Sharp selective scattering of red, green and blue light achieved via gain material's loss compensation
SSharp selective scattering of red, green and blue light achieved via gain material’s loss compensation
Yiyang Ye,
Rongyue Liu,
1, a
Zhigang Song, and T. P. Chen, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore a: The two authors contributed equally to this manuscript *E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract
For a transparent projection screen based on metallic nanoparticle’s localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), in the ideal case the metallic nanoparticles dispersed in a transparent matrix only selectively scatter red, green and blue light and transmit the visible light of other colours. However, metal’s optical loss and size effect at nanoscale degenerate the desired performance by broadening the resonance peak width and increasing the absorption ratio. In this work, it is shown that the problem can be solved by introducing gain material. Numerical simulations are performed on nanostructures based on silver (Ag), gold (Au) or aluminium (Al) with or without gain material, to examine the effect of gain material and to search for suitable structures for sharp selective scattering of red, green and blue light. And it is found that introducing gain material greatly improves performance of the structures based on Ag or Au except the structures based on Al. The most suitable structures for sharp selective scattering of red, green and blue light are respectively found to be the core-shell structures of silica@Au, silica@Ag and Ag@silica, all with gain material.
Keywords : selective scattering, surface plasmon, gain material
Introduction
Recently, the idea of wavelength-selective scattering of light to achieve transparent projection screen has been proposed based on metallic nanoparticle’s localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), where in the ideal case metallic nanoparticles dispersed in a transparent matrix only selectively scatter red, green and blue light and transmit visible light of other colours. Nevertheless, due to metal’s optical loss, light absorption is inevitable in the
LSPR process of the metallic nanoparticles, which is undesirable for scattering-based applications. In addition, at nanoscale, surface scattering of conduction electrons becomes significant, which degenerates the quality of selective scattering based on LSPR by further increasing absorption ratio as well as broadening the resonance peak width. Yet, these problems may be solved by incorporating gain materials such as rare earth ions and laser dyes, which compensate optical loss, narrow LSPR peak width and are even theoretically demonstrated to enable lasing state.
In this work, through numerical simulation, we aim to achieve sharp scattering peaks t red, green and blue light, with absorption being maintained low over the visible light range (400 nm ~ 800 nm) based on metallic nanoparticle’s LSPR effect and gain material’s loss compensation. Optimizations based on metallic nanosphere and core-shell structures of metal@silica and silica@metal are conducted for gold (Au), silver (Ag) and aluminium (Al), with and without gain material, with the size effect of metallic nanoparticle on metal’s dielectric function taken into account. The results from the optimizations show that for the Ag- and Au-based structures, introducing gain material significantly improves the scattering behaviour (i.e., there are sharper scattering peaks at red, green and blue light, respectively, and low absorption over visible light range), however the improvement is not significant for the Al-based structures. And it is found that the most suitable structures for sharp selective scattering at the red, green and blue light wavelength regions are silica@Au, Ag@silica and silica@Ag, respectively, all with a gain material.
Simulation method
In this section, reasons of choosing the metals and structures for subsequent optimizations are given, and the method of optimization is described.
Since in this work, selective scattering of light is based on metallic nanoparticle’s LSPR, and LSPR is a result of resonant oscillation of free electrons in response to incident electromagnetic wave, free electron behaviours of metals to be employed in subsequent simulations should be clearly separated from the broad spectrums caused by inter-band transitions of bound electrons. According to this criteria, alkali metals, Al, Au and Ag are the candidates. But alkali metals are excluded because they are very reactive. So, only Al, Au and Ag will be used in the following simulations. The surrounding medium’s refractive index 𝑛 𝑠 is assumed to be a constant of 1.5, which is about the same as the refractive indices of glass and most polymers, in which the nanoparticles to be designed are supposed to be dispersed. In quasi-static limit, namely, when the size of a metallic nanosphere is much smaller than the wavelength of incident light, the LSPR peak appears at a particular wavelength at which the real part of the metal’s dielectric function is equal to negative 2 times of surrounding medium’s dielectric function, i.e. 𝑅𝑒[𝜀 𝑚 (𝜆 𝑅 )] = −2 ∙ 𝜀 𝑠 , where 𝜆 𝑅 is the resonance peak wavelength and 𝜀 𝑚 (𝜆 𝑅 ) is metal’s dielectric function at this wavelength, and 𝜀 𝑠 (=𝑛 𝑠2 ) is surrounding medium’s dielectric function. For Ag, Au and Al, in quasi-static limit, their resonance peaks appear at 416 nm, 540 nm and 192 nm respectively, as observed from Figure 1 below. Figure 1.
Calculated extinction efficiency spectrum of a single nanosphere with diameter of 10 nm by Mie’s theory, for (a) Ag, (b) Au and (c) Al. The real part of dielectric function is plotted for (d) Ag, (e) Au and (f) Al. The surrounding medium’s refractive index is 1.5, so surrounding medium’s dielectric function is 𝜀 𝑠 = 𝑛 𝑠2 = 2.25 , and the resonance peaks appear at the wavelengths at which 𝑅𝑒[𝜀 𝑚 (𝜆)] = −2 ∙ 𝜀 𝑠 =−4.5 . The dielectric functions of the metals are from literature. Increasing metallic nanosphere’s size can red-shift its resonance peak, but further decreasing the size of a nanosphere with a size much smaller than the wavelength of incident light does not significantly blue-shift its resonance peak. Thus, here, the resonance peak wavelengths for Ag, Au and Al spheres in the quasi-static limit are perceived as the lower limits of their corresponding tuning ranges of resonance peak wavelength. The wavelengths of red, green and blue light are around 630 nm, 520 nm and 450 nm respectively. So, here, Au is considered only for red light scattering, as the lower limit (540 nm) of its resonance-peak-wavelength tuning range is larger than the wavelength of green light, while Ag and Al are considered for scattering of all three colours of light. The next step is to red-shift the metallic nanoparticles’ resonance peak wavelengths from their respective ones in the quasi-static limit, to red light for Au, and to all three colours of light for Ag and Al. A small red-shift of resonance peak of less than about 50 nm can be achieved by increasing the metallic nanospheres’ size. But relying on increasing size to red-shift resonance peak by more than 100 nm has the following problem: the dipole resonance peak’s strength will decrease, and the quadruple mode peak will appear and gradually become dominant, resulting in an overall broad extinction spectrum. A feasible solution to achieve flexible red-shift of resonance peak is to use the structure of metallic nanoshell, which easily tunes the esonance peak wavelength via the ratio of shell thickness to core diameter.
1, 10, 26
Therefore, the structures of metallic nanosphere and nanoshell are employed in subsequent optimizations when gain material is not included, with the assumption that the dielectric core of nanoshell is silica. In the case of metallic nanoshell, the gain material is introduced by doping the silica core with gain material; while in the metallic nanosphere’s case, the gain material is introduced by surrounding the metallic nanosphere by a shell of silica doped with gain material. With the above considerations, the structures to be considered during optimization are summarized in Table 1 below.
Table 1
Structures on which optimizations are to be performed to search for solutions of sharp selective scattering of red, green and blue light.
Without gain material With gain material Red Au sphere, silica@Au, silica@Ag, silica@Al Au@silica, silica@Au, silica@Ag, silica@Al Green Ag sphere, silica@Ag, silica@Al Ag@silica, silica@Ag, silica@Al Blue Ag sphere, silica@Ag, silica@Al Ag@silica, silica@Ag, silica@Al
For the purpose of optimization, a figure of merit (
𝐹𝑂𝑀 ) is defined:
𝐹𝑂𝑀 = 𝜎 𝑠𝑐𝑎 (𝜆 𝑅 )2𝜎 𝑠𝑐𝑎 ̅̅̅̅̅ + max{|𝜎 𝑎𝑏𝑠 |} (1) where 𝜎 𝑠𝑐𝑎 and 𝜎 𝑎𝑏𝑠 are the scattering and absorption cross sections, respectively which are calculated by the Mie’s theory, or the extension of the theory for core-shell structure. The overbar and the symbol 𝑚𝑎𝑥{… } denote the mean and the maximum values respectively in the visible spectrum (from 400 nm to 800 nm), and 𝜆 𝑅 is the resonance wavelength as mentioned earlier. This 𝐹𝑂𝑀 is defined in the way reported in reference, except the introduction of an absolute value operator on 𝜎 𝑎𝑏𝑠 . This
𝐹𝑂𝑀 favours the following properties: high scattering cross section at resonant wavelength and low scattering cross section elsewhere to form a sharp scattering peak and an overall small value of absorption cross section. Introducing gain material can make the absorption cross section negative, and eventually result in a lasing state if the absolute value operator is not put on 𝜎 𝑎𝑏𝑠 in equation (1) during optimization of 𝐹𝑂𝑀 . The purpose of introducing gain material is to just compensate light absorption caused by metallic nanoparticle’s optical loss, and a low magnitude of overall absorption cross section is preferred over its mathematical value. Since at nanoscale, the size of a metallic nanoparticle is comparable to free electrons’ mean free path in the bulk metal, effect of surface scattering of conduction electrons on the metal’s dielectric function cannot be ignored. This issue is taken into account in equation (2): 𝑚 (𝜔) = 𝜀 𝑒𝑥𝑝 (𝜔) + 𝜔 𝑝2 𝜔(𝜔 + 𝑖𝛾 𝑏 ) − 𝜔 𝑝2 𝜔[𝜔 + 𝑖(𝛾 𝑏 + 𝛾 𝑠 ] (2) where 𝜀 𝑚 is metal’s dielectric function corrected for size effect, 𝜔 is frequency of incident light, 𝜀 𝑒𝑥𝑝 is the dielectric function of the bulk metal (Ag, Au or Al) obtained from literature, 𝜔 𝑝 and 𝛾 𝑏 are the bulk metal’s plasma frequency and damping rate, respectively, whose values for Ag, Au and Al are given in Table 2 , 𝑖 is the imaginary number, 𝛾 𝑠 is the extra damping of free electrons caused by surface scattering and is given by equation (3): 𝛾 𝑠 = 𝑣 𝐹 𝐿 𝐵 (3) where 𝑣 𝐹 is the Fermi velocity of electrons in metal, and its values for Ag, Au and Al are given in Table 2, and 𝐿 𝐵 is the effective mean free path of free electrons in metallic nanoparticle. For the structure of metallic nanoshell, i.e., silica@metal, 𝐿 𝐵 is given by equation (4), derived by assuming specular reflections of electrons from surfaces of metallic shell: 𝐿 𝐵 = 4(𝑟 𝑜3 − 𝑟 𝑖3 )3(𝑟 𝑜2 + 𝑟 𝑖2 ) (4) where 𝑟 𝑜 and 𝑟 𝑖 are the outer and inner radii of the core-shell structure, respectively. For metallic nanosphere or the silica-coated metallic nanosphere (i.e., metal@silica), 𝐿 𝐵 is given by equation (5), which is derived by setting 𝑟 𝑖 to 0 in equation (4): 𝐿 𝐵 = 43 𝑟 (5) where 𝑟 is the radius of metallic nanosphere or the inner radius of silica-coated metallic nanosphere. Table 2
Plasma frequencies, damping rates and Fermi velocities of bulk metals used in correcting the metals’ dielectric functions for the size effect. 𝜔 𝑝 (eV) 𝛾 𝑏 (eV) 𝑣 𝐹 ( 𝑚/𝑠 ) Ag 9.6 0.0228 1.39 Au 8.55 0.0184 1.40 Al 15.3 0.5984 2.03 For silica without gain material, it is assumed to have a constant refractive index 𝑁 𝑆𝑖 =1.45 . For silica doped with gain material, its refractive index is given by 𝑁 𝑆𝑖 = 1.45 + 𝑖𝑘 (6) where 𝑖 is the imaginary number, and 𝑘 is a negative extinction coefficient constant over all wavelengths, since reported gain materials are able to cover the whole visible wavelength range.
11, 13
Extinction coefficient 𝑘 is positive for lossy media, 0 for non-absorbing media, and negative for gain media. The optimization is carried out with BOBYQA, a local optimization algorithm, which starts from an initial guess of tuning parameters and searches for an optimized set of tuning parameters that give maximum value of 𝐹𝑂𝑀 . Here, the set of tuning parameters are dimensions of the nanostructures shown in Table 1 (i.e., core diameter and shell thickness for metal@silica and silica@metal, or diameter for metal sphere), the value of 𝑘 in equation (6), and resonance peak wavelength 𝜆 𝑅 . The tuning ranges of resonance peak wavelength 𝜆 𝑅 for red, green and blue light are set to be 620 nm to 700 nm, 510 nm to 540 nm, and 440 nm to 460 nm, respectively. The detailed optimization process is as following: for each tuning range of 𝜆 𝑅 , 𝜆 𝑅 is scanned at a step of 1 nm; at each step of 𝜆 𝑅 , BOBYQA is carried out with an initial guess of nanostructure’s dimensions and 𝑘 value; and the set that generates the largest value of 𝐹𝑂𝑀 defined by equation (1) gives the optimized 𝜆 𝑅 , nanostructure’s dimensions and 𝑘 value. For structures without gain material, 𝑘 equals to 0 and is not an adjustable parameter during optimization. The optimized results of nanostructure’s dimensions, 𝑘 values and values of optimized 𝐹𝑂𝑀 are shown in the section of “Results and discussion”.
Results and discussion
In this section, apart from the optimized tuning parameters, and values of optimized
𝐹𝑂𝑀 , the calculated optical spectrums are also presented to give an intuitive view of sharp selective scattering. The spectrums are presented in terms of extinction efficiency ( 𝑄 𝑒𝑥𝑡 ), scattering efficiency ( 𝑄 𝑠𝑐𝑎 ) and absorption efficiency ( 𝑄 𝑎𝑏𝑠 ), which are obtained from dividing their corresponding cross sections: 𝜎 𝑒𝑥𝑡 , 𝜎 𝑠𝑐𝑎 and 𝜎 𝑎𝑏𝑠 , calculated by Mie’s theory,
23, 27 to the geometrical cross section 𝜋𝑅 , where 𝑅 is the overall radius of a core-shell structure (metal@silica or silica@metal) or radius of a nanosphere, i.e., 𝑄 𝑒𝑥𝑡 =𝜎 𝑒𝑥𝑡 /(𝜋𝑅 ) , 𝑄 𝑠𝑐𝑎 = 𝜎 𝑠𝑐𝑎 /(𝜋𝑅 ) , and 𝑄 𝑎𝑏𝑠 = 𝜎 𝑎𝑏𝑠 /(𝜋𝑅 ) . Note that 𝑄 𝑒𝑥𝑡 is equal to the sum of 𝑄 𝑠𝑐𝑎 and 𝑄 𝑎𝑏𝑠 . For the calculated efficiencies shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4, Mie’s theory takes the following parameters as its inputs: the surrounding medium’s dielectric function 𝜀 𝑠 =𝑛 𝑠2 = 2.25 , optimized nanostructure’s dimensions (i.e., core diameter and shell thickness for a core-shell structure, or diameter for a nanosphere), metal’s size-dependent dielectric function given by equation (2), silica’s dielectric function 𝜀 𝑆𝑖 for the core-shell structure (for a structure without gain material, 𝜀 𝑆𝑖 = 𝑁 𝑆𝑖2 = 2.1025 ; for a structure with gain material 𝜀 𝑆𝑖 = 𝑁 𝑆𝑖2 = (1.45 + 𝑖𝑘) , where 𝑁 𝑆𝑖 = 1.45 + 𝑖𝑘 is from equation (6) and the optimized 𝑘 is constant over the whole spectrum). Since one gain material only provides gain in a small wavelength range, a negative 𝑘 over a short wavelength range is more physically meaningful. For this purpose, for those structures with gain material, we have also investigated the effect on value of 𝐹𝑂𝑀 when replacing the wavelength-independent 𝑘 with a gaussian-form 𝑘 . Here, he gaussian-form 𝑘 has the following expression: 𝑘(𝜆) = 𝑘 𝑜𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑙 𝑒 −(𝜆− 𝜆 𝑅 ) (7) where 𝑘 𝑜𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑙 and 𝜆 𝑅 are the optimized 𝑘 value and resonance wavelength respectively for a structure with gain material, 𝜆 is incident light’s wavelength, 𝑎 is associated with gaussian curve’s full width at half maximum (FWHM), and FWHM is assumed to be 30 nm in this work. The gaussian-form 𝑘 is equal to the optimized 𝑘 in Tables 3, 4 and 5 at the resonance wavelength, and decreases in magnitude for wavelengths away from the resonance wavelength. For structures with gain material, their values of 𝐹𝑂𝑀 calculated with gaussian-form 𝑘 , with other optimized parameters unchanged, are also shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5, and their efficiency spectrums calculated with gaussian-form 𝑘 are shown in Figures 5, 6 and 7. Nevertheless, 𝑘 is assumed to be wavelength-independent during optimization and in Figures 2, 3 and 4. Figure 2 shows the efficiency spectrums of the structures optimized for selective scattering of red light, and their corresponding values of 𝐹𝑂𝑀 as well as optimized parameters are shown in Table 3.
Figure 2.
Efficiency spectrums of optimized structures for selective scattering of red ight. The left column, i.e., (a), (c), (e) and (g) are for the optimized structures without gain material, and spectrums of their corresponding structures optimized with gain material are shown in the right column, i.e., (b), (d), (f) and (h). (a) Au sphere without gain. (b) Au@silica with gain. (c) Silica@Au without gain. (d) Silica@Au with gain. (e) Silica@Ag without gain. (f) Silica@Ag with gain. (g) Silica@Al without gain. (h) Silica@Al with gain. For each structure, the optimized parameters and optimized values of
𝐹𝑂𝑀 are tabulated in Table 3 in the same alphabetic order as their respective structure appears in this figure.
Table 3
Optimized tuning parameters and values of optimized
𝐹𝑂𝑀 for the structures mentioned in Figure 2, with the same alphabetic order
Alphabetic order Core Diameter (nm) Shell thickness (nm) 𝑘 Resonance wavelength (nm)
𝐹𝑂𝑀
𝐹𝑂𝑀 with Gaussian 𝑘 (a) 101 620 0.7476 (b) 98 5 -0.4663 620 1.1094 1.4925 (c) 61 23 650 0.7640 (d) 48 10 -1.2888 622 3.17 2.7835 (e) 65 18 620 0.6063 (f) 56 8 -1.1234 620 1.3391 3.1377 (g) 97 25 672 0.4509 (h) 83 25 -0.0677 622 0.4853 0.4856 Figure 3 shows the efficiency spectrums of the structures optimized for selective scattering of green light, and their corresponding value of
𝐹𝑂𝑀 as well as optimized parameters are shown in Table 4.
Figure 3.
Efficiency spectrums of optimized structures for selective scattering of green light. The left column, i.e., (a), (c) and (e) are for the optimized structures without gain material, and spectrums of their corresponding structures optimized with gain material are shown in the right column, i.e., (b), (d) and (f). (a) Ag sphere without gain. (b) g@silica with gain. (c) Silica@Ag without gain. (d) Silica@Ag with gain. (e) Silica@Al without gain. (f) Silica@Al with gain. For each structure, the optimized parameters and optimized values of
𝐹𝑂𝑀 are tabulated in Table 4 in the same alphabetic order as their respective structure appears in this figure.
Table 4
Optimized tuning parameters and values of optimized
𝐹𝑂𝑀 for the structures mentioned in Figure 3, with the same alphabetic order
Alphabetic order Core Diameter (nm) Shell thickness (nm) 𝑘 Resonance wavelength (nm)
𝐹𝑂𝑀
𝐹𝑂𝑀 with Gaussian 𝑘 (a) 78 510 0.8163 (b) 78 15 -0.1743 510 1.1289 1.58 (c) 20 29 510 0.8087 (d) 34 9 -1.2435 511 2.4128 2.6309 (e) 65 18 510 0.6329 (f) 62 18 -0.8485 510 0.6522 0.6597 Figure 4 shows the efficiency spectrums of the structures optimized for selective scattering of green light, and their corresponding value of
𝐹𝑂𝑀 as well as optimized parameters are shown in Table 5.
Figure 4.
Efficiency spectrums of optimized structures for selective scattering of blue light. The left column, i.e., (a), (c) and (e) are the optimized structures without gain material, and spectrums of their corresponding structures optimized with gain material are shown in the right panels, i.e., (b), (d) and (f). (a) Ag sphere without gain. (b) g@silica with gain. (c) Silica@Ag without gain. (d) Silica@Ag with gain. (e) Silica@Al without gain. (f) Silica@Al with gain. For each structure, the optimized parameters and optimized values of
𝐹𝑂𝑀 are tabulated in Table 5 in the same alphabetic order as their respective structure appears in this figure.
Table 5
Optimized tuning parameters and values of optimized
𝐹𝑂𝑀 for the structures mentioned in Figure 4, with the same alphabetic order
Alphabetic order Core Diameter (nm) Shell thickness (nm) 𝑘 Resonance wavelength (nm)
𝐹𝑂𝑀
𝐹𝑂𝑀 with Gaussian 𝑘 (a) 67 460 0.7123 (b) 47 19 -0.1726 443 2.5227 2.4159 (c) 17 24 460 0.6569 (d) 18 27 -1.44 460 0.6923 0.6960 (e) 31 23 440 0.9602 (f) 27 26 -0.8688 440 0.9794 0.9780 For the structures with gain material in Figures 2, 3 and 4, their spectrums are calculated assuming the optimized values of 𝑘 to be wavelength-independent, and Figures 5, 6 and 7 below show the calculated spectrums with the gaussian-form k. Figure 5.
Efficiency spectrums recalculated for structures with gain material in Figure 2, all parameters used in calculation here are same as those used in Figure 2 except that the wavelength-independent 𝑘 in Figure 2 is replaced with gaussian-form 𝑘 here. (a) Au@silica with gain. (b) Silica@Au with gain. (c) Silica@Ag with gain. (d) Silica@Al with gain. Structures of (a), (b), (c) and (d) in this figure correspond to (b), (d), (f) and (h) in Figure 2, respectively. igure 6. Efficiency spectrums recalculated for structures with gain material in Figure 3, all parameters used in calculation here are same as those used in Figure 3 except that the wavelength-independent 𝑘 in Figure 3 is replaced with gaussian-form 𝑘 here. (a) Ag@silica with gain. (b) Silica@Ag with gain. (c) Silica@Al with gain. Structures of (a), (b) and (c) in this figure correspond to (b), (d) and (f) in Figure 3, respectively. Figure 7.
Efficiency spectrums recalculated for structures with gain material in Figure 4, all parameters used in calculation here are same as those used in Figure 4 except that the wavelength-independent 𝑘 in Figure 4 is replaced with gaussian-form 𝑘 here. (a) Ag@silica with gain. (b) Silica@Ag with gain. (c) Silica@Al with gain. Structures of (a), (b) and (c) in this figure correspond to (b), (d) and (f) in Figure 4, respectively. Negative absorption is observed for some structures, which is interpreted as radiation of light. The occurrence of negative absorption is reasonable with the introduction of gain material, as gain material is used in laser to achieve lasing state which is a state of light radiation. By observing Figures 2, 3 and 4, it is obvious that Al-based structures are not suitable for selective scattering, since their resonance peaks are too broad, even though absorptions are low. The efficiency spectrums for Al-based structures do not show apparent improvements even after gain material is introduced. And the broad resonance peaks for Al-based structures can be explained by Al’s low quality factor, which determines strength of resonance, defined by − 𝑅𝑒[𝜀 𝑚 ] 𝐼𝑚[𝜀 𝑚 ]⁄ , over the whole visible wavelength range. Apart from structures of Al, by comparing the calculated efficiency spectrums of the structures without gain material with those of structures with gain material in Figures 2, 3 and 4, it is observed that introducing gain material significantly improves the scattering quality in the sense that the ratios of absorption are decreased, and the resonance scattering peaks become sharper. And the improvements after introducing gain material are confirmed by the increase of values of
𝐹𝑂𝑀 as shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5. The largest values of
𝐹𝑂𝑀 in Tables 3, 4 and 5 (3.17, 2.4128 and 2.5227 respectively) suggest that the most suitable structures for sharp selective scattering of red, green and blue light are the structures of silica@Au with gain material (see Table 3), silica@Ag with gain material (see Table 4), and Ag@silica with gain material (see Table 5), respectively. Their angular distributions of scattering are shown in Figure 8. The results shown in Figure 8 suggest that the scattered light can be viewed from a wide range of angle. The
𝐹𝑂𝑀 values of the most suitable structures (i.e., 3.17 for red light scattering, 2.4128 for green light scattering, and 2.5227 for blue light scattering) are much larger than that reported in previous works,
1, 3-4 where a
𝐹𝑂𝑀 value of 1.5 is considered high, showing a great improvement in selective scattering of red, green and blue light.
Figure 8.
Intensity of the scattered light at the resonant wavelengths versus the scattering angle (in the unit of degree) in polar form for the most suitable structures respectively for selective scattering of red, green and blue light: (a) Silica@Au with gain material (Table 3), (b) Silica@Ag with gain material (Table 4), and (c) Ag@silica with gain material (Table 5). The incident light has a unit intensity and equal intensity for the p- and s- components with respect to the scattering plane. Calculations are carried out with the Mie’s theory.
For the structures with gain material, after replacing wavelength-independent 𝑘 with aussian-form 𝑘 , change in 𝐹𝑂𝑀 is not significant except for the structure of Silica@Ag with gain material (item f in Table 3). For this structure with gaussian-form 𝑘 , 𝐹𝑂𝑀 increases by a factor of 2.34 resulting in a value of 3.1377, and is almost the same as the largest
𝐹𝑂𝑀 of 3.17 in Table 3. This suggests that this structure with gaussian-form 𝑘 is an alternative structure for selective scattering of red light. Among the three most suitable structures, the one for selective scattering of red light, i.e., the structure of silica@Au with gain material (item d in Table 3), has the largest magnitude of optimized 𝑘 which is 1.2888, and this corresponds to a gain value of 𝑐𝑚 −1 , according to the relation 𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 = − , where 𝜆 = 622𝑛𝑚 is this structure’s optimized resonance wavelength. The relation between gain and the emission cross section 𝜎 𝑒 of a single gain material (dye or rare earth ion) is: 𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 =𝜌 ∙ 𝜎 𝑒 , where 𝜌 is gain material’s volume concentration. The usually-known gain material’s emission cross section is of the order of −16 𝑐𝑚 , which corresponds to a maximum gain of the order of 𝑐𝑚 −1 . However, it has been pointed out that the theoretical limit of emission cross section set by quantum mechanics is (2𝜋)⁄ , which is of the order of −10 𝑐𝑚 for visible wavelength range, and is 6 orders larger than −16 𝑐𝑚 . So, a gain value of the order of 𝑐𝑚 −1 may be achieved theoretically. Conclusion
In this work, for the purpose of realizing a transparent projection screen, we have searched for structures that may achieve sharp selective scattering of red, green and blue light based on metallic nanoparticle’s LSPR effect and gain material’s optical compensation. By comparing behaviors of structures optimized with gain material to those without gain material, it is found that for the structures based on Au and Ag, introducing gain material greatly improves the performance in terms of sharper scattering peak and overall lower absorption, while for the Al-based structures little improvement is observed. The most suitable structures for sharp selective scattering of red, green and blue light are respectively found to be silica@Au, silica@Ag and Ag@silica, all with gain material, with their corresponding optimized parameters shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5. And among gain values of the three most suitable structures, the largest one is still within physical limit.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Research Foundation of Singapore (Program Grant No. NRF-CRP13-2014-02).
References
1. Hsu, C. W.; Zhen, B.; Qiu, W.; Shapira, O.; DeLacy, B. G.; Joannopoulos, J. D.; Solja č i č , M., Transparent displays enabled by resonant nanoparticle scattering. Nat. Commun.
5, 3152. 2. Saito, K.; Tatsuma, T., A transparent projection screen based on plasmonic Ag nanocubes. Nanoscale
121 (24), 243106. 4. Ye, Y.; Chen, T.; Zhen, J.; Xu, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, H., Resonant scattering of green light enabled by Ag@TiO2 and its application in a green light projection screen. Nanoscale
10 (5), 2438-2446. 5. Kreibig, U.; Fragstein, C. v., The limitation of electron mean free path in small silver particles.
Zeitschrift für Physik
224 (4), 307-323. 6. Ye, Y.; Chen, T. P.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, X., Effect of Surface Scattering of Electrons on Ratios of Optical Absorption and Scattering to Extinction of Gold Nanoshell. Nanoscale Research Letters
13 (1), 299. 7. Averitt, R. D.; Sarkar, D.; Halas, N. J., Plasmon Resonance Shifts of Au-Coated ${\mathrm{Au}}_{2}S$ Nanoshells: Insight into Multicomponent Nanoparticle Growth. Physical Review Letters
78 (22), 4217-4220. 8. Westcott, S. L.; Jackson, J. B.; Radloff, C.; Halas, N. J., Relative contributions to the plasmon line shape of metal nanoshells. Physical Review B
66 (15), 155431. 9. Raschke, G.; Brogl, S.; Susha, A. S.; Rogach, A. L.; Klar, T. A.; Feldmann, J.; Fieres, B.; Petkov, N.;
Bein, T.; Nichtl, A.; Kürzinger, K., Gold Nanoshells Improve Single Nanoparticle Molecular Sensors.
Nano Letters
16 (10), 1824-1832. 11. Avrutsky, I., Surface plasmons at nanoscale relief gratings between a metal and a dielectric medium with optical gain. Physical Review B
70 (15), 155416. 12. Noginov, M. A.; Zhu, G.; Bahoura, M.; Adegoke, J.; Small, C. E.; Ritzo, B. A.; Drachev, V. P.; Shalaev, V. M., Enhancement of surface plasmons in an Ag aggregate by optical gain in a dielectric medium. Opt. Lett.
31 (20), 3022-3024. 13. Digonnet, M. J., Rare Earth Doped Fiber Lasers and Amplifiers. 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 1993. 14. Lawandy, N. M., Localized surface plasmon singularities in amplifying media. Applied Physics Letters
85 (21), 5040-5042. 15.
Hide, F.; Schwartz, B. J.; Díaz - García, M. A.; Heeger, A. J., Conjugated polymers as solid -state laser materials. Synthetic Metals
91 (1), 35-40. 16. Gordon, J. A.; Ziolkowski, R. W., The design and simulated performance of a coated nano-particle laser. Opt. Express
15 (5), 2622-2653. 17. Li, X. F.; Yu, S. F., Design of low-threshold compact Au-nanoparticle lasers. Opt. Lett.
35 (15), 2535-2537. 18. Campbell, S. D.; Ziolkowski, R. W., Impact of strong localization of the incident power density on the nano-amplifier characteristics of active coated nano-particles. Optics Communications
285 (16), 3341-3352. 19. Zhang, H.; Zhou, J.; Zou, W.; He, M., Surface plasmon amplification characteristics of an active three-layer nanoshell-based spaser. Journal of Applied Physics
112 (7), 074309. 20. Wu, D. J.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, X. W.; Liu, X. J., An active metallic nanomatryushka with two similar super-resonances. Journal of Applied Physics
116 (1), 013502. 21. Kelly, K. L.; Coronado, E.; Zhao, L. L.; Schatz, G. C., The Optical Properties of Metal anoparticles:
The Influence of Size, Shape, and Dielectric Environment. J. Phys. Chem. B
107 (3), 668-677. 22. Bohren, C. F.; Huffman, D. R., Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. John Wiley & Sons: 2008. 23. Quinten, M., Optical properties of nanoparticle systems: Mie and beyond. John Wiley & Sons: 2010. 24. Kreibig, U.; Vollmer, M., Optical properties of metal clusters. Springer Science & Business Media: 2013; Vol. 25. 25. Palik, E. D., Handbook of optical constants of solids. Academic press: 1998; Vol. 3. 26. Prodan, E.; Nordlander, P., Structural Tunability of the Plasmon Resonances in Metallic Nanoshells. Nano Letters
42 (9), 1710-1720. 28. Blaber, M. G.; Arnold, M. D.; Ford, M. J., Search for the Ideal Plasmonic Nanoshell: The Effects of Surface Scattering and Alternatives to Gold and Silver. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
113 (8), 3041-3045. 29. Moroz, A., Electron Mean Free Path in a Spherical Shell Geometry. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
112 (29), 10641-10652. 30. Powell, M. J., The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Cambridge NA Report NA2009/06, University of Cambridge, Cambridge . 31. Klyshko, D. N., Photons and Nonlinear Optics. Gordon: New York, 1988.. 31. Klyshko, D. N., Photons and Nonlinear Optics. Gordon: New York, 1988.