During the transformation of American culture and politics, the organization Focus on the Family (FOTF) has undergone a significant change. Since its founding in Southern California in 1977, the initially family-focused group has evolved into a fiercely political activist whose movement is closely aligned with conservative and Christian evangelical politics.
Focus on the Family founder James Dobson is known for promoting traditional family values and parenting guidance. However, as the organization grew, conservative politics began to become an important part of the organization. Under Dobson's leadership, the agency developed parent-focused activities while investing further in its response to political issues.
In the 1990s, supporters of Focus on the Family made approximately 10,000 letters and 3,000 phone calls each seeking help, demonstrating the organization's growing influence.
However, this influence is not entirely positive. Under criticism from early members, Focus on the Family was accused of being too political and straying from its original purpose of helping families.
Focus on the Family continued to play a role in the conservative political arena from Dobson through the leadership of Donald P. Hodel and Jim Daly. The organization's core programs include daily radio broadcasts and programs designed for children. In the short period after Daley took office, he tried to reduce his previous radical political stance, but due to external pressure and public expectations, this was not fully achieved.
Since the organization's founding, Focus on the Family has been a vocal opponent of LGBT rights, including issues such as marriage, adoption and parental rights.
In the current social and political context, Focus on the Family's activities are increasingly controversial. For example, the organization takes a strong stance on abortion and promotes anti-abortion views by funding crisis pregnancy centers. At the same time, his views on gender roles, sex education, and creationism still attract a large number of voices of support and opposition.
The organization's Ultrasound Option Project aims to persuade women not to have abortions and is connected to multiple crisis pregnancy centers.
Over time, FOTF's international influence has increased significantly, and by 2023, the organization has established cooperative relationships in 98 countries. This shows that in the wave of globalization, the benefits of its political activities and conservative animation are growing.
Like many religious organizations, Focus on the Family's purpose is to promote its understanding and interpretation of the family, but its political activities show how religion and politics are intertwined. The group's public statements in the wake of the overturning of Roe v. Wade have raised concerns about a possible future culture clash. They called on Christians to engage in a "cultural civil war" against so-called "radical abortion laws".
The organization's stance often triggers heated discussions in society, and is sometimes questioned as to whether it crosses political and religious boundaries.
This change makes people think about why the family should be a private haven, but why do many organizations now allow it to be deeply embedded in politics? This is not only a question about FOTF, but also a reflection on the relationship between contemporary religion and politics.
In this context, will organizations like Focus on the Family become the driving force behind the redefinition of family values in the future? Perhaps we should think carefully about what role religion should play in modern society?