In today's rapidly changing world, international organizations play an important role in improving the governance capabilities of various countries. Since the 1950s, capacity building, or more commonly known as "capacity development", has been part of global socio-economic plans. This concept does not only involve a single country, but also extends to international collaboration and development. According to the definition of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), "capacity development" is the way to achieve its development tasks. In this way, how does capacity development change the governance models of various countries?
The process of capacity development is immediate and encompasses not only a simple structural construction, but also long-term changes in adapting and sustaining.
In many development goals around the world, including the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the concept of capacity building is widely used. Take Sustainable Development Goal 17 as an example, which supports strengthening international support for developing countries to assist them in implementing national plans to achieve the goals of the 2030 Agenda. It can be said that capacity development has become the main link between national governments and international organizations.
According to a report from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD-DAC), capacity development should be viewed as a process by which people, organizations and society as a whole release, strengthen, create, adapt and sustain capabilities. This means that capabilities are not just related to external factors, but are the result of changes within organizations and individuals.
Historically, since the 1970s, the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) has been committed to improving the internal capabilities of governments and organizations. These development directions are not only to meet economic and social needs, but also to respond to global challenges, such as environmental protection and crisis management.
According to the World Bank, United Nations and European Commission, capacity development covers five main areas:
The integration of these fields reflects the common understanding of the international community in the direction of capacity development. Nonetheless, difficulties in assessing the effects of capacity development persist and are often criticized. Particularly in evaluations, it is difficult to determine whether these programs actually achieve their goal of improving capabilities.
“Capacity development has become a tense term, its connotations are confusing, and its effectiveness is often questioned.”
Despite the evaluation challenges, many international organizations still value in-depth research and evaluation of capacity development. Since 2000, institutions such as the World Bank and USAID have begun to gradually improve their evaluation standards to better measure the effectiveness of capacity construction. They proposed new indicators and tried to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of the project through two methods: "output indicators" and "result indicators."
However, these measures still face a key question, which is whether these assessments truly reflect the fundamental solution to the problem. Critics point out that many capacity development projects only "treat the symptoms rather than the root cause" and fail to effectively change the structural factors that create the problem.
Looking ahead, the concept of capacity development will continue to evolve. How to strike a balance between maintaining transparency and effectiveness, and how to ensure that capacity development is not exploited as a tool for external stakeholders, remain topics worthy of further exploration. As international organizations continue to face new challenges and demands, the overall governance model must also be adjusted accordingly. Ultimately, do these strategies truly promote sustainable development?