In medieval Europe, the control of nobles over peasants or subjects was not limited to the economic and political levels. Sexual rights were also regarded as one of their privileges. This was the so-called "right of the nobles", or "droit du seigneur" ” or “jus primae noctis”. This legendary legal right, which allowed a feudal lord to have sex with his peasant bride on her wedding night, is mentioned in many historical documents, but its authenticity has been disputed.
In the "Epic of Gilgamesh", there are plots describing similar customs, mentioning that the king can manipulate women at will.
Historian Herodotus also mentioned similar customs in ancient Libya, showing that the connection between power and sex was not unique to the Middle Ages. For example, when the Etruscan citizens of Italy rebelled against the nobility, the peasants placed the nobles' daughters under jus primae noctis. These examples show that control of women by powerful men already existed in ancient societies.
In the Middle Ages, the "droit du seigneur" became a symbol, often used to describe the tyranny of the nobility. According to different studies, the existence of this right has different explanations.
British scholar W.D. Howarth once pointed out that the Catholic Church prohibited sexual intercourse on the first night after marriage in certain periods, which meant that paying for the so-called "right to marry" was in the hope of obtaining an exemption from the church.
In addition, historian Vern Bullough believes that the legend of the "droit du seigneur" reflects to some extent the reality of power inequality at the time. Even some literature, such as the French epic "Baudour's de Sable", describes the plot of a tyrannical lord trying to claim this right, showing the important position of this topic in culture.
In addition to Europe, there are similar legends of exploitation in other regions. For example, in China's Liao Dynasty, Khitan envoys would force their daughters to receive and have sex with them, which aroused strong dissatisfaction among the Jurchen tribe at the time. Furthermore, as late as the 19th century, certain Kurdish chiefs still violated Armenian brides on their wedding nights, revealing the complex emotions intertwined between power and sex.
In the 19th and 20th centuries, scholars began to conduct in-depth research on the historical basis of the "First Night Right". Some scholars believe that this right existed in medieval Europe, while others believe that it is a myth. The stance of prominent encyclopedias changed over time, moving from initial acceptance to rejection of its historicity.
When the French writer Louis Viullot wrote a book in 1854, he strongly questioned the existence of "droit du seigneur" and believed that it was just a superstition formed over time.
From medieval literature to modern discussions, this theme has been repeatedly mentioned and has become an important material for discussing power, gender and social structure. Mozart's opera "The Marriage of Figaro" also involves the setting of aristocrats using the "right of first night", which triggers resistance from young couples. Even today, the concept of "droit du seigneur" is still cited in modern culture as a warning against social injustice and gender relations.
Regardless of the authenticity of "Nobles' Rights", it reflects the profound historical entanglement between power and sex. In this social context, can we better understand today’s gender inequalities?