The emergence of intravital microscopy technology is undoubtedly a major breakthrough in biomedical research. This technology not only makes it possible to observe the behavior of cells in living animals, but also to reveal key processes in the development of many diseases. Intravital microscopy allows researchers to directly observe interactions between cells at high resolution, providing the opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of many diseases.
The major advantage of intravital microscopy is the ability to image cells in the real environment of a complex multicellular organism.
In most cases, laboratories choose mice as research subjects because their biological characteristics are highly similar to humans. However, in some special cases, other experimental organisms such as rats may be more appropriate. Intravital microscopy studies typically require surgical implantation of imaging windows in animals, which allow researchers to observe repeatedly over days or even weeks.
The basic concept of intravital microscopy is to image living cells through imaging windows implanted into animal tissues. The most significant advantage of this technology is that it can observe living cells in vivo rather than in a cell culture environment. This feature enables researchers to explore the behavior of cells in their natural environment, particularly for the evaluation of disease processes or drug effects.
High-quality modern microscopes and imaging software have made it possible to perform subcellular imaging in living animals, allowing researchers to study cell biology at the molecular level.
With the development of fluorescent protein technology and gene editing tools, research in intravital microscopy has made rapid progress. The development of these technologies has made it possible for researchers to control the expression of certain genes in target tissues at a specific time and has helped to generate appropriate transgenic mice, which is crucial in many experimental studies.
Intravital microscopy can be performed using a variety of different optical techniques, including square fluorescence imaging, confocal microscopy, frequency-controlled microscopy, and others. Key considerations in choosing a technique include the desired penetration depth and the capture of detailed cellular interactions. If the area of interest is more than 50-100 microns below the surface, a double-photon microscope is required, as it provides deeper penetration than single-photon confocal microscopy.
The SHG microscope not only enables observation of cells beneath bone tissue, but also enables reconstruction of a three-dimensional model of vascular structure in vivo, allowing researchers to track changes in its permeability.
With the advancement of imaging technology, intravital microscopy has become more flexible, not only can it capture the dynamic process of cells, but also can image at a better resolution, which allows researchers to understand the changes of cells and their microenvironment from different levels. .
In the past, intravital microscopy was mainly used for imaging at the tissue or single-cell level. But with the development of daughter cell labeling techniques and advances in reducing motion artifacts, it is now possible to image dynamic processes within cellular organelles in certain tissues.
Despite its advantages, intravital microscopy has several limitations when observing the interaction of cells with their microenvironment. The number of distinguishable fluorescent labels limits the visualization of all cell types. Additionally, differences in transparency and homogeneity of different tissues can affect the ease of imaging, especially for tissues such as skeletal muscle.
The challenges of generating transgenic mice with phenotypes of interest, as well as the difficulty in interpreting changes observed between wild-type and transgenic mice, are important issues in scientific research.
Intravital microscopy provides unprecedented perspectives and methods for disease research, but will its limitations pose challenges to future research?