Language
Country/Area
No result found
From British rule to Israeli independence: Why was the armed struggle behind the scenes so fierce?
In mid-20th century Palestine, the Jewish community under British rule faced unprecedented tensions during a period marked by fierce armed struggle and the Jewish people's relentless pursuit of autonomy and independence. This fierce armed struggle, led by Jewish underground organizations such as the Irgun, Haganah and Lehi, reflected the growing discontent and confrontation.
Since the publication of the White Paper in 1939, Jewish responses to Britain's restrictive immigration policies have tended towards armed resistance.
With the end of World War II, this struggle did not ease, but instead intensified. In 1944, Irgun declared rebellion against British rule, and Richey had already launched a series of attacks. The actions of these two organizations were not only aimed at the British police and government agencies, but were also a direct response to Jewish immigration policies. In this context, the survival and development of the Jewish nation faced tremendous challenges.
In 1945, as dissatisfaction with British policies reached a peak, the Jewish resistance movement became more radical. The immigration restrictions adopted by the British government forced many persecuted Jews to seek illegal ways to enter Palestine in order to escape Nazi persecution.
During this period of history, the conflict between the British army and the Jewish underground became a catalyst for accelerating Israel's independence.
Background: Conflicts between the World Wars
After the end of World War I, Palestine became a British mandate, making conflicts between Jews and Arabs inevitable. Faced with the growing number of Jewish immigrants, the British government adopted a number of restrictive measures in management. Although the Balfour Declaration of 1917 had expressed support for the establishment of a national home for the Jews, its actual implementation was full of contradictions.
With the outbreak of the Arab Revolt in 1936, tensions in Jewish society became increasingly evident. At this time, the Peel Commission appointed by the United Kingdom had proposed a partition plan, but it was strongly opposed by the Jews and Arabs, and both sides were full of uncertainty about the future direction.
The Jewish desire for freedom and the Arabs' claim to land have become the root causes of conflict in Palestine.
Intensification of armed struggle
Following the end of World War II, tensions between the Jewish community and the United Kingdom continued to rise as the British government imposed immigration restrictions. After the United Nations passed the partition resolution in 1947, the internal conflict in Palestine reached its peak, and the confrontation between the Arab and Jewish communities became increasingly intense.
Not only that, but internal Jewish organizations also formed a link game due to different political lines, especially the tense confrontation between Haganah and Irgun, which made people worry whether such a split would affect the final outcome. Independence causes harm.
In fact, both Jews and Arabs are seeking their respective futures, but the road ahead is full of uncertainty and violence.
Turning point in history: Britain's withdrawal and the birth of Israel
On May 14, 1948, Britain ended its long-standing mandate and Israel was established. This was a historic moment and the result of a long armed struggle. This land witnessed countless conflicts and bloodshed, which eventually led to Israel becoming an independent and sovereign state.
However, the price of independence was heavy, with many civilian and military lives lost. Even so, the Jewish nation's dream of independence was realized. The armed struggle behind this was not only a fight against external oppression, but also a resolution to internal contradictions.
From British rule to Israeli independence, this history reflects the intertwined contradictions between autonomy and oppression.
Conclusion
From this history, we can see how armed struggle was shaped by the tension between ideals and survival. Faced with such a complex situation, should we rethink how to balance the roles of force and politics in the pursuit of peace?
