A Ponzi scheme is a form of fraud that attracts investors and keeps them running by using funds from new investors to pay returns to earlier investors. The name comes from Charles Ponzi, an Italian businessman who became widely known for the scheme in the early 20th century. The main feature of a Ponzi scheme is that it usually guarantees extremely high returns with almost no risk, and these returns are often claimed to come from a legitimate business activity that does not actually exist.
Ponzi schemes rely on a continuous inflow of funds, and on the fact that most investors will not withdraw their funds at any time.
Charles Ponzi's scheme had been operating in the United States as early as the 1920s, and he claimed that his investments came from arbitrage on international postage receipts. Although the initial investments appeared to be profitable, over time he began using funds from new investors to pay out earlier investors, turning the scheme into a never-ending scam. According to the information, Ponzi's plan would eventually collapse, and many people would suffer heavy losses.
Many Ponzi schemes typically guarantee generous returns on investment and use the profits of old investors to attract new investors.
Before Ponzi, there were already several events that are considered to be modern Ponzi schemes. For example, Adele Spitzer of Germany and Sarah Howe of the United States also used similar methods to defraud many people of their money in the late 19th century. Specifically, Sarah Howe’s “Ladies’ Savings” scheme offered an 8% monthly return, only to walk away with all the funds, resulting in a three-year prison sentence.
Allen Stanford and his counterfeit certificates of deposit are also a famous example of a Ponzi scheme. He used seemingly risk-free investments to defraud numerous investors of their funds. These examples clearly show that Ponzi schemes generally follow a similar pattern and structure regardless of when they were launched.
Ponzi schemes require a constant flow of new funds to survive; if the inflow of new investors decreases, the scheme will collapse.
The success of a Ponzi scheme often depends on the participation of new investors, and when these new funds cannot continue to flow in, it will trigger panic and withdrawal of funds. And once large-scale withdrawals occur, the plan will come to an end. This phenomenon was fully demonstrated in the Madoff incident during the 2008 financial crisis. The market environment at the time caused a large number of investors to rush to withdraw their funds, which ultimately led to the collapse of the plan.
For investors, it is critical to identify red flags of Ponzi schemes, according to guidance from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This includes investments that promise high returns, overly stable returns, and unregistered investments, among other things. For example, any "guaranteed" investment opportunity that claims to be risk-free should raise red flags. These are potential red flags.
Every investment has risks, and excessive returns usually mean greater risks.
Investors should also be wary of complex or secretive investment strategies and problems that arise in investment reports. Additionally, you should be highly suspicious if you experience difficulty or pressure when withdrawing money. These are some of the characteristics that a Ponzi scheme might have.
When a Ponzi scheme collapses, its true nature is usually quickly exposed, and investors find themselves owning assets that do not actually exist. The scheme operators could flee quickly when inflows dwindle, leaving investors with huge losses. In some cases, manipulators can even face criminal charges for their misconduct.
Ponzi schemes typically fail due to a reduction in cash flows or deteriorating market conditions.
In summary, the history of the Ponzi scheme and the story of Charles Ponzi undoubtedly provide us with important lessons and warnings. We should always be vigilant and realize that investing is not an absolutely safe activity. When faced with tempting high-return investments, should we further think about the risks behind them?