The Surprising History of the Human Shield: How Gandhi Inspired This Strategy of Resistance

The concept of human shield was first proposed by India's founding father Gandhi as a non-violent means of resisting oppression when facing powerful forces. The use of civilians as a tactic to protect legitimate military objectives in wars, conflicts, and political struggles has a long and controversial history.

Legal Background

Forcing protected persons to act as human shields is considered a war crime under the 1949 Geneva Conventions and their 1977 Additional Protocols. Law professor Eliav Lieblich once pointed out: "Armed groups bear some responsibility for the harm caused to civilians under their control. However, it is incorrect to think that this can exempt the other party from responsibility." Law professor Adil Ahmad Haque refuted He expressed the view of the US Department of Defense that even civilians forced to make this choice still enjoy legal and moral protection.

"Even innocent civilians should be spared unnecessary and excessive harm."

Examples from the 20th Century

World War I

According to Article 23 of the 1907 Hague Convention, a belligerent may not compel citizens of the enemy's nationality to take part in war against its own country. This means that, in war, forcing civilians to perform military actions is prohibited.

Italian invasion of Ethiopia

During the second significant Ethiopian war, Italian forces systematically bombed medical facilities to combat the Ethiopian state. Italy accuses Ethiopia of using hospitals as bases for concealed weapons.

Arab Revolt

During the British Mandate of Palestine, British troops often used captured Arab civilians as human shields to prevent further attacks by rebels.

The post-Cold War world

Gulf War

After Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, Saddam Hussein's government detained hundreds of Western citizens as human shields, intending to intimidate countries involved in the military operation. In a report submitted to the UN Security Council, the US government condemned Iraq for deliberately deploying military weapons in residential areas to protect civilians.

Israel-Palestinian conflict

In many of the conflicts between Israel and Hamas, both sides have been accused of using civilians as human shields. Human rights groups have repeatedly investigated and pointed out that the IDF used Palestinians as shields during operations in an attempt to reduce the consequences of the attacks.

Continuation of the 21st century

In contemporary conflicts, such as the Taliban in Pakistan, the Syrian insurgency and the current conflict in Yemen, there are numerous cases of armed groups and government forces using civilians as human shields, raising ethical and legal questions. Heated discussion.

Gandhi's influence

Gandhi’s strategy of resistance, focused on not responding to violence with violence, inspired countless others who followed. The concept of human shield is not only a strategy in war, but also a support and protection for the vulnerable. How Gandhi's policy of nonviolent resistance, which has historically been proposed, can be reinterpreted in modern conflicts is a question worth pondering.

In this modern society full of complex moral choices, how should we view the use of human shields?

Trending Knowledge

The legal controversy over the human shield: Is it possible to use it legally in war?
The use of humans as shields in war raises widespread legal and moral controversy. The use of human shields is explicitly prohibited under international humanitarian law, in particular the Geneva Conv
nan
Human mastoid virus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection, affecting millions of people around the world.According to statistics, up to 90% of HPV-related genital warts are caused b
Why is it a war crime to force innocent people to become human shields? Uncover the secrets of international law!
In a war, innocent people are forced to serve as human shields, which not only violates morality but also violates international law. According to the 1949 Geneva Convention and subsequent legal provi

Responses