In intertidal ecosystems, starfish are undoubtedly a keystone species. Although these small creatures may not be eye-catching in appearance, their impact on the ecological balance is quite profound. According to research by ecologist Robert T. Payne, starfish can be considered a "keystone species" whose presence or absence will directly affect the surrounding biological communities.
One of starfish's main foods in the intertidal zone is mussels (Mytilus californianus), a shellfish that often overpopulates and monopolizes space and resources. However, when starfish are present, their predatory behavior keeps the number of mussels within a reasonable range, leaving ample living space and resources for other marine organisms, such as seaweeds, sponges, and sea anemones.
The existence of starfish is like a key stone in an arch. Without it, the balance of the entire ecosystem will collapse.
In the 1960s, Payne conducted a series of experiments on starfish and their effects on intertidal organisms. When he removed starfish from an area, he found that the number of mussels increased dramatically, ultimately reducing the area's biodiversity significantly. The original 15 species that clung to the rocks were reduced over time to just eight species, and eventually the areas were almost entirely occupied by mussels.
Experimental results like this highlight the importance of starfish as a keystone species. In the absence of starfish, unrestricted reproduction of mussels could lead to the extinction of other species, not just the mussels themselves, but also other organisms that depend on diverse habitats. Therefore, the predatory behavior of starfish not only maintains the competitive balance among species, but also ensures the stability of the ecosystem.
Furthermore, starfish impacts are not limited to mussels and other shellfish. When starfish populations are threatened, entire ecosystems change. For example, on the west coast of North America, perennial sea otters are also considered a keystone species because they control populations of sea urchins, which destroy kelp forests. When sea otter numbers decline, sea urchins multiply, eventually leading to the disappearance of kelp forests and severe damage to the entire biological fiber.
A similar example is the gray wolf in Yellowstone National Park. The presence of wolves can control herbivore populations, thereby protecting vegetation and habitats and allowing more species to coexist. Therefore, protecting starfish and these keystone species has become one of the focuses of biodiversity conservation.
In an ecosystem, the existence of certain species is indispensable, and their absence will lead to ecological collapse.
With the impact of climate change and human activities, the living environment of starfish is also facing threats. Pollution, habitat destruction, and overfishing have all contributed to the decline in starfish populations and the consequent collapse of entire intertidal ecosystems. Therefore, protecting the living environment of starfish has become crucial. Ecologists advocate protecting these keystone species through the establishment of marine protected areas, sustainable fishing techniques and reducing pollution.
All in all, starfish play an integral role in intertidal ecosystems. Their presence not only ensures biodiversity but also maintains the balance of the entire ecosystem. By understanding and protecting these keystone species, we can not only protect marine ecosystems but also safeguard ecological resources for future generations. How does the fate of starfish affect other species? Does this test our commitment to ecological protection?