For many, World War II was a historical nightmare. However, for the German philosopher Jürgen Habermas, this experience not only shaped his personal life, but also profoundly shaped his thought and philosophical system. Habermas, who was born in 1929, grew up in an era full of war and trouble. He had a profound reflection on human rationality, social morality and the rationality of communication. As his theory gradually formed, many important concepts also followed, especially the ideas of "public sphere" and "communicative rationality". These are not only reflections of Habermas's personal wisdom, but also his views on post-war society. and profound insights into culture.
Habermas's philosophy believes that rational communication can not only promote understanding between individuals, but also promote the progress and change of human society.
Habermas's childhood was influenced by his father's experience during the Nazi period. Faced with the complexity of his parents and social environment, he developed a profound psychological understanding of the importance of authority and communication. Habermas's growth in Germany gave him a different perspective on social rationality and morality. During the reconstruction process of Germany after the war, he deeply felt the preciousness of democracy and freedom. Therefore, through philosophical thinking, he hopes to establish a political society based on rational dialogue and social consensus.
In "The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere", Habermas discusses the rise of the public sphere throughout Europe in the 18th century from an erudite historical perspective, arguing that the dialogic character of society was driven by the development of capitalism. This book points out that with the rise of newspapers, journals, and reading clubs, social dialogue has gradually shifted from "expressive culture" to a more critical "public sphere" culture. This theory not only made him famous in German academic circles, but also deeply influenced historians' research on the French Revolution.
Habermas's view emphasizes that the decline of the public sphere is related to the growth of commercial mass media and the welfare state, factors that make society interact based on interests rather than consensus.
Habermas proposed the concept of "communicative rationality", emphasizing that rationality originates from verbal communication between people, not the structure of the universe. Compared with the traditional view of rationality, this theoretical framework attempts to promote a higher level of social consensus through dialogue, which is particularly important for the development of contemporary society. Habermas's theory attempts to correct the break between the "lifeworld" and the social system caused by the dominance of strategic and instrumental rationality in modern society. Through this theory, Habermas sketched a hopeful picture of the future, believing that returning to a society centered on rational dialogue may be the key to achieving democracy and fairness.
In his Modernity and Postmodernity, Habermas challenged postmodernism. He acknowledged the failures of the 20th century, but he was not willing to give up on a bright future or the possibilities of reason. This stance gave his ideas a place in contemporary philosophy and made him a powerful voice against excessive pessimism. From this perspective, Habermas provides an in-depth analysis of the future of society and proposes ideas that can revitalize the public sphere and democratic institutions.
Although Habermas retired in 1993, he continued to publish works, demonstrating his deep concern for contemporary issues. His thoughts have far-reaching influence, highlighting the importance of rationality, social justice and communication in contemporary society. Habermas's work remains active in academia and continues to provide insights into the philosophy of democracy, the public sphere, and communication.
Through Habermas's ideas, we can reflect on the importance of rationality and communication, and whether the decline of these values in our current society represents the greatest challenge we face.
Thinkers like Habermas not only learn from the past, but also lead future ideological innovations. His experience tells us how to rebuild social trust and understanding through rational dialogue when facing difficulties and challenges. It is undeniable that his philosophical achievements are still triggering extensive discussions and thinking in today's society. Can this thinking lead us to a more rational and humane future?