In computational complexity theory, arithmetic circuits are considered a standard model for computing polynomials. The basic principle of this model is that an arithmetic circuit can be operated through nodes, which can be variables or numbers, and allow addition and multiplication calculations. In this framework, we can gain deeper insights into the complexity of computing polynomials. So what is the best way to do this calculation?
The fundamental question for arithmetic circuits is "What is the most efficient way to compute a particular polynomial?"
Arithmetic circuits exist as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). Each node that is not pointed to by any other node is called an "input gate" and they are labeled as variables or elements in the domain. The other gates are divided into addition gates and multiplication gates according to their operation type. The arithmetic formula refers to a circuit in which the out-degree of each gate is 1, and the graph structure becomes a directed tree.
The complexity measurement of arithmetic circuits involves two basic indicators: size and depth. The size of a circuit refers to the number of gates in it, while the depth is the longest directed path in the circuit. To take a concrete example, suppose there is a circuit of size six and depth two. Such a structure calculates the polynomial marked by the input gate through a specific process, and calculates the result through addition gate and multiplication gate operations respectively.
Arithmetic circuits calculate by using input gates to compute the polynomials they label, and then use addition and multiplication gates to perform more complex operations.
In the study of computational complexity of polynomials, finding suitable circuits is crucial. The results of this type of work can be divided into upper bounds and lower bounds. The upper bound is to find a circuit that can calculate a specific polynomial, which shows the upper limit of the computational complexity of the polynomial; the lower bound requires proving that no other circuit can calculate faster than the proposed circuit, which is often a more challenging problem. Sexual tasks.
For example, Strassen's algorithm performs matrix multiplications with size of about n².807, which is a significant improvement over the traditional n³ complexity. Others, such as Berkowitz, have also proposed a way to efficiently calculate determinants and perpetual polynomials using circuits of polynomial size. These research results undoubtedly provide a more comprehensive perspective on the design and calculation methods of arithmetic circuits.
In the process of polynomial computation, the currently known lower bound proofs are still limited, and the main research focus is on exploring the lower bounds of small degree polynomials.
One of the open problems in arithmetic circuits is the P versus NP problem, and the so-called VP versus VNP problem is its "algebraic analogue". VP stands for the class of polynomials with polynomial circuits, and VNP is the class of related polynomials used to prove that some polynomials are computationally feasible.
The basic concept of this existence is completeness in complexity theory. If a polynomial is a complete polynomial of a certain class, it means that if there is a small circuit for this polynomial, then other polynomials in this class also have the same nature. At present, there is still no conclusion that proves that VP and VNP are not equal, which is one of the keys to future research.
The study of arithmetic circuits is not limited to the mathematical community, but also involves a wide range of computing fields, challenging our understanding and cognition of computational complexity.
In this advancing field, arithmetic circuits provide important mathematical tools that help us understand the computational complexity of polynomials. However, in future research, can we truly uncover the deep secrets behind these mathematical operations?