In ecology, beta-diversity (or true beta-diversity) refers to the ratio between regional-level and local species diversity. The term was introduced by R. H. Whittaker along with alpha-diversity and gamma-diversity. Whittaker proposed the idea that the total species diversity of a region (γ) is determined by the average species diversity at the local level (α) and the differentiation between local sites (β).
"Species diversity can be regional or local, and the relationship between the two is an important key to understanding ecosystem health and stability."
Rare species play an overly prominent role in differences in species assemblages between sites or communities. This is because the presence or absence of species often reflects combinations of rare species. Additionally, beta-diversity can be used as a measure of nestedness, which occurs when species-poor sites have assemblages that become a subset of species-rich sites.
Although the study of beta-diversity patterns is a central theme in ecology and biogeography, different studies often reach different conclusions. For example, the niche compression hypothesis proposed by some scholars predicts higher β-diversity in low latitudes, however, the results of comparative studies on natural local sites and artificially modified local sites are also different.
"What factors lead to the unique combination of species in these areas?"
For example, Kitching et al. sampled original forests and logged forests in the Dancang Valley (Borneo) and found that the β-diversity in the original forests was higher than that in the logged forests; on the contrary, Berry et al. found that the β-diversity in the logged forests was higher. Better than virgin forest. These results demonstrate significant inconsistency in β-diversity patterns.
Such results highlight that in ecological studies, such as those proposed by Sreekar et al., differences between studies often stem from differences in sampling granularity and spatial extent. Their study showed that spatial scale changes the relationship between beta-diversity and latitude.
Major diversity events in the geological past, such as the Cambrian explosion and the Ordovician biodiversity event, are often related to changes in the relative contributions of α-diversity and β-diversity. This process is called diversity allocation. Empirical data from these case studies confirm theoretical predictions that the ratio of β-diversity relative to α-diversity increases as the number of species increases, primarily due to the effects of interspecies competition, but once geographic mobility increases selection is exhausted, α-diversity may grow again.
Current ecological research has realized that an important role of β-diversity is that it can reveal the changing patterns of species within a region. Through different eco-biome interactions and biodiversity conservation strategies, researchers are working hard to find reasonable explanations for these unique species combinations. Exploring this issue may be an important direction for future ecological research. A deeper understanding of the uniqueness of species combinations in different regions will have a profound impact on ecological conservation and resource management.