aa r X i v : . [ a s t r o - ph ] N ov Signals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens
Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich ∗ Institut für Theoretische Physik/AstrophysikJ. W. Goethe UniversitätD-60438 Frankfurt am Main, GermanyE-mail: [email protected]
The modern phase diagram of strongly interacting matter reveals a rich structure at high-densitiesdue to phase transitions related to the chiral symmetry of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) andthe phenomenon of color superconductivity. These exotic phases have a significant impact onhigh-density astrophysics, such as the properties of neutron stars, and the evolution of astrophys-ical systems as proto-neutron stars, core-collapse supernovae and neutron star mergers. Mostrecent pulsar mass measurements and constraints on neutron star radii are critically discussed.Astrophysical signals for exotic matter and phase transitions in high-density matter proposed re-cently in the literature are outlined. A strong first order phase transition leads to the emergenceof a third family of compact stars besides white dwarfs and neutron stars. The different micro-physics of quark matter results in an enhanced r-mode stability window for rotating compact starscompared to normal neutron stars. Future telescope and satellite data will be used to extract sig-nals from phase transitions in dense matter in the heavens and will reveal properties of the phasesof dense QCD. Spectral line profiles out of x-ray bursts will determine the mass-radius ratio ofcompact stars. Gravitational wave patterns from collapsing neutron stars or neutron star mergerswill even be able to constrain the stiffness of the quark matter equation of state. Future astrophys-ical data can therefore provide a crucial cross-check to the exploration of the QCD phase diagramwith the heavy-ion program of the CBM detector at the FAIR facility.
Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement 4th International WorkshopJuly 9-13 2007GSI Darmstadt,Germany ∗ Speaker. c (cid:13) Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlikeLicence. http://pos.sissa.it/ ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens
Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich
Hadrons m N neutron stars nuclei T T c c m / 3 RHIC, LHC
FAIR
PlasmaQuark−Gluon early universe
SuperconductivityColor m Figure 1:
A sketch of the phase diagram of QCD for different temperatures T and quark chemical potential m . The heavy-ion program of FAIR at GSI Darmstadt will explore the phase transition line at high baryondensities.
1. Introduction
The phase diagram of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) captures the bulk properties of stronglyinteracting matter at extreme temperatures and baryon number densities. A modern version of theQCD phase diagram is sketched in Fig. 1. There are striking similarities to the phase diagram ofwater (just replace density with pressure) if one associates the solid phase at small temperaturesand high densities with the colour-superconducting phase, the liquid phase at high temperatures anddensities with the quark-gluon plasma (QGP), and the gas phase at low densities with the hadrongas. There is even a triple point where all phases are in equilibrium and last but not least a criticalendpoint . Note, that the QCD phase transition lines are related to the chiral phase transition andsymmetry arguments not to the deconfinement phase transition.The phase diagram at small baryon density and high temperature will be explored by the heavy-ion program of the LHC at CERN and is the physics of the early universe at about 10 − s after thebig bang. The heavy-ion program of CBM at the FAIR facility at GSI Darmstadt will probe theproperties of QCD matter at high baryon densities and nonvanishing temperatures [1]. Interestingly,this part of the QCD phase diagram is of particular interest for high-density astrophysics. Typicaldensities and temperatures encountered in simulations of core-collapse supernovae, proto-neutronstar evolution, and neutron star mergers reach temperatures of 50 MeV and densities of severaltimes normal nuclear matter density, well in the range of the estimates for the location of thephase transition line(s) of QCD. In all these astrophysical systems, the nuclear equation of state(EoS) serves as an essential ingredient, so that the QCD phase transition can leave an imprint inastrophysical observations. Here, the existence of a strong phase transition in a certain density and Of course, the physics of the phase transitions is entirely different because the QGP is a plasma phase, not a liquidphase of hadrons. ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich
Figure 2:
Compilation of radio pulsar mass measurements (taken from [11], by courtesy of Ingrid Stairs). temperature range suffices for our purposes not the exact location. An outline of possible signalsfor the QCD phase transition in the heavens will be the topic of this contribution thereby updatingRef. [2]. The study of the role of QCD in high-density astrophysics has emerged as an extremelyactive field of research. On account of this, I apologise beforehand, that the list of signals discussedhere can neither be exhaustive nor complete; a supplementary exposition with relations to heavy-ion physics can be found in [3 – 6] and a general review on strange quark matter in compact starsin [7].
2. High-density astrophysics
Matter under extreme densities can be found in astrophysical scenarios involving compactobjects. In core-collapse supernovae a star with a zero-age main sequence mass of eight solarmasses or more, collapses to a hot proto-neutron star and then eventually to a black hole. Themodelling of core-collapse supernovae has evolved to new generations of simulation codes, withthe first three-dimensional simulations, modelling of Boltzmann neutrino transport, and inclusionof rotation and magnetic fields (for a recent review see e.g. [8]). Earlier models did not explode,so the question of missing physics was raised [9], the nuclear EoS was mentioned in this context.Just recently, it turned out, that an instability can generate a successful explosion, the standingaccretion shock instability SASI [10]. In any case, the possible role and impact of the nuclear EoSfor successful supernova explosions remains to be explored in future simulations.If the proto-neutron star cools down (and does not collapse to a black hole) a neutron staris born in the aftermath of the core-collapse supernova. These compact massive stars constitute3 ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens
Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich the densest material so far being directly observed in the sky. Typical radii of 10 km and massesof one to two solar masses give average densities between two and four times normal nuclearmatter density. The density in the core of a neutron star can be even substantially larger, whichdepends solely on the behaviour of the high-density EoS. One key property of a neutron star isits mass which can be measured quite precisely by observing binary radio pulsars. A pulsar is arotating neutron star, a binary pulsar one with a companion star, which might be either a normalstar, a white-dwarf or another neutron star. If the companion star is a white-dwarf or a neutronstar, corrections from the Keplerian motion due to effects from general relativity can be used todetermine the mass quite precisely, the accuracy is just a matter of observation time.A rather recent compilation from 2006 of radio pulsars is depicted in Fig. 2, see [11] fordetails. More than 1600 radio pulsars are known but only a few of them are binary pulsars. Themass of the famous Hulse-Taylor pulsar has now been measured to M = ( . ± . ) M ⊙ ,the uncertainty being comparable to the one for the gravitational constant G [12]. Thanks to arecent flurry of activities in detailed radio scans for pulsars, many new binary pulsars have beendiscovered in the last few years and there are many more to come. Particularly massive neutron starsmight be in pulsar–white dwarf systems due to accretion of the neutron star from its companionduring the evolutional history of the binary. Indeed, first measurements reported a quite largemass for the pulsar J0751+1807 of M = . − . M ⊙ (2 s ) [13]. However, new data corrected thepulsar mass to only 1 . M ⊙ with a 68% confidence range of 1.14 to 1.40 solar masses [14] (therewas a problem with the on-line folding ephemeris used for the oldest data which could only bedetected once new data were added). On the other hand, new mass limits were announced at theMontreal conference on pulsars. The mass of the pulsar J0621+1002 was determined to be 1 . M ⊙ with a 68% confidence range of 1.53 to 1.80 solar masses [15]. A new upper mass limit has beenextracted by combining data from the pulsars Terzan 5I and J [16] with the pulsar B1516+02B [17].Under the assumption that the observed advances of periastron are due only to general relativity(as opposed to companion mass quadrupole moments), there is a 99% probability that at least oneof the three neutron stars has a mass greater than 1 . M ⊙ . Finally, the mass measurement of thepulsar J1748–2021B with a median of 2 . M ⊙ results in a lower mass limit of M > M ⊙ with a99% confidence level [17]. If confirmed the latter result would be sensational, but the total systemmass is so large that it could in principle also be a double neutron star system.Present limits on the radius and mass of neutron stars are more model dependent (a verypromising procedure of determining the mass and redshift of a neutron star by relying just oneffects of the warpage of space-time will be given in the outlook on future observation capabilities).The recent analysis of the x-ray burster EXO 0748–676 [19] uses as input inter alia the redshiftextracted from the analysis of spectral lines [20]. For a critical assessment on the assumptionsmade in [19] I refer the reader to Ref. [21]. In any case, the large mass and radius extracted of M ≥ . ± . M ⊙ and R ≥ . ± . ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich M a ss M [ M ] Neutron star(DBHF)Quark star(QCD O( a s2 )) Hybrid(2SC+HHJ)Hybrid(2SC+DBHF) E X O - s s Hybrid, mixed(CFL+APR)
Figure 3:
Mass-radius relation for quark stars and hybrid stars showing that quark matter inside compactstars still allows for rather large masses and radii (taken from [18]).
A rather common misconception relates the appearance of quark matter to a substantial soft-ening of the EoS which is actually not correct. The EoS becomes softer for every new particlespecies appearing in nuclear matter, as hyperons or kaon condensation, as a new degree of freedomopens a new Pauli depth filling low-lying Fermi levels and therefore lowering the total pressurefor a given baryon density. The quark phase on the other hand is a completely new phase, not amere addition to the hadronic degrees of freedom. With our present (poor) knowledge about theproperties of strongly interacting matter at high baryon densities, the relation between pressure andenergy density is basically unknown. Interactions between quarks can result in rather large masses(see the perturbative QCD calculation in Fig. 3). That pure quark stars can be quite massive is nota particularly new result, it has been known at least since the classic works on strange stars withinthe MIT bag model [22 – 24] with a typical maximum mass of 2 . M ⊙ . However, there the stabilityis given by the bag constant, i.e. the nontrivial vacuum of QCD. In either case, the EoS of quarkmatter turns out to be strikingly similar in both approaches [25] and large masses are possible forquark stars (see below).
3. Hunting down strange quark matter in the heavens
There have been numerous signals proposed in the literature for the presence of quark matteror a phase transition to it in astrophysical systems. Some signals include an ’exotic’ mass-radiusrelation of compact stars, rapidly rotating pulsars due to an r-mode stability window, enhancedcooling of neutron stars (see the contribution of David Blaschke [26]), and gamma-ray bursts bytransition to strange quark matter (GRBs without a supernova, late x-ray emission, long quiescenttimes etc.). For gravitational wave signals of phase transitions, astrophysical systems of interestinvolve binary neutron star collisions, collapse of a neutron star to a hybrid star, and the r-modespin-down of hybrid stars. 5 ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens
Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich
Radius (km) M / M s un B =200 MeV B =145 MeV L =2 m L =3 m Figure 4:
The mass-radius relation for pure quark stars within the MIT bag model (long-dashed lines) andwithin perturbative QCD calculation to order a s (solid lines, see [25, 34] for details). In fact, the notion of the QCD phase transition has been modelled in the past mainly usingthe MIT bag model or the assumption that there is a transition from hadronic matter to (free)quark matter. Modern investigations are more based on the underlying properties of dense QCD,incorporating that the true transition in dense QCD originates from chiral symmetry rather thandeconfinement. The phase diagram of QCD for astrophysical applications has been worked out indetail in [27] incorporating effects from color-superconductivity in b equilibrium and in neutrino-trapped matter [28]. Besides the phases and phase transition lines depicted in Fig. 1 many morehave been found, due to different pairing patterns of the quarks: normal quark phase, two-flavorcolor superconducting phase (2SC), gapless 2SC phase, color-flavor locked phase (CFL), gaplessCFL phase, and metallic CFL phase (for the original literature see [29 – 33]).It should be stressed again that the existence of the phases and phase transition lines are basedon symmetry arguments! However, the location in the phase diagram can not be fixed in a modelindependent way, so that it is not clear which phase is realized in nature e.g. in the core of a neutronstar or a proto-neutron star. Unfortunately, this statement implies that the EoS for quark matter isequally undetermined as well as its matching to the low density hadronic part. Some basic insightscan be extracted by considering pure quark matter and pure quark stars first.The typical mass-radius relation for pure quark stars (strange stars) is shown in Fig. 4 forthe MIT bag model (see [23, 24]) and for a calculation using perturbative QCD up to order a s [25]. The compact star mass increases with the radius M (cid:181) R , i.e. the average density is aboutconstant. The maximum mass depends crucially on the chosen value of the MIT bag constant orthe choice of the renormalisation subtraction point L . Interestingly, the mass-radius curves of bothapproaches lie very close to each other, despite the completely different approaches. Note, thatthe maximum mass of quark stars can reach values of 2 . M ⊙ with a radius of 12 km, the sametypical values as for ordinary neutron stars. The mass-radius relation of pure quark stars is actually6 ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich quite generic, as they are selfbound stars stabilised by interactions not by gravity. The commonfeatures are that the pressure vanishes at a finite energy density, so that the mass-radius relationstarts at the origin (ignoring a possible crust) and arbitrarily small masses and radii are possible.The mass-radius curves follow a scaling relation proportional to the critical energy density wherethe pressure vanishes for the MIT bag model the mass and radius scale with the bag constant as B / [22]. In contrast, ordinary neutron stars are bound by gravity, the pressure is nonvanishing fora nonvanishing energy density, so that the mass-radius relation starts at large radii with a minimumneutron star mass of M ∼ . M ⊙ at R ∼
200 km. Strange stars have similar masses and radii,and if there is a nuclear crust, also similar surface properties. However, there are astrophysicalobservables which could reveal the existence of a strange star or strange quark matter, as extremelysmall compact star masses and radii, small and light white dwarfs (strange dwarfs) with unusualmass-radius relation due to a strange star core [35, 36], super-Eddington luminosity from bare,hot strange stars [37] and explosive events due to the conversion of neutron stars to strange stars.However, pure quark stars can only exist if the strange matter hypothesis holds, which hypothesisesthat strange quark matter is absolutely stable.For a probably more realistic scenario one has to match quark matter to hadronic matter, sothat the compact star consists of both types of matter, a so-called hybrid star. To be more precisehere, one has to take into account the transition from the chirally restored phase (’quark matter’)to the chirally broken one (’hadronic matter’). For simplicity, I stick to the traditional terms ofquark matter and ordinary hadronic matter in the following. If the chiral phase transition is of firstorder as suggested by the QCD phase diagram, Fig. 1, there are two extreme possibilities for thematching. Either, the chiral transition is weakly first order (or there is no true phase transition),then there is just one type of compact star (an ordinary neutron star). Or the chiral phase transitionis strongly first-order, then two types of compact stars are possible with a new stable solution atsmaller radii. This new stable solution is sometimes called a quark star twin or a third family ofcompact stars [38 – 42]. Note, that stars of the third family are hybrid stars. The two different stablesolutions can be distinguished by their core composition, the second family has just a mixed phasein the core while the third family consists of a pure quark matter core. Note, that the new solutionto the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations is not only stable but is possible for any kind of firstorder phase transition (also hypothetical hadronic ones, see [43]). That means also that a strongphase transition within color-superconducting quark matter can generate compact star twins, likethe transition from the 2SC to the CFL phase [44].There have been several astrophysical signals proposed specifically for a phase transitionand/or a third family of compact stars as e.g.: the spontaneous spin-up of pulsars [45, 46], the’rising twin’ feature of the mass-radius relation [42], the existence of sub-millisecond pulsars andgravitational wave bursts due to r-mode (in)stabilities [47], and gamma-ray bursts with late x-rayemission and long quiescent times [48]. Other possible observables include the emission of gravita-tional waves, g -rays, and neutrino from the collapse of a neutron star to the third family, a possiblesecondary shock wave in supernova explosions, as well as gravitational waves from colliding neu-tron stars.The observation of a 1122Hz signal from the low-mass x-ray binary XTE J1739 [49] triggereda reanalysis of the limiting rotation frequencies of compact stars (note that it is not clear at presentwhether this frequency really corresponds to the rotation frequency of the pulsar, unfortunately).7 ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich
Besides the standard Kepler limit, the compact star can only rotate fast in a certain temperaturerange (see [50] and references therein). Other regions are excluded by the so-called r-mode insta-bility, i.e. the compact star slows down rapidly due to the emission of gravitational waves. Thisinstability window depends on the microphysics of dense matter, hence, it is different for ordinarynuclear matter and for quark matter. Accreting neutron stars have typical inner temperatures of T = K or higher. Ordinary neutron star matter (even with hyperons) would be unstable withrespect to the r-mode at a high rotation frequency around this temperature. On the other hand,hybrid stars are stable thanks to the significantly different bulk viscosity of quark matter (see e.g[51]). Indeed, it was demonstrated by [52] that only compact stars with quark matter can rotatethat fast at a temperature of T = K . These are exciting prospects and the confirmation of theexistence of an accreting submillisecond pulsar is eagerly awaited.Colliding neutron stars, stars collapsing to black holes or collapsing compact stars are allcandidates for the sources of gamma-ray bursts. These highly energetic events in the sky releaseenergies similar to the ones of supernovae and occur about once per day. There is a special subclassof gamma-ray burst with long quiescent times (more than 40 seconds) between two bursts [48]. Thecharacteristics of the two bursts before and after quiescence are quite similar, which points towardsa dormant inner engine and not to different physics as would be the case for shocks outside theinner engine. A possible source of the gamma-ray bursts could then be a compact star experiencingtwo consecutive phase transitions: first to quark matter (chiral phase transition) and then to color-superconducting matter. The energy release of both QCD transitions is huge and well in the rangeof that extracted from gamma-ray burst spectra.
4. The hunt for astrophysical signals of QCD in the near future
There are presently a large number of telescopes and satellites relevant for the observationof the properties of QCD in the heavens, such as the radio telescopes at the Arecibo, Parkes, Jo-drell Bank, and Green Bank Observatories, the Hubble Space Telescope, the Very Large Telescope(VLT) of the European Southern Observatory, and the Keck Telescopes at Hawaii in the optical,the x-ray satellites Chandra and XMM-Newton, as well as the gravitational wave observatoriesGEO600, LIGO, and VIRGO, and the neutrino telescopes of Super-Kamiokande and the SudburyNeutrino Observatory (SNO). The sensitivities in all these areas will be boosted and extended byfuture telescopes, observatories and satellites: for radio observation the Square Kilometre Array(SKA), for optical observations the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the successor of theHubble Space Telescope, and the Extremely Large Telescope, for x-ray observations the satellitemissions Constellation-X and XEUS, the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) for the detec-tion of gravitational waves, and the Underground Nucleon decay and neutrino Observatory (UNO)for the detection of even extragalactic supernova neutrinos.A few astrophysical observables proposed which can be measured with those future detectorsare listed in the following.For the first time, a double pulsar system (PSR J0737-303) was detected, which is a systemof two neutron stars where the radio signal of both pulsars has been measured [53]. This systemat present provides the best tests of General Relativity in the strong field regime [54]. For doublepulsar systems, the moment of inertia can be measured, which will give constraints on the radius8 ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens
Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich of neutron stars [55 – 57]. The mass of the pulsar of interest is already very precisely known M A = . ( ) M ⊙ [54]. If the moment of inertia can be determined with an accuracy of 5 to 10%it will provide a tight constraint on the mass-radius relation and on the nuclear EoS just by usinggeneral relativity [55 – 57].Accreting neutron stars can reveal themselves by x-ray bursts which originate from the surfaceof the neutron star. The profile of the emitted spectral lines are modified by the strong space-timewarpage which depends on the compactness of the compact star, the ratio of the mass to the radius.The warped spectral shape can then be used as a model-independent measurement of the mass-radius relation of compact stars. With Constellation-X the mass-radius ratio is expected to benarrowed down to within 5% accuracy [58, 59]. The method has been applied successfully for thepulsar J0437–4715 by using the present x-ray data. The radius is limited within 99.9% confidenceto R > . . M ⊙ [60].Gravitational wave astronomy has opened up an entirely new window to ’listen’ to the uni-verse. Sources of gravitational waves are suspected to be, for example: nonspherical rotatingneutron stars, colliding neutron stars and black-holes, and supernovae. Gravitational wave detec-tors are observing right now (as LIGO and GEO600). They just set new limits on the gravitationalwave emission of pulsars getting close to the spin-down limit [61]. Quark matter in the core ofneutron stars could in fact sustain large deformations and would be visible in a sizable emission ofgravitational waves [62, 63]. The spin-down of hybrid stars due to r-mode instabilities could leadto an observable gravitational wave burst [47]. There are several numerical simulations of gravi-tational wave emission reported in the literature which include effects from a phase transition toquark matter at high densities. In binary neutron star mergers with a quark core, a signal is clearlyseen in the Fourier spectrum of the gravitational wave signal [64]. In modelling binary strangequark star collision, higher frequencies are possible before ’touch-down’ in comparison to normalneutron stars [65]. The collapse of an ordinary neutron star to a hybrid star with a quark matter coreproduces characteristic gravitational waves [66, 67]. The authors adopt a simple polytropic EoS forthe quark matter phase with an adiabatic index of G = .
75 to 1.95. Remarkably, the pattern of thegravitational wave signal turns out to be highly sensitive to the stiffness of the quark matter EoS[66, 67]. Finally, the collapse of neutron stars to hybrid stars due to a phase transition in neutronstars will generate a gravitational wave background [68]. The background of such gravitationalwaves could be detectable with future space based detectors. The signal could be even larger thanthe one for conventional type II supernovae [68].
5. Summary
There is a unique one-to-one relation between the nuclear equation of state and the mass-radiusrelation of compact stars. The various phase transitions in dense QCD matter lead to a rich varietyof astrophysical signals to be revealed by e.g. exotic mass-radius relation (the existence of a thirdfamily of compact stars), x-ray observations of x-ray binaries, gamma-ray bursts, gravitationalwave emissions and observations of core collapse supernovae. There are lots of opportunities for across-check between heavy-ion physics and high-density astrophysics. Clearly, the future is brightfor probing the densest material known in the universe in the coming years with the CBM detectoron earth and with astrophysical detectors in the heavens.9 ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens
Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich
Acknowledgments
I thank my colleagues and friends for many fruitful discussions on the physics of QCD matterin the last few years and during this conference, in particular I thank Alessandro Drago for pro-viding me with a long list of possible signals for quark matter in the sky. I am indebted to IngridStairs for a detailed update on the most recent and unpublished pulsar mass measurements andclarifying corrections to the manuscript. Finally, I thank Matthias Hempel, Giuseppe Pagliara, andIrina Sagert from the compact star group in Frankfurt for numerous conversations and for theircollaboration.
References [1] Volker Friese for the CBM collaboration, contribution to these proceedings.[2] J. Schaffner-Bielich, “Strange quark matter in stars: A general overview,”
J. Phys. G (2005)S651–657, astro-ph/0412215 .[3] T. Klähn, D. Blaschke, S. Typel, E. van Dalen, A. Faessler, C. Fuchs, T. Gaitanos, H. Grigorian,A. Ho, E. Kolomeitsev, M. Miller, G. Röpke, J. Trümper, D. Voskresensky, F. Weber, and H. Wolter,“Constraints on the high-density nuclear equation of state from the phenomenology of compact starsand heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C (2006) 035802, nucl-th/0602038 .[4] C. Fuchs, “Recent progress constraining the nuclear equation of state from astrophysics and heavy ionreactions,” arXiv:0706.0130 [nucl-th] .[5] I. Sagert, M. Wietoska, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and C. Sturm, “Is a soft nuclear equation of stateextracted from heavy- ion data incompatible with pulsar data?,” arXiv:0708.2810[astro-ph] .[6] D. Blaschke, T. Klahn, and F. Sandin, “Equation of state at high densities and modern compact starobservations,” arXiv:0708.4216 [nucl-th] .[7] F. Weber, “Strange quark matter and compact stars,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. (2005) 193–288, astro-ph/0407155 .[8] H.-T. Janka, K. Langanke, A. Marek, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and B. Müller, “Theory of Core-CollapseSupernovae,” Phys. Rept. (2007) 38–74, astro-ph/0612072 .[9] R. Buras, M. Rampp, H. T. Janka, and K. Kifonidis, “Improved Models of Stellar Core Collapse andStill no Explosions: What is Missing?,”
Phys. Rev. Lett. (2003) 241101, astro-ph/0303171 .[10] H.-T. Janka, A. Marek, and F.-S. Kitaura, “Neutrino-driven explosions twenty years after SN1987A,” arXiv:0706.3056 [astro-ph] (2007).[11] I. H. Stairs, “Masses of radio pulsars,” J. Phys. G (2006) S259–S265.[12] J. M. Weisberg and J. H. Taylor, “The Relativistic Binary Pulsar B1913+16: Thirty Years ofObservations and Analysis,” in Binary Radio Pulsars , F. A. Rasio and I. H. Stairs, eds., vol. 328 of
Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , pp. 25–+. 2005. astro-ph/0407149 .[13] D. J. Nice, E. M. Splaver, I. H. Stairs, O. Löhmer, A. Jessner, M. Kramer, and J. M. Cordes, “A 2.1Solar Mass Pulsar Measured by Relativistic Orbital Decay,”
Astrophys. J. (2005) 1242–1249, astro-ph/0508050 .[14] David Nice and Ingrid Stairs, private communication. ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich[15] Laura Kasian, David Nice and Ingrid Stairs, private communication.[16] S. M. Ransom, J. W. T. Hessels, I. H. Stairs, P. C. C. Freire, F. Camilo, V. M. Kaspi, and D. L. Kaplan,“Twenty-One Millisecond Pulsars in Terzan 5 Using the Green Bank Telescope,”
Science (2005)892–896, astro-ph/0501230 .[17] Paolo Freire, talk given at the conference ’40 Years of Pulsars’, Montreal, August 12–17, 2007, seens2007.org.[18] M. Alford, D. Blaschke, A. Drago, T. Klähn, G. Pagliara, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, “Quark matter incompact stars?,”
Nature (2006) E7–E8, astro-ph/0606524 .[19] F. Özel, “EXO 0748-676 Rules out Soft Equations of State for Neutron Star Matter,”
Nature (2006) 1115–1117, astro-ph/0605106 .[20] J. Cottam, F. Paerels, and M. Mendez, “Gravitationally redshifted absorption lines in the X-ray burstspectra of a neutron star,”
Nature (2002) 51–54, astro-ph/0211126 .[21] F. M. Walter and J. M. Lattimer, “Nuclear astrophysics: Inside information,”
Nature Physics (2006)443–444.[22] E. Witten, “Cosmic separation of phases,” Phys. Rev. D (1984) 272.[23] P. Haensel, J. L. Zdunik, and R. Schaeffer, “Strange quark stars,” Astron. Astrophys. (1986) 121.[24] C. Alcock, E. Farhi, and A. Olinto, “Strange Stars,”
Astrophys. J. (1986) 261.[25] E. S. Fraga, R. D. Pisarski, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, “Small, dense quark stars from perturbativeQCD,”
Phys. Rev. D (2001) 121702(R), hep-ph/0101143 .[26] David Blascke, contribution to these proceedings.[27] S. B. Rüster, V. Werth, M. Buballa, I. A. Shovkovy, and D. H. Rischke, “The phase diagram of neutralquark matter: Self-consistent treatment of quark masses,” Phys. Rev. D (2005) 034004, hep-ph/0503184 .[28] S. B. Rüster, V. Werth, M. Buballa, I. A. Shovkovy, and D. H. Rischke, “The phase diagram of neutralquark matter: The effect of neutrino trapping,” Phys. Rev. D (2006) 034025, hep-ph/0509073 .[29] M. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, “QCD at finite baryon density: Nucleon droplets and colorsuperconductivity,” Phys. Lett. B (1998) 247, hep-ph/9711395 .[30] R. Rapp, T. Schäfer, E. V. Shuryak, and M. Velkovsky, “Diquark Bose condensates in high densitymatter and instantons,”
Phys. Rev. Lett. (1998) 53, hep-ph/9711396 .[31] M. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, “Color-flavor locking and chiral symmetry breaking in highdensity QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B (1999) 443, hep-ph/9804403 .[32] I. Shovkovy and M. Huang, “Gapless two-flavor color superconductor,”
Phys. Lett.
B564 (2003) 205, hep-ph/0302142 .[33] M. Alford, C. Kouvaris, and K. Rajagopal, “Gapless color-flavor-locked quark matter,”
Phys. Rev.Lett. (2004) 222001, hep-ph/0311286 .[34] E. S. Fraga, R. D. Pisarski, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, “New class of compact stars at high density,” Nucl. Phys.
A702 (2002) 217–223, nucl-th/0110077 .[35] N. K. Glendenning, C. Kettner, and F. Weber, “A Possible new class of dense white dwarfs,”
Phys.Rev. Lett. (1995) 3519–3521. ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich[36] G. J. Mathews et al. , “Analysis of white dwarfs with strange-matter cores,”
J. Phys.
G32 (2006)747–760, astro-ph/0604366 .[37] D. Page and V. V. Usov, “Thermal Evolution and Light Curves of Young Bare Strange Stars,”
Phys.Rev. Lett. (2002) 131101, astro-ph/0204275 .[38] U. H. Gerlach, “Equation of state at supranuclear densities and the existence of a third family ofsuperdense stars,” Phys. Rev. (1968) 1325.[39] B. Kämpfer, “On the Possibility of Stable Quark and Pion Condensed Stars,”
J. Phys. A (1981)L471–L475.[40] P. Haensel and M. Prószy´nski, “Pion condensation in cold dense matter and neutron stars,” Astrophys.J. (1982) 306–320.[41] N. K. Glendenning and C. Kettner, “Non-Identical Neutron Star Twins,”
Astron. Astrophys. (2000) L9, astro-ph/9807155 .[42] K. Schertler, C. Greiner, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and M. H. Thoma, “Quark phases in neutron stars and a’third family’ of compact stars as a signature for phase transitions,”
Nucl. Phys.
A677 (2000) 463, astro-ph/0001467 .[43] J. Schaffner-Bielich, M. Hanauske, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, “Phase transition to hyperon matter inneutron stars,”
Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002) 171101, astro-ph/0005490 .[44] F. Sandin and D. Blaschke, “The quark core of protoneutron stars in the phase diagram of quarkmatter,” Phys. Rev. D (2007) 125013, astro-ph/0701772 .[45] N. K. Glendenning, S. Pei, and F. Weber, “Signal of quark deconfinement in the timing structure ofpulsar spin-down,” Phys. Rev. Lett. (1997) 1603.[46] J. L. Zdunik, M. Bejger, P. Haensel, and E. Gourgoulhon, “Phase transitions in rotating neutron starscores: back bending, stability, corequakes and pulsar timing,” Astron. Astrophys. (2006) 747–758, astro-ph/0509806 .[47] A. Drago, G. Pagliara, and Z. Berezhiani, “Short gravitational wave bursts induced by r-modespin-down of hybrid stars,”
Astron. Astrophys. (2006) 1053–1060, gr-qc/0405145 .[48] A. Drago and G. Pagliara, “Quiescent Times in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Hints of a Dormant InnerEngine,”
Astrophys. J. (2007) 1227–1234, astro-ph/0512602 .[49] P. Kaaret, Z. Prieskorn, J. J. M. I. Zand, S. Brandt, N. Lund, S. Mereghetti, D. Götz, E. Kuulkers, andJ. A. Tomsick, “Evidence of 1122 Hz X-Ray Burst Oscillations from the Neutron Star X-RayTransient XTE J1739-285,”
Astrophys. J. Lett. (2007) L97–L100, astro-ph/0611716 .[50] J. Madsen, “Probing strange stars and color superconductivity by r-mode instabilities in millisecondpulsars,”
Phys. Rev. Lett. (2000) 10–13, astro-ph/9912418 .[51] B. A. Sa’d, I. A. Shovkovy, and D. H. Rischke, “Bulk viscosity of strange quark matter: Urca versusnon- leptonic processes,” Phys. Rev. D (2007) 125004, astro-ph/0703016 .[52] A. Drago, G. Pagliara, and I. Parenti, “A compact star rotating at 1122 Hz and the r-mode instability,” arXiv:0704.1510 [astro-ph] (2007).[53] A. Lyne, M. Burgay, M. Kramer, A. Possenti, R. Manchester, F. Camilo, M. McLaughlin, D. Lorimer,N. D’Amico, B. Joshi, J. Reynolds, and P. Freire, “A Double-Pulsar System - A Rare Laboratory forRelativistic Gravity and Plasma Physics,” Science (2004) 1153–1157, astro-ph/0401086 . ignals of the QCD Phase Transition in the Heavens Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich[54] M. Kramer, I. Stairs, R. Manchester, M. McLaughlin, A. Lyne, R. Ferdman, M. Burgay, D. Lorimer,A. Possenti, N. D’Amico, J. Sarkissian, G. Hobbs, J. Reynolds, P. Freire, and F. Camilo, “Tests ofgeneral relativity from timing the double pulsar,”
Science (2006) 97–102, astro-ph/0609417 .[55] I. A. Morrison, T. W. Baumgarte, S. L. Shapiro, and V. R. Pandharipande, “The Moment of Inertia ofthe Binary Pulsar J0737-3039A: Constraining the Nuclear Equation of State,”
Astrophys. J. (2004) L135–L138, astro-ph/0411353 .[56] J. M. Lattimer and B. F. Schutz, “Constraining the Equation of State with Moment of InertiaMeasurements,”
Astrophys. J. (2005) 979–984, astro-ph/0411470 .[57] M. Bejger, T. Bulik, and P. Haensel, “Moments of inertia of the binary pulsars J0737-3039A,B and thedense matter EOS,”
Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. (2005) 635, astro-ph/0508105 .[58] T. E. Strohmayer, “Future Probes of the Neutron Star Equation of State Using X-ray Bursts,”
AIPConf. Proc. (2004) 245–252, astro-ph/0401465 .[59] S. Bhattacharyya, M. C. Miller, T. E. Strohmayer, F. K. Lamb, and C. B. Markwardt, “Understandinghigh-density matter through analysis of surface spectral lines and burst oscillations from accretingneutron stars,”
Advances in Space Research (2006) 2765–2767, astro-ph/0512419 .[60] S. Bogdanov, G. B. Rybicki, and J. E. Grindlay, “Constraints on Neutron Star Properties from X-rayObservations of Millisecond Pulsars,” astro-ph/0612791 (2006).[61] LIGO Scientific
Collaboration, B. Abbott et al. , “Upper limits on gravitational wave emission from78 radio pulsars,”
Phys. Rev.
D76 (2007) 042001, gr-qc/0702039 .[62] B. J. Owen, “Maximum elastic deformations of compact stars with exotic equations of state,”
Phys.Rev. Lett. (2005) 211101, astro-ph/0503399 .[63] B. Haskell, N. Andersson, D. I. Jones, and L. Samuelsson, “Is LIGO already constraining theparameters of QCD?,” arXiv:0708.2984 [gr-qc] .[64] R. Oechslin, K. Ury¯u, G. Poghosyan, and F. K. Thielemann, “The influence of quark matter at highdensities on binary neutron star mergers,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. (2004) 1469–1480.[65] F. Limousin, D. Gondek-Rosinska, and E. Gourgoulhon, “Last orbits of binary strange quark stars,”
Phys. Rev. D (2005) 064012, gr-qc/0411127 .[66] L.-M. Lin, K. S. Cheng, M. C. Chu, and W.-M. Suen, “Gravitational waves from phase-transitioninduced collapse of neutron stars,” Astrophys. J. (2006) 382, astro-ph/0509447 .[67] N. Yasutake, K. Kotake, M.-a. Hashimoto, and S. Yamada, “Effects of QCD phase transition ongravitational radiation from two-dimensional collapse and bounce of massive stars,”
Phys. Rev. D (2007) 084012, astro-ph/0702476 .[68] G. Sigl, “Cosmological gravitational wave background from phase transitions in neutron stars,” JCAP (2006) 002, astro-ph/0602345 ..