The safety of nuclear energy has always been a topic of widespread concern, and its consequences on humans and the environment cannot be underestimated. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), nuclear safety can be considered as “the achievement of appropriate operating conditions to prevent accidents and mitigate their consequences in order to protect workers, the public and the environment from excessive radiation hazards.” However, despite the fact that human Great progress has been made in nuclear energy technology, but potential risks associated with it still exist.
"Perfect security cannot be guaranteed, and possible sources of problems include human error and external events."
For example, the disaster at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan in 2011 occurred when designers failed to foresee that a tsunami would render backup systems inoperable, leading to the disaster. In addition to natural disasters, terrorist attacks, war, internal sabotage and cyber attacks may also become security threats to nuclear power plants.
As of 2011, nuclear safety considerations have been undertaken in a variety of scenarios, including the use of nuclear fission energy, nuclear weapons, and the extraction and storage of radioactive materials. All of these processes require prevention of accidental entry of radioactive materials into the biosphere and food chain. Whether it is the operation of nuclear power plants or the use of nuclear materials, safety issues cannot be ignored. This not only concerns human life, but also involves widespread environmental impact.
“The scope of nuclear safety includes at least the extraction, transportation, storage and disposal of nuclear materials and the safety of nuclear power plants.”
Internationally, the IAEA is charged with promoting the safety, protection and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. The IAEA's 1994 Convention on Nuclear Safety is considered an important effort to overcome the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl accidents. But the agency's authority faces many challenges. In response, many scientists and scholars have called for deeper reforms of the IAEA to strengthen supervision of nuclear power plants around the world.
A nuclear power plant is an extremely complex and high-tech system, and the complexity of any system means that failures cannot be completely avoided. There are thousands of risks hidden in its design, construction and daily operation. The Three Mile Island accident is an example of the consequences of multiple failures in a complex system.
Once the huge amount of radioactive material in a nuclear power plant leaks, it may cause immediate radiation risks, followed by land and vegetation contamination, and even long-term health problems. Although nuclear power plants will not explode like nuclear bombs, operating nuclear reactors may suffer a nuclear meltdown accident due to failure of the cooling system. This not only depends on technology, but is also closely related to the security of management and personnel operations.
As the international situation becomes increasingly tense, nuclear power plants have become priority targets in armed conflicts. Historically, several military operations have directly targeted nuclear facilities, forcing people to reconsider the safety of nuclear power. Preventing attacks on nuclear facilities remains an important issue in current nuclear energy safety regulation.
"Nuclear power plants must be able to respond to potential attacks, whether from ground or air threats."
Considering the potential risks of nuclear energy and the increasingly severe safety challenges, countries are striving to find a balance between nuclear energy development and safety regulation. In such a complex context, we can't help but ask: Can the future development of nuclear energy achieve a perfect balance between safety and technological progress?