When we walk into a building in our daily lives, have we ever thought about whether the design of this building can ensure our safety in various situations? In engineering, Factor of Safety (FoS) is used to indicate the degree of redundancy of a system for its target load. Calculation of safety factors often relies on detailed analysis because comprehensive testing is often impractical in many projects, such as bridges and buildings. Nevertheless, the ability of a structure to carry loads must be determined with reasonable accuracy.
Many systems are intentionally designed to be stronger than necessary under normal use in order to be able to cope with emergency situations, unexpected loads, misuse, or degradation.
There are two definitions of safety factor: the first is the ratio of the absolute strength of the structure to the actual load, which is a measure of the reliability of a particular design; the second is a constant value required by law, standard or specification that the structure must meet or exceed. The former is often referred to as the achieved safety factor, and the latter as the design safety factor.
The calculation of the factor of safety usually involves a variety of methods, all of which have the fundamental goal of assessing the degree to which a structure can withstand additional loads. These methods differ computationally, but all provide a standardized way to compare the strength and reliability of systems.
The main difference between safety factor and design factor is:
For a particular application, design factors are usually predetermined by law or industry standards.
For example, buildings often use a factor of safety of 2.0, which means that the structure should be able to carry twice the design load. This relatively low value is due to the relative predictability of the loads and the redundancy of most structures. For industries such as aerospace, higher safety factors may be required to deal with potential risks.
Margin of Safety (MoS) is also often used to describe the ratio between the strength of a structure and its required standard. This indicator helps designers assess the ability of a component to withstand additional loads during use:
If the marginal safety factor of a component is 0, it means that it will not have any additional load-bearing capacity before the design load is reached; if the marginal safety factor is 1, it means that the total load it can withstand is twice the design load.
Selecting the appropriate design factor requires consideration of multiple factors, including the accuracy of the predicted load, material strength, wear estimation, and the operating environment. For some key components, whose failure may lead to serious consequences, it is usually necessary to set a higher safety factor. In contrast, the requirements for non-critical components can be relatively low.
ConclusionComponents and materials in the aviation industry face stricter quality control and preventive maintenance requirements to ensure their reliability and safety.
As society's demand for safety continues to increase, the design factors in construction projects will affect the safety and quality of our lives. Designers must thoughtfully select appropriate coefficients to balance safety, cost, and future risk. So how do we keep ourselves safe in an increasingly complex engineering world?