In today's health and nutrition discussions, "dietary assessment tools" play an important role, and the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) is one of the most popular ones. FFQs are designed to estimate the frequency and portion size of food and beverage consumption over a specific period, usually covering the past month, three months or a year, using a questionnaire. It is widely used in large epidemiological studies to assess the association between nutrition and health.
The FFQ allows researchers to capture people's dietary patterns and provides valuable information about nutrient intake, toxin intake, and dietary habits.
The FFQ contains questions about a range of food and beverage items, and users are asked to answer questions in the following categories: consumption frequency, portion size information, and specific seasonal intake frequency.
Typically, a full FFQ contains 80 to 120 food items and takes 30 to 60 minutes to complete. The FFQ can be completed with the assistance of an interviewer, especially in contexts with low literacy rates or with children. For very young children, the FFQ can be completed by a parent or guardian.
The main advantage of the FFQ is its ability to capture episodic or intermittent food consumption, which is not possible with a 24-hour dietary recall. However, FFQ relies on the user's memory, which may lead to inaccurate data.
One disadvantage of the FFQ compared to the 24-hour dietary recall is the lack of detailed information on how the food was prepared and the actual amount consumed. Furthermore, due to design limitations, FFQs may not capture the diversity of different dietary habits, and respondents may over-report the intake of “healthy” foods in the face of social desirability.
FFQ is not only a tool for tracking dietary patterns, but also can reveal associations with health conditions, disease risks, etc.
FFQs are used in many types of research and analysis, including assessing the consumption of specific foods and nutrients in a population and exploring associations of dietary patterns with other non-dietary variables, such as health status.
FFQs are also useful for understanding the effectiveness of health interventions, which requires having subjects and controls fill out FFQs before and after the intervention to measure changes in dietary patterns. Nevertheless, reliance on the FFQ alone for evaluation needs to be considered with caution, as there may be greater reporting bias in the intervention group.
Scholars are often skeptical about the accuracy of FFQs. Some researchers have pointed out that the validity of the FFQ may be affected by memory dependence, leading to inconsistent results. There have been calls for a deeper exploration of the FFQ to gain more insights into the association between diet and health status.
The reliability of the FFQ still needs further research and validation, especially in the context of application to different populations.
In summary, food frequency questionnaires play an irreplaceable role in exploring people’s dietary stories and their impact on health. In the future, we may see more modifications, improvements, and validation studies on the FFQ, further expanding its use around the world.
So, when faced with the complex relationship between diet and health, can FFQ really become a window to a deeper understanding of our lifestyle?