In today's medical environment, bacterial and fungal resistance to antibiotics is an increasingly serious problem. The evolution of drug resistance in microorganisms makes treating infections more complex, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing plays a crucial role in this process. MIC refers to the lowest drug concentration that can inhibit the visible growth of microorganisms in vitro. This indicator can provide doctors with an important basis for selecting the most appropriate antimicrobial drugs.
The MIC test was first developed by Alexander Fleming and uses the turbidity of the culture medium to evaluate it. This technology has become an important tool for microbiologists and clinicians.
The process of MIC testing usually involves making a dilution series of the drug, adding culture media, then inoculating bacteria or fungi, and finally culturing at a suitable temperature. The growth status of microorganisms is evaluated by measuring the transparency of the culture medium, and the MIC value is finally obtained. These data not only reflect microbial susceptibility but also provide critical antimicrobial activity indicators in new drug development.
With the discovery and commercialization of antibiotics, MIC testing has gradually matured. In the 1980s, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) integrated the measurement methods and standards for MIC, making it the gold standard in clinical practice. These standards are continually updated in response to the evolution of pathogens and the emergence of new drugs.
Currently, MIC is widely used in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Experimental results are reported with different sensitivity interpretations as "S" (sensitive), "I" (intermediate) and "R" (resistant). These interpretations were developed from CLSI and EUCAST. However, in the clinic, accurate identification of the pathogen is often a challenge, making it more difficult to develop the correct treatment regimen.
Microbial drug resistance is constantly evolving, and the emergence of new pathogens makes MIC testing increasingly important in clinical practice.
As the threat of multidrug-resistant bacteria intensifies, the accurate use of antimicrobials becomes even more important. Selection pressure brought about by inappropriate drug use has become an important factor in the evolution of bacterial resistance. Therefore, determining the MIC value is crucial for selecting the optimal antimicrobial treatment regimen.
The most common MIC determination method is the liquid dilution method, which usually requires three main reagents: culture medium, antimicrobial agent and microorganism to be tested. The culture medium used is generally cationically adjusted Mueller-Hinton medium because it supports the growth of most pathogens and does not inhibit common antibiotics.
During testing, the antimicrobial agent is diluted to the correct concentration and then diluted stepwise into multiple test tubes or wells. Microorganisms need to be inoculated from the same colony-forming unit and incubated, and the MIC is determined based on turbidity.
Etest is an alternative method that is widely used in microbiology laboratories around the world. It consists of a plastic reagent strip with a preset antibiotic concentration gradient, which can quickly and effectively determine the MIC value of various antimicrobial agents.
While MIC focuses on the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent that inhibits growth, the minimum killing concentration (MBC) refers to the lowest concentration that causes bacterial death. MIC values closer to MBC indicate that the compound has a better bactericidal effect. However, MIC is more commonly used clinically because it is easier to determine.
With the mutation of bacteria and the emergence of new pathogens, the need for testing microorganisms is becoming more and more urgent. MIC testing can help doctors make more reasonable treatment choices to deal with the threat of drug resistance to human health.
In this era of evolving microbial resistance, can we find more effective solutions to combat these pathogens that are on the verge of getting out of control?