Language
Country/Area
No result found
Basic Structure Doctrine: Why is it considered the patron saint of the Indian Constitution?
In Indian law, the fundamental structural doctrine is considered a pillar of the Constitution, giving the Supreme Court considerable powers to test and strike down any amendment that may jeopardize the Constitution. This doctrine was formally confirmed by the Supreme Court of India in the 1973 case Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, creating a new paradigm for constitutional amendments.
What is the basic structural doctrine?
The doctrine of basic structure asserts that certain qualities of the Constitution cannot be changed by its legislative bodies.
The core of this doctrine is that although Congress has the power to amend the Constitution, this power is not unlimited and certain "basic features" are eternal and cannot be abridged or changed. These characteristics include the fundamental rights of citizens, the operation of the rule of law, and the sovereignty and integrity of the state.
Historical background of the basic structure doctrine
Initially, the Supreme Court's position on constitutional amendment was that any part of the constitution could be amended. However, the 1967 case Golaknath v. State of Punjab overturned this view and decided that fundamental rights were beyond the amending authority of Parliament.
In the Kesavananda Bharati case, Justice Hans Raj Khanna emphasized that the basic structure of the Constitution cannot be changed by Parliament. This decision formed the basis of many important subsequent judgments.
Definition of basic characteristics
Basic features include the supremacy of the constitution, the secular character of the state, and the principle of separation of powers that must be maintained.
Although the law does not explicitly list these essential characteristics, the Supreme Court has recognized a range of characteristics in various cases, including:
- The supremacy of the Constitution
- Rule of law
- Principle of separation of powers
- Atheism and Secularism
- Citizen’s freedom and dignity
The limits of constitutional revision
The establishment of basic structural doctrine is not only a theoretical challenge, but also a checking tool for practical legal operations. Through this doctrine, the Supreme Court can test constitutional amendments passed by Congress to ensure that they do not infringe upon established fundamental characteristics.
Key case analysis
In many key cases, such as Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain and Minerva Mills v. Union of India, the Supreme Court has applied the fundamental structure doctrine to overturn constitutional amendments that were intended to curtail democracy and fundamental rights.
In these cases, the courts have shown that even though Congress has broad amending powers, it cannot change or impair the fundamental structure of the Constitution.
International awareness and challenges
The doctrine of basic structure is not only applicable in India, but also affects the constitutional theory of other countries such as Bangladesh and Malaysia. However, this doctrine has been rejected by the High Court in some jurisdictions such as Singapore.
Impact on contemporary society
The implementation of the Basic Structure Doctrine has had a profound impact on India's political environment and social action. This teaching plays an important role not only in the legal field, but also in the awakening and protection of citizen consciousness. It protects the basic rights of citizens from arbitrary infringement by the law, and at the same time provides an effective check and balance mechanism for power.
Conclusion
In the process of safeguarding the Indian Constitution, the basic structure doctrine has become an important line of defense for defending democracy, the rule of law and basic rights. It limits the power of Congress and prevents possible abuses. But in the future, whether this teaching can still effectively adapt to the changing social and political environment is still a question worthy of our consideration?
