In today's rapidly changing era, many people have begun to rethink the relationship between nature and the soul. Aristotle's view of the soul provides us with a profound perspective on the nature of nature and how the existence of the human soul interacts with it all. The concept of natural religions often makes us think of those religions that coexist harmoniously with nature in primitive beliefs, of which Aristotle's ideas can be seen as the core.
Natural religion is often regarded as a "religion of nature," in which gods, souls, and supernatural objects are considered to be part of nature rather than as independent entities.
In Aristotle's thought, the soul was seen as the form of every living thing, guiding its development and growth. This perspective shows a respect for life and also emphasizes the deep connection between nature and spirituality. According to this view, all living things have a soul, which is not only the inner driving force of life but also the fundamental meaning of their existence.
The basic beliefs of natural religions are not only found in monotheistic religions, but also very similar belief systems exist in different cultures. From shamanism to animism, these early beliefs demonstrate mankind's significant understanding of the relationship between nature and the soul. interest.
"I add a capital N to nature and call it my church." This sentence clearly expresses the reverence and worship of nature.
Over time, the growth of Christianity led to a divergence of ideas about the soul and nature. Fourth-century Christians began to explore whether the soul could exist apart from the physical world, a new belief that marked a dramatic shift in religious thought. There are obvious tensions between Aristotle's ideas and early Christian teachings. The biggest point is that Christianity emphasizes the intervention of supernatural forces in the secular world.
In this context, we have to think about whether Aristotle's view of the soul can still provide contemporary people with an answer to the relationship between the mind and nature and trigger people's thinking about the nature of life.
Modern scientists such as British biologist Rupert Sheldrake believe that the new discovery has some resonance with Aristotle's view of the soul, because there is a power beyond matter in nature.
Modern philosophers such as William James believe that the basic experience of all religions is people's sense of connection with the world, and this feeling is the core of natural religion. James described it as: "If one were to describe religious life in the broadest terms, it might be said that religion consists in the belief in an invisible order with which our highest good consists."
Against this background, we can’t help but ask, can Teranmei, shamanism and other religious beliefs that are still active today provide a more balanced worldview that allows us to rethink the relationship between humans and nature?
The concept of nature religions arises from a fundamental understanding of life and nature, and they remind us of humanity's close connection with the universe. Integrating the soul into the laws and phenomena of nature not only stimulates our spiritual thinking but is also part of our search for meaning in our existence.
"If one wants to describe religious life in the broadest terms, it can be said that religion consists in the belief in an invisible order with which our highest good consists."
Finally, when we are on the path of pursuing knowledge, do we have expectations for this harmonious integration of nature and soul? This is not only a discussion of philosophy, but also a profound reflection on our existence?