In the metal additive manufacturing industry, selective laser melting (SLM) and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) are two of the most important technologies. Their basic concept is based on the use of metal powder and high-intensity lasers to produce high-density metal parts. However, there are some key differences between the two in theory and practice, which has attracted great attention in the industry.
Selective laser melting (SLM) originated in 1995, when the technology was developed by a research team at the Feinhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology in Germany. Although the word "melting" is in the name, this process actually penetrates deep into the metal powder to completely melt it and form a solid metal block. In contrast, direct metal laser sintering also uses lasers to process metal powders, but the process is different.
In contrast, when processing metal materials, DMLS and SLM must not only consider the laser power and scanning speed, but also adjust and optimize the powder properties such as roundness and fluidity. This can significantly affect the performance of the metal component and the quality of the final product.
In terms of materials, SLM can be widely used in a variety of materials including stainless steel, nickel-based superalloys, aluminum alloys and titanium alloys, while DMLS has a relatively narrow range, mainly focusing on certain specific metal materials. This makes SLM excellent in applications such as aviation and medical that require highly complex geometries.
The exact differences between selective laser melting and direct metal laser sintering affect their effectiveness in practical applications, especially in the density and performance of the materials themselves.
Overcoming these issues requires in-depth materials research and process optimization, especially in the selection and handling of metal powders.
Looking into the future, the development direction of SLM and DMLS will probably focus on two aspects. On the one hand, it is necessary to optimize process parameters according to different material properties; on the other hand, as additive manufacturing technology gradually matures, its application scenarios will be further expanded, especially in fields such as aerospace and biomedicine.
In a changing market environment, companies must constantly adjust and adapt to this technology to ensure they maintain their advantage in the fierce competition. Will technological advances eventually enable full-density metal components that can meet all needs?