In today's multipolar world, the Non-Alignment Movement (NAM) is an international organization that is worthy of careful consideration. It was established during the Cold War, primarily to protect the interests of developing countries and to counter the monopoly of two major power blocs - the Soviet Union and the United States. In this context, the establishment and evolution of the non-alignment movement are shrouded in mystery, being not only the result of power confrontation during the Cold War, but also the labor of emerging countries in seeking self-definition.
The origins of the non-alignment movement can be traced back to 1950, when India and Yugoslavia first used the term "non-alignment" at the United Nations. The concept was further developed at the 1955 Wanbao Conference, which brought together several Asian and African countries to discuss how to maintain each other's independence in the context of the Cold War. In 1956, the Non-Alignment Movement was founded as an organization, adopting the Brijuni Declaration, which stressed the need for "mutual respect and cooperation between nations."
"Peace cannot depend solely on separation, but on striving for collective security and expanding freedom and ending the domination of one nation over another."
The non-alignment movement was a wise choice made by some non-Western countries to deal with the international situation during the Cold War. Their common idea was to establish a neutral international policy. According to political scientists, this movement is largely based on the pursuit of sovereignty, security and independence.
Throughout the Cold War, the non-alignment movement faced strong pressure from both the Soviet Union and the United States. Although some member states have close ties to one camp or the other, the non-aligned movement still maintains common positions on some key issues, especially the development of decolonization, disarmament and anti-racism.
“The non-alignment movement is the greatest peace movement in history.”
However, some conflicts between member states cannot be ignored, such as the confrontation between India and Pakistan, and the tension between Iran and Iraq, which have affected the cohesion of the movement to a certain extent. At this time, Cuba strengthened its leadership in the non-aligned movement in the 1970s, and its support for the Soviet Union also aroused doubts from some member states.
With the end of the Cold War in 1991, the nonalignment movement was challenged to redefine itself. In the post-Cold War era, the movement began to focus more on multilateral cooperation and strengthening ties among developing countries. Especially under the trend of globalization, the non-alignment movement emphasizes solidarity and cooperation among developing countries and strives to enhance their voice on the international stage.
“The purpose of the non-alignment movement is to oppose external occupation and intervention.”
This shift reflects the movement’s sensitivity to the contemporary international political landscape and highlights its key role in addressing global issues of poverty, unequal development and social injustice.
While non-aligned movements play an important role in global politics, the challenges they face cannot be underestimated. The diversity and conflicts of interest among member states make it difficult to form a consistent position and take consistent actions. More importantly, in today’s unipolar world, the dominance of Western countries still has a profound impact on non-alignment movements.
In the upcoming 2024 conference, how will the non-aligned movement respond to the new challenges posed by globalization?