (a1), but F1 was stillstable as a dark feature. The exact time of the start of the rise could not be determined due to F2’s very small size andprojection mask. However, F2 seems to be activated to be bright immediately after the appearance of C2, suggestedby the 15:22 UT 131 ˚A image of Fig.4(b1). From panel a1 to a2 , it is seen that F2 expanded itself and approachedto C2, keeping its arch shape. Meanwhile, brightening appeared between the magnetic polarities N and P2, similarto the initial flare brightening underlying a large-scale erupting filament. Circular brightening also appeared alongthe ambient positive polarities close to P2 , indicating the enhance of the null-point/breakout reconnection at C2. Anarrow, hot jet spire was thus been aroused at the same time, as shown by the 131 ˚A image in pane b2. scillatory reconnection SDO while
IRIS ended its observation on this region. Thejet/minifilament eruptions continued to propagate plasmas along its path as shown by the 131 ˚A images of Fig 4(b3-b4). It decayed gradually after 15:40 UT and was almost invisible after 16:00 UT. However, following the later phaseof its evolution, we found that a bright linear feature, pointed by the yellow arrows, seems to connect the jet spireto the top of the miniature flaring arcade at the base. This linear feature is likely a flare current sheet in the wakeof the eruption of F1, analog to the large current sheet in the wake of CMEs (e.g. Lin et al. 2015; Li et al. 2016;Mei et al. 2017; Yan et al. 2018). Therefore, we observed both type of current sheets in a single jet event, includingthe breakout current sheet before the onset of the jet and the the flare current sheet in the wake of jet. This resultfurther suggests the self-similarity among the narrow, small jets and the wide, large CMEs that is triggered under thebreakout mechanism (Wyper et al. 2018).Another evident characteristic of the jet is the photospheric magnetic cancellation, which is observed in the sourceregion from before to after the jet by HMI. This took place at the neutral line between negative flux N and thesurrounding positive flux (mainly P1 and P2), in which F1 and F2 also erupted. Fig. 5a shows the time sequenceof HMI magnetograms for the jet source region. It is seen that the areas of magnetic polarities P1, N, and P2 havedecreased dramatically from 14:53 UT to 15:49 UT due to the cancellation among them. During the cancellation, thereversal of the breakout reconnection was built above the source region, as sketched by the superimposed axis of F1/F2, the current sheets C1/C2 and their connectivity to P1, P2, and N. Fig.5b shows the time profile of magnetic fluxof N and the 1600 ˚A light curve of the source region. It is seen that the magnetic flux continuously decreased throughthe time of the breakout phase when C1/C2 were present and the jet phase when F1/F2 were erupting. Two peaks inthe 1600 ˚A light curve are found during the jet phase, which are possibly resulted from the successive eruption of bothminifilaments (e.g Wang et al. 2018). The relationship among the reversal of the observed breakout reconnection, theminifilament eruptions, and the magnetic cancellation will be further discussed in next section. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARYSolar jets are often found to be made by the explosively eruption of pre-jet base arcade. In general, this eruption isresulted from an eruptive structure seen as a minifilament (e.g. Hong et al. 2016) or a micro-sigmoid (Raouafi et al.2010) or even a small flux rope (Zhu et al. 2017; Joshi et al. 2018). The production of solar jets is thought to beproduced by the interaction of these eruptive structures with open fields or far-reaching loops (Sterling et al. 2015;Hong et al. 2016; Moore et al. 2018; Wyper et al. 2018). Here, we report a jet that originates from successive eruptionsof two minifilaments in the pre-jet base. One minifilament, F1, lies along the neutral line between positive magneticflux P1 and negative flux N, while the other one, F2, along the neutral line between N and P2. Magnetic field atthe pre-jet base should mainly consist of twin magnetic arcades (respectively cover F1 and F2) tied with a X-typenull point above (Wang et al. 2007). The breakout reconnection/current sheet is definitely found before the eruption,which is plausibly built at the X-type null point. The jet is triggered when F2 first erupts toward the breakout currentsheet and participates in the breakout reconnection. F1 erupts immediately following the breaking of F2. Similarto large filament eruption, a small flare current sheet appears in the wake of the eruption of F1, which connects thejet spire with the miniature flare arcade in the jet base. Both F1 and F2 are broken and ejected into the jet body.Therefore, the present jet suggests the breakout model for solar jets proposed by Wyper et al. (2018). This result isalso consistent with the observational inspection about the trigger for polar X-ray jets by Moore et al. (2018).Magnetic cancellation is also observed at the jet base, which mainly occurred at the neutral lines under F1 and F2. Itis well known that magnetic cancellation plays an important role in triggering different scale of filament/jet eruptions(e.g Hong et al. 2011, 2014; Panesar et al. 2016; Moore & Roumeliotis 1992; Huang et al. 2012). The observed jet
Hong et al. should be resulted from the joint action of both of the breakout reconnection above the base arcade and the magneticcancellation under the minifilaments. Just before the onset of the jet, F1 does not erupt immediately following thebreakout reconnection at C1 while F2 gets bright and rises up as soon as the appearance of C2. We conjecture thatthis is possibly because the magnetic cancellation under F1 did not disturb F1 as enough as that disturbs F2. Thispoint needs to be verified in future work.Properties of this jet, including the breakout reconnection, the minifilament eruptions, and the magnetic cancellation,are similar to those commonly observed in large scale CMEs. Thus, in line with other literatures (e.g. Schrijver 2010;Raouafi et al. 2010; Wyper et al. 2017), the observations suggest again that multi-scale (from jets to CMEs) of solareruptive activities are self-similar in terms of observational properties and triggering mechanisms.However, the breakout reconnection undergoes a reversal, indicated by the transition of the breakout current sheetfrom C1 to C2. C1 is orthogonal to C2. The current sheet displays as C1 about 23 minutes. Then it shortens in lengthto zero and grows out again as C2. The transition from C1 to C2 takes about 1 minute. After that, C2 lasts about7 minutes until the start of the jet. As a result, the inflow and outflow regions around C1 become the outflow andinflow regions around C2, respectively. The breakout reconnection thus occurs a reversal, leading to the effect thatweakens the magnetic constraint on F1 become that weakens the magnetic constraint on F2. This helps F2 to lift offaway from balance.The reversal of magnetic reconnection is first found in solar atmosphere. The occurrence of reconnection reversal ispossibly a self-consistent behavior (Murray et al. 2009). Using a 2.5-dimensional numerical simulation, Murray et al.(2009) first report “oscillatory reconnection” that is characterized by a series of reconnection reversals initiated in aself-consistent manner. The reconnection is first built between an emerged bipolar arcade and ambient open fieldsin their simulation. Then the reconnection lasts in distinct bursts. The inflow and outflow regions of one burst ofreconnection become the outflow and inflow regions in the following burst of reconnection. The magnetic system finallysettles toward equilibrium through consecutive bursts of reconnection. They argues that oscillatory reconnection occurif the outflow regions are quasi-bounded during each burst of reconnection. The reconnection reversal occurs becausethe gas pressure in the bounded outflow regions increases above the level of that in the inflow regions. For the presentjet, the outflow regions around the current sheet C1 are actually quasi-bounded, thus the reversal occurs and thecurrent sheet changes from C1 to C2. In turn, the observed reversal of reconnection provides the direct evidence ofoscillatory reconnection proposed by Murray et al. (2009). However, different from the simulation, we do not observetwo or more reversals of reconnection that keep the magnetic system stable. Instead, the magnetic fields in the jetbase become unstable and erupt out only after one reversal. This is because of the release of free energy stored in themagnetic fields of the minifilaments in the jet base. Zhang et al. (2014) reports repeating magnetic reconnection in acoronal bright point, which is likely a case of the oscillatory reconnection. More observations are needed to understanddeeply the nature of the reversal of magnetic reconnection and confirm if the reconnection reversal is popular in solaratmosphere.In summary, the present observations directly image the evolution of the breakout current sheet that precedes theeruption of a minifilament-jet event. The breakout current sheet has an apparent length less than 3 ′′ and width lessthan 1 ′′ . Particularly, according to the transition of the current sheet from the horizontal C1 to the vertical C2, weconclude that the breakout reconnection undergoes a reversal in the vicinity of a potential coronal null point. Theentire evolution of the current sheet can be detected in images of multi-wavelength emissions including AIA EUVand IRIS transition-region lines. Via DEM analysis, C1/C2 are found to be multi-thermal in nature, with the meantemperatures of about 7/6.8 Mk, the peak temperature at 1.6 Mk, and the EMs of 1.4/2.5 x 10 cm − . Similarprocess referring to such reconnection reversal are only be found in numerical simulations for oscillatory reconnectionas before (Murray et al. 2009; Archontis et al. 2010; McLaughlin et al. 2012; Thurgood et al. 2017).The data used here are courtesy of the IRIS and
SDO science teams. This work is supported by the Natural ScienceFoundation of China under grants 11503081, 11633008, 11703084, 11333007, 11573012, and 11503082, and by the CASprograms “Light of West China” and “QYZDJ-SSW-SLH012”, and by the grant associated with the Project of theGroup for Innovation of Yunnan Province. REFERENCES
Antiochos, S. K. 1990, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 61, 369 Antiochos, S. K. 1998, ApJL, 502, L181 scillatory reconnection Antiochos, S. K., DeVore, C. R., & Klimchuk, J. A. 1999,ApJ, 510, 485Archontis, V., Moreno-Insertis, F., Galsgaard, K., & Hood,A. W. 2005, ApJ, 635, 1299Archontis, V., Tsinganos, K., & Gontikakis, C. 2010, A&A,512, L2Archontis, V., & Hood, A. W. 2013, ApJL, 769, L21Aschwanden, M. J., & Boerner, P. 2011, ApJ, 732, 81Bi, Y., Jiang, Y., Yang, J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 773, 162Chen, H. D., Jiang, Y. C., & Ma, S. L. 2008, A&A, 478, 907Chen, Y., Du, G., Zhao, D., et al. 2016, ApJL, 820, L37Cheng, X., Zhang, J., Saar, S. H., & Ding, M. D. 2012,ApJ, 761, 62Crooker, N. U., Gosling, J. T., & Kahler, S. W. 2002,Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 107,1028De Pontieu, B., Title, A. M., Lemen, J. R., et al. 2014,SoPh, 289, 2733Hong, J., Jiang, Y., Zheng, R., et al. 2011, ApJL, 738, L20Hong, J.-C., Jiang, Y.-C., Yang, J.-Y., et al. 2013, Researchin Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13, 253Hong, J., Jiang, Y., Yang, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 73Hong, J., Jiang, Y., Yang, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 60Hong, J., Jiang, Y., Yang, J., Li, H., & Xu, Z. 2017, ApJ,835, 35Huang, Z., Madjarska, M. S., Doyle, J. G., & Lamb, D. A.2012, A&A, 548, A62Innes, D., Bucik, R., Guo, L.-J., & Nitta, N. 2016,arXiv:1603.03258Jiang, Y. C., Chen, H. D., Li, K. J., Shen, Y. D., & Yang,L. H. 2007, A&A, 469, 331Joshi, N. C., Nishizuka, N., Filippov, B., Magara, T., &Tlatov, A. G. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 1286Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J., et al. 2012, SoPh,275, 17Li, H., Jiang, Y., Yang, J., et al. 2017, ApJL, 842, L20Li, L. P., Zhang, J., Su, J. T., & Liu, Y. 2016, ApJL, 829,L33Li, X., Yang, S., Chen, H., Li, T., & Zhang, J. 2015, ApJL,814, L13Li, T., Yang, S., Zhang, Q., Hou, Y., & Zhang, J. 2018,ApJ, 859, 122Lin, J., Murphy, N. A., Shen, C., et al. 2015, SSRv, 194, 237Liu, Z., Xu, J., Gu, B.-Z., et al. 2014, Research inAstronomy and Astrophysics, 14, 705-718Masson, S., Pariat, E., Aulanier, G., & Schrijver, C. J.2009, ApJ, 700, 559Masson, S., McCauley, P., Golub, L., Reeves, K. K., &DeLuca, E. E. 2014, ApJ, 787, 145 McLaughlin, J. A., Thurgood, J. O., & MacTaggart, D.2012, A&A, 548, A98McCauley, P. I., Cairns, I. H., Morgan, J., et al. 2017, ApJ,851, 151Mei, Z. X., Keppens, R., Roussev, I. I., & Lin, J. 2017,A&A, 604, L7Moore, R. L., & Roumeliotis, G. 1992, IAU Colloq. 133:Eruptive Solar Flares, 399, 69Moore, R. L., Cirtain, J. W., Sterling, A. C., & Falconer,D. A. 2010, ApJ, 720, 757Moore, R. L., Sterling, A. C., & Panesar, N. K. 2018, ApJ,859, 3Murray, M. J., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., & Baker, D. 2009,A&A, 494, 329Ni, L., Zhang, Q.-M., Murphy, N. A., & Lin, J. 2017, ApJ,841, 27Parker, E. N. 1957, J. Geophys. Res., 62, 509Pariat, E., Dalmasse, K., DeVore, C. R., Antiochos, S. K.,& Karpen, J. T. 2015, A&A, 573, A130Pariat, E., Dalmasse, K., DeVore, C. R., Antiochos, S. K.,& Karpen, J. T. 2016, A&A, 596, A36Panesar, N. K., Sterling, A. C., Moore, R. L., &Chakrapani, P. 2016, ApJL, 832, L7Panesar, N. K., Sterling, A. C., & Moore, R. L. 2017, ApJ,844, 131Panesar, N. K., Sterling, A. C., & Moore, R. L. 2018, ApJ,853, 189Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J., & Chamberlin, P. C.2012, SoPh, 275, 3Petschek, H. E. 1964, NASA Special Publication, 50, 425Priest, E. R., & Forbes, T. G. 2000, MagneticReconnection: MHD Theory and Applications(Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)Raouafi, N.-E., Georgoulis, M. K., Rust, D. M., &Bernasconi, P. N. 2010, ApJ, 718, 981Raouafi, N. E., Patsourakos, S., Pariat, E., et al. 2016,SSRvSchou, J., Scherrer, P. H., Bush, R. I., et al. 2012, SoPh,275, 229Schrijver, C. J. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1480Su, Y., Veronig, A. M., Hannah, I. G., et al. 2018, ApJL,856, L17Shibata, K., Ishido, Y., Acton, L. W., et al. 1992, PASJ, 44,L173Shen, Y., Liu, Y., Su, J., & Deng, Y. 2012, ApJ, 745, 164Shen, Y., Liu, Y., & Su, J. 2012, ApJ, 750, 12Shen, Y., Liu, Y. D., Su, J., Qu, Z., & Tian, Z. 2017, ApJ,851, 67Sterling, A. C., Moore, R. L., Falconer, D. A., & Knox,J. M. 2014, ApJL, 788, L20
Hong et al.
Sterling, A. C., Moore, R. L., Falconer, D. A., & Adams,M. 2015, Nature, 523, 437Sterling, A. C., Moore, R. L., Falconer, D. A., et al. 2016,ApJ, 821, 100Sweet, P. A. 1958, Electromagnetic Phenomena in CosmicalPhysics, 6, 123Thurgood, J. O., Pontin, D. I., & McLaughlin, J. A. 2017,ApJ, 844, 2T¨or¨ok, T., Panasenco, O., Titov, V. S., et al. 2011, ApJL,739, L63Wang, J., Li, W., Denker, C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 530, 1071Wang, H., & Liu, C. 2012, ApJ, 760, 101Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N. R., Jr., & Rich, N. B. 2007, ApJ,658, 1340Wang, Y., Su, Y., Shen, J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 148Wyper, P. F., Antiochos, S. K., & DeVore, C. R. 2017,Nature, 544, 452Wyper, P. F., DeVore, C. R., & Antiochos, S. K. 2018,ApJ, 852, 98 Xue, Z., Yan, X., Cheng, X., et al. 2016, NatureCommunications, 7, 11837Xue, Z., Yan, X., Yang, L., et al. 2018, ApJL, 858, L4Yan, X. L., Yang, L. H., Xue, Z. K., et al. 2018, ApJL, 853,L18Yang, B., Yang, J., Bi, Y., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 135Yang, S., Zhang, J., & Xiang, Y. 2015, ApJL, 798, L11Yang, S., & Xiang, Y. 2016, ApJL, 819, L24Yang, J., Jiang, Y., Xu, Z., Bi, Y., & Hong, J. 2015, ApJ,803, 68Yokoyama, T., & Shibata, K. 1995, Nature, 375, 42Zhang, Q. M., Chen, P. F., Guo, Y., Fang, C., & Ding,M. D. 2012, ApJ, 746, 19Zhang, Q. M., Chen, P. F., Ding, M. D., & Ji, H. S. 2014,A&A, 568, A30Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. 2017, ApJ, 834, 79Zhu, X., Wang, H., Cheng, X., & Huang, C. 2017, ApJL,844, L20 scillatory reconnection Figure 1.
The present jet is fully detected by
SDO . Panels a1-a4: AIA 131 ˚A images showing the initiation and growth of thejet. Panels g and h: the close-up views within the orange boxes in panels a1 and a2, respectively. To enhance the visibility ofthe possible current sheets C1/C2, the present 131 ˚A images are the average of five consecutive snapshots in one minute of the12s-cadence AIA 131 ˚A snapshots. Panel d: AIA 1600 ˚A image showing the circular ribbon and remote brightening during thejet. Panel e: HMI line-of-sight magnetogram showing the photospheric magnetic fields associated with the jet. The magneticfield in the source region of the jet consists of a negative patch (N) roughly surrounded by some scattered positive patches(mainly P1 and P2). Green/blue contours in panels g and h are the levels of the HMI magnetic field at (-200, -80)/(200, 80) G,while in panel d at -100/100 G. Hong et al.
Figure 2.
The sheet structure of C1/C2 shown in three-passband composite image for AIA 171, 211, and 131 ˚A (panelsa1/a2 ), and in temperature (panels b1/b2) and emission measure (panels c1/c2) maps constructed via DEM analysis. Panelse and f give the averaged DEM distributions of two regions outlined by the small boxes with sizes of 1 ′′ .2 at the sheets C1/C2,respectively. The red curves represent the best-fit DEM curves while the piled black curves around the red curve in each panelare 100 Monte Carlo simulations as an estimation of the DEM inversion errors. scillatory reconnection Figure 3.
The detailed evolution of the current sheets C1/C2 before the jet in the
IRIS /SJI 1400 ˚A images. In the first panel,F1 represents the pre-jet minifilament lying along the magnetic polarity inversion zone between P1 and N, while F2 representsthe other one between P2 and N. The letters A, B, D, and E indicate four domains around the recconntion site, i.e. C1/C2. Inthe right bottom panel is a 1400 ˚A time-slice plot which is made from slits along the long arrow. The yellow dotted lines on thetime-slice image indicate the duration of C1 and C2. The blue (green) contours indicate magnetic field strength at levels of 80,200 (-80, -200) G. Hong et al.
Figure 4.
Panels a1-a5: The onset and progression of the minifilament-jet eruption in
IRIS /SJI 1400 ˚A images. Panels b1-a4:The jet in the 131 ˚A images with the same FOV as that of the 1400 ˚A images. The green/blue contours indicate field strengthat levels of 80, 200 (-80, -200) G. The yellow arrows point to a possible flare current sheet in the wake of the jet. scillatory reconnection Figure 5. a : HMI magnetograms showing the photospheric magnetic field evolution in the jet base through before the formationof the breakout current sheet to the end of the jet. The axises of F1/F2 (black curves), the current sheets C1/C2 (yellow lines)and their connectivity (cyan curves) to the magnetic polarities P1, P2 and N, are drew out along the corresponding
IRIS /SJI1400 ˚A images, and are superimposed here on the magnetograms at 15:17 and 15:23 UT. bb