The term ivory tower first appeared in the Song of Songs in the Bible, representing a symbol of purity and sublimity. However, over time, the meaning of the word gradually changed and began to refer to a state of being out of touch with real society. In today's context, ivory tower is often used to describe experts and scholars in academia who live in the heights of knowledge but are indifferent to the practical needs and ridicules of everyday life.
The ivory tower is a state of privileged seclusion, where people choose to disconnect from the world and focus on their own spiritual and philosophical interests.
The so-called "ivory tower" originated from the seventh chapter of the Song of Songs. It was originally used to describe the beauty and purity of women. This symbol was later used to describe the Virgin Mary. In a society where such symbolism is often misunderstood or simplified, the modern ivory tower has reverberated and changed considerably from its original intent.
In 1837, French literary critic Charles Augustin de Saintebove first used the term "ivory tower" to describe a poet in his poem, describing him as a self-enclosed dreamer, in contrast to writers who were more concerned with society. Such a sharp contrast to Hugo. This literary depiction reveals the loneliness behind the pursuit of knowledge represented by the ivory tower, while also reflecting the uneasiness and escape from social reality.
This image is full of mockery of those who devote themselves too much to academics, suggesting that they are unable to establish effective communication with the outside world in their pursuits.
Today, ivory tower is widely used to describe experts and scholars in academia. They are known for their research and academic publications, but they are also criticized for becoming increasingly out of touch with society and lacking the ability to address major social issues. This situation in academia has caused many scholars to immerse themselves in each other's professional terms and knowledge, and often find it difficult to communicate effectively with the general public.
This scenario leads to the following question: Can research in today's academia still impact and improve our society?
Criticisms within the academic community continue to emerge, and many papers mention the various problems brought about by the ivory tower, such as restricting the public accessibility of academic results. Some scholars have called on universities and academic institutions to reduce their reliance on past achievements, return to the real world, and pay more attention to specific needs such as public issues and social welfare.
Critics point out that writers of modern poetry must step out of this "ivory tower" or they will only confine themselves to an elitist creative circle.
In contemporary times, with the development of globalization and the increasing prominence of social problems, the ivory tower is also facing the challenges of transformation and adaptation. Scholars are no longer just researchers; more and more of them are beginning to engage in public affairs to address the various challenges facing society. This is a commendable development as they are no longer limited to their own professional research, but are applying their knowledge to solve real-world problems.
However, can such a transformation truly break down the ivory tower and enable academia to establish closer ties with society? When we reflect on this issue, are we also looking for a new balance so that academic pursuits and social needs can promote each other?
Conclusion: Rethinking the Ivory TowerThe ivory tower used to be a symbol of wisdom and creativity, but modern society requires the academic community to face many practical challenges. In this process, scholars in ivory towers need to constantly reflect on their roles and responsibilities. How can we maintain academic quality while keeping close contact with the general public? This is an important issue that the contemporary academic community must consider.