In international law, there is a fundamental difference between treaties and ordinary contracts. Firstly, a treaty is a legal document signed between states that is intended to create legally binding obligations and usually deals with major matters of international relations such as trade, peace, security, etc. A general contract is usually a legal agreement between two or more parties involving the transfer of money, services, or goods.
The operation of a treaty is not limited to domestic law, but is also subject to the framework of international law, which gives it a global impact.
Under international law, a treaty is a binding international agreement. It must be signed, approved, and made effective, usually following a specific procedure. The key feature of treaties is that they are not simply private agreements, but international legal documents designed to create legal obligations. When countries sign a treaty, they are bound to abide by the terms of the treaty, which is different from an ordinary contract, because the violation of an ordinary contract often leads to civil litigation between the parties and the courts to resolve the dispute.
In the context of a treaty, trust and cooperation between states are the basis for a constructive relationship, whereas this is less critical in an ordinary contract.
The treaty signing process is typically more formal, involving diplomatic negotiations, ratification procedures, and the involvement of multiple countries. They are negotiated at international conferences and usually signed by official representatives of countries. In contrast, the formation of an ordinary contract is relatively simple and only requires the consent of the parties involved. This difference makes the implementation and monitoring of treaties in international law more complicated and requires the assistance of international institutions or courts to ensure compliance by countries.
The performance of treaties is subject to the provisions of international law, and their interpretation usually needs to take into account the principles of international law, including the requirement of "good faith performance". The performance of ordinary contracts mainly depends on the domestic legal system, which usually allows the parties to reach different interpretations of the terms through negotiation, which is very common in commercial practice.
“Good faith performance” is a key concept in international law, especially in the implementation of treaties, which means that countries should comply with their international obligations in good faith.
In the context of a treaty, the consequences of breach are often more severe than in an ordinary contract, as treaty violation may result in international sanctions or damage to diplomatic relations. The International Court of Justice and other international institutions deal with disputes over breach of treaties, whereas breach of ordinary contracts is usually dealt with by domestic courts and may result solely in monetary damages or the termination of the contract.
While both treaties and ordinary contracts involve the creation of rights and obligations, their legal basis and scope of application are very different. The binding force of an ordinary contract depends on the consensus between the parties, while the binding force of a treaty is based on the universal norms of international law and the expectations of the international community. The nature of treaties means that they often play an important role in maintaining international order and cooperation, while ordinary contracts are mainly limited to commercial and personal transactions.
ConclusionThe existence of treaties is not only a legal requirement, but also an element in international political and economic interactions.
In general, treaties and ordinary contracts have their own unique features in terms of legal nature, formation process, performance interpretation, and remedies after breach of contract. These differences not only affect the parties entering into a treaty or contract, but also have a significant impact on how the international community operates and the adaptability of its legal environment. In the face of the ever-changing international situation, we cannot help but think about how we should better understand the interaction and balance between treaties and general contracts in international law?