Abstract Expressionism emerged as a distinct art movement in the United States after World War II and quickly gained mainstream acceptance. The movement evolved out of American Social Realism in the 1930s, when art was heavily influenced by the Great Depression and Mexican muralists. The term "Abstract Expressionism" was first applied to American art by art critic Robert Coates in 1946.
This movement was not limited to painting, but also included influential collage art and sculpture, and many important artists such as Alshiel Goethe, Jackson Pollock and Mark Rothko were important representatives of it.
The painting style of abstract expressionism is not limited to a specific technique and is strongly influenced by surrealism in its creative methods. These artists often emphasize spontaneous and subconscious creation. Artists combined the emotional intensity of German Expressionism with the visual language of the European avant-garde to form this unique movement.
The artwork itself is no longer seen as a simple picture, but is understood as an "event". One of the originators of this concept was Harold Rosenberg, who described the canvas as a "stage for action" where every stroke of the artistic process becomes a struggle for survival. This not only changes the way artists create, but also reshapes the meaning of art itself.
For example, in Pollock’s “action paintings”, every drop of paint that falls contains his momentary emotions, which to some extent reflects the social and personal struggles he faced.
By the 1950s, as the Cold War intensified and society changed, Abstract Expressionism began to be questioned and eventually faced the rise of another wave of art movements, such as Pop Art and Minimalism. Despite this, the influence of Abstract Expressionism continued in the second half of the 20th century, with its artistic concepts blending and changing among different schools.
American art critics in the 1950s, such as Clement Greenberg and Harold Rosenberg, played a key role in the development of the movement. Their critiques not only raised the profile of Abstract Expressionism, but also helped artists find their place on the broader art stage.
Greenberg regarded Pollock and his works as the highest value of art, while Rosenberg emphasized that this art form can convey the full release of individual expression.
Under the guidance of these two critics, artists began to form a closer cooperation and communication mechanism to inspire each other and have a more diverse understanding of creation.
The essence of action painting is not only a technical means, but also a profound reflection on art and expression. In a sense, the canvas is no longer just a carrier of art, but has become a battlefield for artists to realize themselves and display their inner world. As time goes by, many artistic expressions that were considered marginal have gradually been accepted by the public, which has triggered profound dialogue and thinking.
Is contemporary art today still the invisible struggle behind that colorful painting?
Faced with this phenomenon, many artists and critics have conducted in-depth analysis in this regard. What role does action painting play in contemporary art, and whether it can continue to be an important way to explore the individual self and its connection with the world, is worth our deep consideration.