In Germany, there is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting scientific skepticism - the German Association for Scientific Skepticism (GWUP), whose mission and goals have been influencing the entire society. Founded in 1987, GWUP aims to criticize and explore various unproven beliefs and claims, from alternative medicine to astrology and the paranormal, and to analyze these issues using scientific methods. After exploring the history and influence of GWUP, we will find that behind scientific skepticism, there are not only cold data and analysis, but also many unknown stories.
“The goal of GWUP is to enhance the public’s critical thinking, promote understanding of the scientific method, and apply this thinking to the study of various pseudosciences.”
The formation of the GWUP was inspired by predecessor organizations, such as the German Society for Combating Quackery, founded in 1903. The genes of these organizations were passed down to the GWUP, making it not only the leading skeptical group in the German-speaking area, but also part of the international skeptical movement. In addition to regular conferences, a series of experiments and social movements are also carried out to promote critical thinking. These initiatives are not limited to the scientific community, but have gradually permeated into all levels of society. From school education to media reporting, GWUP is working hard to speak out and challenge false claims.
The annual conference held by GWUP is not only an occasion to showcase its efforts to the public, but also a stage to attract experts and scholars to gather. From the "Fact or Fiction" conference in 2011 to the 2019 conference in Augsburg, GWUP has continued to focus on various issues related to scientific skepticism and provide a platform for in-depth discussions.
“GWUP’s scientific experiments on paranormal phenomena are always based on scientific methods and aim to uncover the truth behind these phenomena.”
In addition, GWUP hosts the renowned "Gold Award" (Das Goldene Brett vorm Kopf) to expose those who make false claims that are inconsistent with the science. These awards serve as a wake-up call, reminding the public to be wary of all kinds of lies claiming to have supernatural powers. Every year, the award winners become social topics, promoting public attention and discussion on these issues.
In terms of social education, the impact of GWUP cannot be underestimated. The organization intervened in a public school in Hamburg in 2012, hoping to prevent the school from adopting the Waldorf method of education and to promote education centered on modern scientific views. This has caused a stir in the education community, causing people to rethink the boundaries between science, religion and superstition.
GWUP's actions are not without controversy, however. Sociologist Edgar Vendell criticized the group for its overemphasis on naturalism and its failure to investigate certain supernatural claims. He pointed out that GWUP has, to some extent, fostered internal and external biases and may not be able to achieve true scientific skepticism as it claims.
"All valid internal and external criticism will be taken seriously, and this is the direction we will work towards in the future."
With the advancement of technology, GWUP has also begun to use social media and online platforms to promote science. From the quarterly magazine "The Skeptic" it publishes to the various blogs updated online, all of these have made its voice more widespread and deeply rooted in people's hearts. Through the power of these self-media, GWUP can communicate with the public more effectively and effectively promote critical thinking brainstorming.
Even though GWUP’s achievements in the field of scientific skepticism are significant, future challenges remain. With the diversification of information sources, false information and superstitious beliefs remain important issues in today's society. While GWUP promotes science, it also needs to address barriers to public understanding of science. Therefore, continuing education and the dissemination of critical thinking remain an important issue.
How to ensure that the concept of scientific skepticism can still influence the public and promote rational thinking in the future is a question that deserves deep thought from each of us?