Over the past few decades, children's residency rights have gradually become a focus of legal attention. This change reflects the society's increasing awareness of children's rights, especially as many countries have signed the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the best interests of children have received unprecedented attention.
Guardianship is usually divided into legal guardianship and physical guardianship. Legal custody involves the right to make important decisions, while physical custody is about establishing the arrangements for your child's daily life. Traditionally, custody decisions after divorce have relied primarily on the criterion of "who can provide better care," with a general tendency to award custody of the child to the mother.
“In the past, children were viewed as economic assets and parental custody was based primarily on their financial ability.”
With the changes in social concepts, today's legal terminology has gradually replaced the traditional "guardianship and visitation". Rather, e.g. in some countries, a child is described as "living with both parents" or "having contact with one parent". This shift emphasizes the child's residency rights, not just the parent's custody rights. This means that children in a divorced family should have the right to live equally in both families, rather than unilaterally obeying one parent.
Of course, all these changes are based on the principle of "best interests". This principle emphasizes that in any legal decision involving children, their happiness, safety, and overall well-being must be given priority.
“The core of the best interests principle is to ensure the quality of life and mental health of children after family changes.”
However, in practice, the process of judging based on "best interests" often faces many challenges. For example, when there is a strong conflict between the two parents, this actually makes the "best interests" even more unclear. . Multiple studies have shown that children prefer to spend a balanced amount of time with both parents.
Economic factors and gender roles cannot be ignored when discussing children's residency rights. Traditionally, the legal system has tended to favor mothers, which is related to society's view of the natural connection between women and children. However, as times change, the role of fathers in their children's lives has become increasingly important.
"Parents' economic ability will still have a significant impact on the best interests, and society should also give full consideration to the occupational allocation and investment of parents."
There are significant differences in the specific practices of family laws in different countries regarding children's residence rights. For example, in Australia, parents are required to submit detailed custody plans in court, while in India, child custody is deeply influenced by religion and culture. In the United States, as the "best interests" principle has evolved, the influence of parents' gender on child custody has gradually weakened, and more neutral legal standards have begun to be used to determine the best living environment for children.
As society continues to pay attention to children's rights, the laws and policies regarding children's residence rights will continue to evolve. Legal experts suggest that future issues need to continue exploring residence rights solutions suitable for all family structures so that every child can have equal opportunities and environment to grow.
Can we work together in this conversation so that every child’s rights, voice, and opportunity to live together are recognized and respected?