Procedural law, also known as adjective law, is responsible for establishing legal procedures, according to which all relevant laws are heard and organized. In all types of legal proceedings (including civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings), the purpose of procedural law is to ensure fairness and consistency in all cases and to ensure due process or fundamental justice. This means that whenever possible, courts must rely on this process to properly resolve legal disputes.
The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that all legal procedures are conducted in accordance with the principle of fairness, which is an important cornerstone of legal legitimacy.
The difference between substantive law and procedural law is that the former deals with the actual rights and duties of the law, while the latter deals with the legal procedures that provide for those rights and duties. Specific procedural rights, such as the right to know, the right to seek help, the right to confront, etc., are part of the basic rights of citizens and occupy an important position in procedural law.
These procedural rights are reflected in particular in environmental law, for example in the 1998 Aarhus Convention, which emphasizes the importance of the right of citizens to be informed and to participate in environmental issues. This shows the inseparable connection between procedural law and civil rights.
Legal procedures are designed to achieve due process, which is essential in all legal proceedings. Absent extraordinary circumstances, a court cannot impose penalties on an individual who has not received notice of a charge or been given a fair opportunity to present evidence. This principle is intended to ensure that each party has an equal opportunity to defend himself.
The standardization of legal procedures is intended to ensure the fairness of legal procedures to the greatest extent possible. However, these strict procedural rules also bring some challenges.
For example, strict time limits may speed up or delay legal proceedings, and parties who are unfamiliar with procedural law may miss opportunities to defend themselves because they are unable to follow these rules. This highlights the complexity of procedural law and the need for legal professionals.
The origins of procedural law can be traced back to ancient Rome, when the legal procedures had a profound impact on the subsequent European legal system. The procedural law of ancient Rome mainly relied on specific legal acts (actio), which combined procedural and substantive elements, making the boundary between procedural law and substantive law unclear.
In ancient Rome, the relationship between procedural prerequisites and substantive rights was complex.
With the evolution of law, especially with the codification of the German Civil Code in the 19th century, the distinction between procedural law and substantive law began to take shape. This separation influenced subsequent legal thinking, prompting legal scholars and lawyers to re-examine how the law is best applied.
After entering the 21st century, with the development of science and technology, legal procedures have also faced new challenges. The submission of electronic evidence and the digitization of procedures require further adjustments to the legal system to adapt to new ways of operation. How to balance legal justice and efficiency has become an urgent problem to be solved by modern courts.
As the times change, procedural law still occupies an important position in the legal system and affects the legal rights of each of us.
Whether you are a legal professional or a private citizen, it is critical to understand the evolution of procedural law and how it affects your rights. Since procedural law is a tool to maintain legal justice, what actions are you prepared to take to protect your rights when faced with injustice?