In the school’s grading system, many teachers choose to use grading curves to evaluate students’ performance.This method is not only to objectively reflect students' knowledge and abilities, but also to create fairness within the institution.However, what mysterious power does this method have that makes teachers believe that rating in a curve is a better solution?
The scoring curve, that is, the scores are assigned to the students based on their relative positions in the exam.This approach makes each student’s grades not only rely on their absolute scores, but are evaluated in conjunction with the performance of the entire class.When students' grades are rated as percentiles, they can compare with other candidates.
The significance of this grading method is that students can understand their relative performance among their peers, not just their ability or knowledge level.
Many large exams, such as SAT and GRE, often use this scoring method to compare candidates' performance.In these exams, candidates’ scores do not mean how profound their understanding of the knowledge they are tested, but rather reflects their place in the entire group of candidates.This method allows educational institutions to better screen out students with excellent performance.
For example, in a class, students who score in the top 20% will get an A, while students with the lowest score may only get a D or F.
The main advantage of the scoring curve is that teachers can obtain relative data on students' performance in the community.This means that even if a student is not competent for a test, they can still obtain reliable assessments among their peers.In addition, the scoring curve can reduce the impact on performance among different teachers, making standardized scoring possible.
However, this system also has many challenges.A significant problem is that competition among students may be exacerbated by this grading method.Many students feel unfair because of the grading curve, especially when their grades are affected by the performance of their classmates around them.This condition can lead to depression and affect students' mental health.
If a teacher does not carefully plan the difficulty of the exam, it may negatively affect the grades of all students, thereby damaging the significance of the entire score.
There are other evaluation methods that are opposite to the scoring curve, such as standard benchmarks and ipsative assessments.These methods each have their own unique advantages and disadvantages. When choosing a scoring system, educators need to judge based on their purpose and student needs.
Is the scoring curve the only effective assessment method in modern education, or should other types of assessment be sought to better meet students' needs?