In today's digital audio world, lossy audio formats, such as MP3 and AAC, have become the mainstream audio storage and transmission options. These formats effectively compress audio data, allowing users to easily download, stream or store large amounts of music and podcasts without taking up too much space on their device. However, such convenience comes from the compromise of audio quality, causing many people to start thinking: Why choose these lossy formats instead of retaining the original quality of the audio?
The difference between audio encoding formats mainly lies in the way their data is processed. Lossy audio formats not only compress but also reduce the detail of the audio, meaning that some information that is imperceptible to the human ear cannot be recovered. Such algorithms rely on human hearing characteristics, that is, developers decide which data to delete based on psychoacoustic models during encoding to achieve maximum compression.
“In the encoding process of audio content, the data processing performed by the lossy format is often chosen based on our hearing perception.”
Since the 1950s, audio encoding technology has continued to advance. Differential Pulse Code Modulation (DPCM) developed by Bell Labs pioneered the digitization of audio. Over time, many innovations such as adaptive DPCM and its subsequent vocoder technology have led to continuous improvements in the quality and efficiency of audio compression. In the 1980s, the emergence of the Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) algorithm brought the audio compression ratio to an unprecedented level.
Nowadays, audio compression formats such as MP3 and AAC are widely used in major music streaming platforms and digital downloads due to their relatively small file size and good audio quality. Users will hardly notice small changes in sound quality in their daily lives and therefore prefer to use these lossy formats.
"Despite the loss in sound quality, the convenience of being able to easily store thousands of songs undoubtedly makes many people willing to accept the compromise of a lossy format."
With the advancement of technology and people's increasing requirements for sound quality, many users today are beginning to re-evaluate their choice of audio formats. Although lossless audio formats such as FLAC and Apple Lossless are slightly cumbersome in terms of file size, the high-fidelity sound quality they provide makes these formats increasingly valued. In the future, it is worth looking forward to how audio encoding technology will balance the contradiction between sound quality and file size.
Whether it is for storage space or for convenient playback, the convenience and conflicts brought by audio encoding formats are obvious. Especially in an era when digital media has increasingly become a major consumer product, the choice of lossy formats has become a popular norm. However, with the changes in digital popular music, how should we weigh the trade-off between convenience and sound quality?