As genetic testing technology advances, the medical community is turning to a "genes-first" approach to study the genetic makeup of disease, especially complex disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The key to this strategy is to first collect individual genotype information and then classify the clinical phenotype to provide more accurate diagnosis and treatment recommendations. This new research concept is reshaping our understanding of autism and related disorders.
The "gene-first" way of thinking began to take shape in early cytogenetics research. In the 1960s, the discovery of trisomy 21 revealed the link between genes and phenotype. Since then, with the advancement of technology, scientists have used chromosome banding and in situ hybridization techniques to identify the phenotype of patients with chromosomal abnormalities. For complex diseases, this approach overcomes the challenges faced by previous "phenotype-first" approaches.
The gene-first approach not only avoids errors caused by phenotypic differences, but also reveals genes that have a significant impact on the etiology of the disease.
Generally speaking, the "gene-first" approach includes the following steps:
Genotyping generally uses next-generation sequencing technology (including whole genome sequencing and exome sequencing) and microarray analysis. These methods allow researchers to identify the pathogenicity of specific variants and conduct subsequent validation studies.
Gene-first approaches have been successfully applied to diagnose rare diseases and identify novel disease genotype-phenotype associations. For example, in 2014, researchers used a gene-first approach to analyze rare variants in the Finnish population. Due to the genetic characteristics of the Finnish population, this approach showed high efficiency and revealed multiple new genotype-phenotype associations.
In the study of autism spectrum disorder, a "genes-first" approach allows researchers to perform genetic typing to better understand differences between different patients and potentially define specific subtypes of autism.
The main advantage of this approach is that it can be focused on common genetic variants rather than specific clinical presentations, thus helping to identify new syndromes. Moreover, as the cost of sequencing decreases, this method is becoming more and more widely used.
However, the "genes-first" research approach is not flawless. This poses a certain diagnostic challenge as disease phenotypes may change over time. Furthermore, some minor genetic variations may appear diagnostically insignificant.
With the rapid development of genetic technology, gene-first strategies will become more mature and may play a greater role in clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies. Particularly in the study of autism spectrum disorders, this approach is providing revolutionary insights that may lead us toward an era of more personalized medicine.
As our understanding of the link between genes and disease grows in the future, how do you see this changing for people with autism spectrum disorder?