In the fields of materials science and fluid mechanics, the stress tensor is one of the core concepts that describes material behavior. However, when it comes to the representation of stress, the Cauchy stress tensor is undoubtedly the most popular choice among them. Why does this happen, and why do other stress measurement methods still exist and be used? This article will delve into the uniqueness of Cauchy stress and its importance in stress analysis.
Cauchy stress, also known as true stress, is a measure that describes the forces acting on area elements in their deformed configuration. The biggest feature of this stress tensor is that it is extremely sensitive to the deformation process of the material. Specifically, Cauchy stress is defined in the following way:
d f = t d Γ
t = σ^T ⋅ n
Here, t is the traction force acting on the surface, and n is the normal vector of the surface exerting the force. From here we can see that Cauchy stress contains key information about the state of the material in a deformation environment.
In numerical simulations, especially in the context of metal plastic deformation, the Kirchhoff stress tensor is often used. This stress is often called the weighted Cauchy stress tensor, which is defined as:
τ = Jσ
Here, J is the determinant of the deformation gradient. Kirchhoff stress not only has application value, but also can simplify mathematical description to a certain extent, which makes it occupy a place in the field of engineering.
In addition to Cauchy and Kirchhoff stress, Piola–Kirchhoff stress provides another way to describe material stress. This stress tensor is divided into the first and second Piola–Kirchhoff stress, where the first Piola–Kirchhoff stress is defined as:
N^T ⋅ n₀ = d f
While the first Piola–Kirchhoff stress is often referred to as engineering stress, the second Piola–Kirchhoff stress is symmetrical and is particularly useful in analyzing the rebound and elastic behavior of materials.
Biot stress provides new insights into strain gradients in materials science. It is defined as:
T = 1/2 (R^T ⋅ P + P^T ⋅ R)
The existence of this stress tensor means that it is important for understanding the energy required to deform a material over time, although its physical meaning is more abstract.
When discussing these stress tensors, we also need to understand the conversion relationship between them. The relationship between Cauchy stress and nominal stress is:
N^T = J (F^{-1} ⋅ σ)
Such an expression demonstrates the close connection between different stress tensors, which may allow us to flexibly use different types of stress tensors in examples.
The Cauchy stress tensor is widely used not only because of its accuracy, but also because of its profound analytical value in the practice of deformed materials. Although several alternative stress measurement methods exist, Cauchy stress remains the most common and valid manifestation. However, readers cannot help but wonder, in future research, will more innovative stress measurement methods emerge to challenge the status of Cauchy stress?