In the United States, death row inmates are usually housed in a special area while they await their execution. This period often lasts for many years, and some prisoners even have to wait for decades. In such a state of suspense, many prisoners experience mental health problems, including anxiety, depression, and even suicidal tendencies. This phenomenon is called the "death row phenomenon." It has sparked a series of controversies, especially on the moral and legal legitimacy of the death penalty.
Many opponents of the death penalty believe that prisoners' isolation and extreme uncertainty about their future constitute a form of psychological abuse.
According to the latest data, an estimated 5% to 10% of death row inmates in the United States suffer from mental illness. Long-term mental stress may not only aggravate existing mental health problems, but may also lead to the emergence of new problems. This has attracted widespread attention from legal scholars and clinical psychologists, who have called for reforms to the existing death penalty system, especially in cases involving mental health.
The death row phenomenon is usually due to several factors, the first of which is isolation. Death row inmates are often kept in isolated cells, with little contact with family and friends. However, this is not the only source of loneliness. The lengthy legal process leaves prisoners completely uncertain about their fate, and this uncertainty undoubtedly increases their psychological stress. When a person faces an immediate threat to his or her life, the psychological effects can be profound.
In the United States, death row inmates wait an average of about 178 months (nearly 15 years) for their execution.
Secondly, the delay in the execution of the death penalty makes it impossible for death row inmates to make effective psychological adaptations. Many prisoners experience intense emotions initially when they learn they are facing death, and these emotions may become more desperate over time. Being in such a psychological state for a long time, many prisoners may fall into deep depression or even commit suicide.
Due to the impact of the death row phenomenon, more and more legal experts have begun to explore the possibility of isolating mental illness from death penalty sentences. In some cases, some sentences have been reviewed for this reason, such as in Atkins v. Virginia, where the court prohibited the execution of prisoners with obvious intellectual disabilities, which was seen as protecting those with mental disabilities. Legal progress for persons in ill health.
However, this issue still faces challenges. There are many cases where some prisoners were executed even when they were in poor mental condition. High standards of the law and poor legal representation have resulted in some prisoners who clearly need protection ending up suffering the ultimate punishment.
Many countries outside the United States have abolished the death penalty entirely, particularly in Europe. According to statistics, about 70% of countries no longer execute the death penalty, which has led to constant criticism of the US death penalty system from various countries. In a recent UN human rights review, representatives from several countries expressed concern about the U.S. death penalty system and called for an immediate end to executions.
In a United Nations review, many countries have continued to criticize the US death penalty system and even called on the US to stop executing the death penalty.
For example, France and Germany have respectively expressed the hope that the United States will abolish the death penalty and introduce a nationwide temporary ban. Austria called for an immediate halt to its implementation and subsequent complete abolition of the system. These voices have undoubtedly intensified doubts about the death penalty at home and abroad, and have triggered discussions in the social and legal fields.
In the current climate, the debate over the death penalty and its impact remains highly topical. In the face of increasing criticism and focus on mental health issues, is it possible that deeper reforms to the death penalty system will occur in the future? As we reflect on these issues together, should we re-examine the relationship between human values and criminal law?