With the rapid changes in the corporate environment, the development of management theory continues to affect the improvement of productivity and efficiency. Among them, Taylorism, the scientific management theory, has influenced the industrial and business management circles since the end of the 19th century. Although many management theories have been proposed since ancient times, why does this theory still have a place in today's production and management?
Taylorism was proposed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the early 20th century. Its purpose was to improve economic efficiency, especially labor productivity, through scientific analysis and comprehensive processes. Early in the U.S. steel industry, Taylor decided to explore how to improve the efficiency of each process after observing the inertial performance of workers. He joined the Meadville Steel Company in 1877 and was gradually promoted to foreman. This experience made him deeply see the negative impact of "soldier-like" work on production efficiency.
Taylor proposed that scientific management includes four core principles: "developing a true science", "scientific selection of workers", "scientific education and training of workers", and "cooperation between managers and workers". The implementation of these principles requires not only clear work assignments for workers, but also the provision of standard conditions and tools to achieve work goals.
"The art of management can be defined as knowing clearly what you want workers to do and making sure they do it in the best and most economical way."
As time evolves, many management theories continue to appear in the business world, but the high efficiency advocated by Taylorism is still valued by today's enterprises. Many modern operations management methods, such as lean production and Six Sigma, are derived from the concept of scientific management methods. To this day, companies often refer to Taylor's principles when formulating production strategies to reduce waste and increase productivity.
Although Taylorism achieved good results in improving work efficiency, its controlling management style also aroused strong opposition from labor unions. Many workers criticized this management model for sacrificing their autonomy at work and leading to strained relationships with managers. In 1911, with the implementation of Taylorism, some unions split and launched protests against scientific management.
"The greatest evil of scientific management is its control over workers, causing them to lose their sovereignty over their work."
At present, the principles of scientific management are still widely used in enterprises, whether in manufacturing or service industries. Through precise working hours analysis and process reorganization, many companies use Taylorism to adapt to the ever-changing market demands. However, with the advancement of technology, many jobs are moving towards automation and digitization. Facing the future, how to comprehensively use technology and human resources in management has become a major challenge for enterprises.
No matter how time evolves, can the concept of scientific management still adapt to future needs and changes? This will be a question that all companies must consider carefully when pursuing economic benefits?