Language
Country/Area
No result found
From Pain to Comfort: Why VATS Lobectomy Helps Patients Recover Faster.
When faced with a diagnosis of lung cancer, surgical treatment often becomes an important option for patients to prolong their lives. Traditional thoracotomy is undoubtedly the standard procedure for lobectomy, but the postoperative pain and recovery time it brings make many patients feel miserable. With the advancement of technology, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has gradually come to the fore, attracting more and more lung cancer patients to choose this method for lobectomy. Why can VATS surgery help patients recover from pain faster?
Challenges of Traditional Surgery
Traditional lobectomy is usually performed through a thoracotomy incision on the side of the back. This surgical approach requires cutting through many muscles of the chest wall and may cause rib fractures, resulting in severe postoperative pain. These injuries will undoubtedly prolong the patient's hospital stay and affect their recovery speed.
"Open-heart surgery is one of the most painful surgeries, and many patients endure prolonged pain as they recover from the surgery."
After surgery, patients usually need to rely on epidural anesthesia or a patient-controlled analgesia pump to relieve pain, and it takes 7 to 10 days after surgery to control the pain before they can go home safely. Postoperative wound pain may also cause difficulty breathing and increase the risk of lung complications such as atelectasis or pneumonia, so patients need to continue deep breathing and coughing training at home.
Advantages of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
Compared with traditional open chest surgery, the emergence of VATS surgery provides patients with a less invasive option. Since there is no need to extensively separate the chest wall muscles or expand the ribs, patients experience significantly improved pain and recovery time after surgery.
“VATS surgery is performed through a small incision, which not only reduces the damage to the muscles during the operation, but also reduces the pain after the operation.”
In VATS surgery, doctors use a thoracoscope to perform the surgery, which allows many subtle surgical operations to be performed under visualization. In addition, because the small wound is less invasive, the patient's hospital stay is typically reduced to 3 to 5 days, which is nearly half the time of traditional surgery.
Increase in recovery speed
The study found that after VATS surgery, patients' lung function recovered faster and their risk of related complications during hospitalization was significantly reduced. This is directly related to the fact that VATS surgery can preserve more normal lung tissue, reduce pain, and allow patients to resume their daily activities and work ability faster after surgery.
"Through VATS surgery, patients' lung function recovers faster and faster after surgery, and they are more able to participate in subsequent chemotherapy smoothly."
In addition, for elderly patients, the acceptance and recovery ability of VATS surgery are better than traditional thoracotomy, which means that VATS may become the best choice for some elderly lung cancer patients.
Economic considerations
From the perspective of medical economics, VATS surgery not only saves postoperative hospital stay, but also reduces the need for intensive care, thereby reducing overall treatment costs. This is undoubtedly an advantage worthy of attention for patients who require long-term follow-up and chemotherapy.
Applicable people and safety
Not all patients are suitable candidates for VATS surgery. For some patients with larger tumors or tumors in special locations, traditional thoracotomy may still be a necessary option. However, with the improvement of breast surgery algorithms, VATS surgery is becoming more feasible for patients who have received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy in some cases, and the length of hospital stay and the use of chest tubes have been significantly shortened.
ConclusionVATS lobectomy not only breaks through the technical limitations of traditional surgery, but also brings significant improvements in patients' postoperative pain, recovery time and quality of life. For many lung cancer patients, this relatively comfortable surgical option undoubtedly opens a window of hope for them.
In this era of continuous technological advancement, what innovations will be available in the future to further improve the surgical experience for patients?
