In the field of quantum mechanics, delayed-choice quantum erasure experiments challenge our basic understanding of time, causality, and the role of the observer. This experiment was first proposed by Kim Woo-ho and others in 1998, and explored the strange characteristics of photon behavior in the double-slit experiment, which triggered a lasting mystery: Is the nature of photons a wave or a particle?
In the basic double-slit experiment, the laser beam shines on two parallel slits. When the detection screen is placed on the other side of the slit, what is observed is the interference pattern of light, showing that each photon seems to pass through two parallel slits at the same time. A slit, which is obviously contrary to the concept of separate objects in our daily experience.
"In this quantum world, the act of observation cannot simultaneously treat photons as particles and waves."
When a photon is detected through the slit, any observation of its path destroys the interference pattern. This reveals the principle of complementarity, which states that photons can exhibit the behavior of particles or waves, but cannot be observed both ways at the same time.
The essence of the delayed-select quantum erasure experiment is that even if the photon has been detected, the process of determining whether the "path" information can be obtained can be delayed. This has led scientists to question: Do past events influence future outcomes, or can future observations change past events?
"Such results challenge our fundamental understanding of causal relationships."
In Jin Youhao's experiment, a pair of entangled photons was generated using the annoying double slit and spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC). When a signal photon (primary photon) passes through the double slit, it can be detected and recorded together with a pair of entangled "idle photons".
Detection of the signal photon will determine whether the interference pattern can be observed. If observations with idle photons reveal path information, a simple diffraction pattern is observed without inclusion interference. If you choose not to acquire path information, a clear interference pattern will be observed.
"The choice to observe photons can be made after the event has occurred, and this is what is surprising."
Through this series of experiments, we can see the gap between the behavior of quantum mechanics and our intuitive cognition. Although future choices may seem to influence past behavior, the experiment is really just testing the intrinsic properties of a quantum system—that is, the system exists in "hyperpositions" until it is observed.
The delayed-selection quantum erasure experiment not only provides a new perspective on physics, but also triggers a profound discussion of "causality." Future research may continue to uncover the deeper meaning of quantum phenomena, as well as explore the nature of time, the existence of free will, and the role of the observer in the universe.
All this leads us to think: deep in the quantum world, does causality really exist, or is it just a phantom of human reason?