Language
Country/Area
No result found
The evolution of digital citizenship: Why is it so important in a digital society?
In today’s data-based society, the concept of digital citizenship is becoming increasingly important. According to Karen Mossberger's definition, digital citizens refer to "those who use the Internet regularly and effectively" and use information technology to participate in society, politics and government. It’s not just about using technology, but also using it responsibly and ethically to promote a better digital environment.
The core principles of digital citizenship include: digital access, digital etiquette, digital communication, digital literacy, digital law, digital rights and responsibilities, digital health and well-being, and digital security.
These principles remind us that digital citizenship is a responsibility closely related to daily life, covering how to safely and ethically navigate the digital world and create value and support for others in this environment, even in the current "algorithmic society" , the definition of digital identity has also become more profound. In this context, the value of digital citizenship is that it represents the role an individual plays in digital technology, rather than just being a “user.”
Further, the significance of digital citizenship in the "algorithmic society" emphasizes individual privileges and responsibilities. This means that in a data-driven society, individuals must not only understand how to use technology, but also have the ability to challenge, avoid or mediate data numbering. We live in a world full of data, and every behavior may be digitized, which will affect personal decisions and behaviors.
These thoughts show that digital space, as a political space, should protect the basic rights of individuals, including traditional rights and new rights exclusive to the Internet.
The participation of digital citizens in digital society can be divided into two main stages: information transmission and citizen consultation. In the information transmission stage, static and dynamic information transmission methods ensure that citizens can obtain information and participate in discussions on this basis. In the citizen consultation stage, citizens begin to evaluate their role in promoting policy changes, such as expressing opinions and suggestions through voting and public meetings.
Digital citizen participation not only promotes social inclusion but also promotes true democratic governance on digital platforms.
However, digital technology also faces challenges in political participation. The instability of technology and the poor representation of minority groups in digital democracy raise questions about the effectiveness of digital technologies. Facing the "filter bubble effect", Internet users' prejudices may be strengthened, leading society to accept false information, thereby affecting voting and decision-making. These issues must also be considered by the government.
Differences in digital citizenship between developed and developing countries are also evident. Digital citizens in developed countries can directly participate in politics through various digital platforms, while in developing countries, due to low accessibility of technology, the proportion of digital citizens is relatively small. Although recent efforts are reducing the digital divide, many challenges remain, such as insufficient technology infrastructure and a lack of digital skills.
In such an environment, teenagers’ Internet usage habits are a key factor affecting the formation of digital citizenship. Many studies indicate that teenagers spend more time online than watching TV every day. This not only affects their lifestyle, but also changes their understanding of digital citizenship and has a profound impact on future social participation methods.
Digital citizenship is a responsible and respectful attitude towards the use of technology, and is actively practiced and practiced in the digital realm to promote social justice and human rights.
Ultimately, digital citizenship is not just a change of identity, but a rethinking of how everyone lives in a data-based society. Facing the future, how should we define our role in the rapidly changing digital environment to ensure that we find a balance between order and chaos so that every citizen can get the rights and participation opportunities they deserve?
