As a tool for assessing the cognitive abilities of job applicants, the Wonderlic test has received widespread attention since it was created by Eldon F. Wonderlic in 1939. The test consists of 50 multiple-choice questions and has 12 minutes to complete, with an average score of 20. Over time, the Wonderlic test has expanded to include the U.S. Department of Defense and the National Football League (NFL). But can scores on this test really predict the success of an NFL player?
"Scores on the Wonderlic test are most strongly correlated with overall intellectual functioning."
The original Wonderlic test was developed in the 1940s to help companies select suitable employees. Over time, Tom Landry, coach of the Dallas Cowboys, first used the test to predict player performance. In the 2000s, the Wonderlic test became an important tool for the NFL to test players' cognitive abilities, and every prospective player would take the test before the NFL draft.
The Wonderlic test is now available in two forms: the Wonderlic Personnel Test Quicktest and the standard version, which contain 30 questions and 50 questions respectively. These tests are not only used to select and train employees, but are also widely used to evaluate job applicants. For NFL players, test scores are used as an indicator of draft and career prospects, which has sparked much controversy.
"Many studies have shown that there is no significant correlation between Wonderlic test scores and actual NFL player performance."
Based on historical data, NFL players at different positions have different average scores on the Wonderlic test. For example, quarterbacks and offensive line players typically receive higher grades. However, this does not necessarily mean that high scores lead to success. Many studies have shown that players with lower grades perform better during their NFL careers, especially for tight ends and defensive backs, while players with higher grades perform less well than expected.
Wonderlic scores and NFL successAccording to multiple studies, the Wonderlic score has no significant effect on predicting quarterback success, and one paper even suggests that for certain positions, lower scores can sometimes predict better performance. The findings have led many to question whether the NFL should continue to rely on the test to screen players.
"High scores can become a burden for NFL players because coaches may worry that players will challenge authority."
Wonderlic testing has been the subject of legal disputes over its application. For example, the Jordan v. New London case, in which an applicant with excessively high scores was excluded from a police position, has generated widespread commentary. This situation raises questions about the fairness and applicability of the test.
SummaryOverall, the usefulness of the Wonderlic test in the NFL is questionable by many experts. Although the original intention was to assess players' intelligence and problem-solving abilities, studies have shown that the scores have a low correlation with actual performance. Does this mean that the NFL should reconsider the need to use the Wonderlic test in player selection?