Globally, clinical audit has gradually gained attention from the medical system as an important tool to improve the quality of patient care. This process is not only an assessment of medical quality, but also a systematic review process aimed at improving patient treatment outcomes by clarifying standards. However, after careful consideration, we can't help but ask: Why is such an audit system still difficult to implement in many places?
“Clinical audit is a quality improvement process that aims to improve patient care and outcomes by systematically reviewing care, comparing it to clear standards, and implementing changes.”
The roots of clinical auditing can be traced back to several important people and events in history. The initial medical review was conducted by Baghdad's chief doctor, Sinan Ibnu Thabit, and the market prosecutor, Abu Batiha al-Muhtasib, because a medical error had led to the patient's death. Following the survey, the first medical licensing examination was introduced, allowing only physicians who passed the examination to practice. According to Ibnu Al-Ukhuwwa in his book Ma'alim al-Qurba: fi Ahkam al-Hisba, ensuring the quality of medical work is a matter of life and death for patients.
As time went on, one of the key historical figures was Florence Nightingale, who conducted her clinical audit work during the Crimean War. When she arrived at the medical barracks in Scutari, faced with poor sanitary conditions and a mortality rate of 40%, the team of nurses she led implemented strict hygiene standards and successfully reduced the mortality rate to 2%. Her documentation and data analysis provide an empirical basis for health care reform.
Despite Nightingale and Codman's success, their work failed to gain popularity for quite some time. It was not until 1989 that the UK's white paper "Working for Patients" formally incorporated clinical audit into the standardization process of professional medicine for the first time. Among them, medical audit is defined as "a systematic critical analysis of the quality of medical care..." This marks a dedicated focus on the quality of medical care. In addition, NHS guidance documents provide a clearer implementation framework for clinical audit.
“Clinical audit is a systematic analysis of the quality of health care, including the use of diagnostic, therapeutic and care processes, as well as resource utilization and patient quality of life outcomes.”
The clinical audit process can be described as a cycle with five stages: problem identification, standard definition, data collection, performance comparison and change implementation. This cycle is not only a continuous improvement in quality, but also a reflection of the resilience of the medical system itself.
This phase involves selecting the topics for review, usually focusing on assessing compliance with medical procedures. The selection of review topics is influenced by many factors, particularly current national standards and guidelines, patient recommendations, and high-risk or high-cost areas.
Overall goals must be clearly defined, and these standards should be set based on the best available evidence, with clear reference values for indicators of success.
3. Data CollectionThis stage ensures the accuracy and necessity of the collected data and develops a specific plan for data collection, including the user groups involved and their related medical staff.
During the performance analysis process, data results are compared with pre-set standards. If the standards are not met, the reasons are analyzed and the focus of improvement is identified.
5. Implement changesFinally, based on the audit findings and analytical insights, an action plan is established to implement the required changes, followed by follow-up audits to ensure continuous improvement.
Although clinical audits are of great significance in theory, in practice they are often limited by the acceptance of hospitals and medical staff. However, in the UK, clinical audit has gradually been promoted and required as part of medical quality governance. This is not only a guide to improving the quality of patient care, but also a necessary part of self-examination and continuous improvement of the entire health service system.
However, deeper thinking leaves us with a question: In the process of promoting clinical audit, how can we overcome the various resistances and obstacles in the medical system and make it truly play a role?