Language
Country/Area
No result found
The Amazing Minimally Invasive Heart Surgery: How It Reduces Pain and Recovery Time After Surgery?
With the advancement of medical technology, minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has gradually become an ideal treatment option. This surgical method can not only reduce the patient's pain, but also speed up recovery. Compared with traditional thoracotomy surgery, minimally invasive surgery provides more advantages and makes cardiac surgery more humane.
Minimally invasive cardiac surgery can be performed with smaller incisions, allowing patients to endure less trauma and pain, improving their quality of life.
Common characteristics of minimally invasive cardiac surgery
Minimally invasive cardiac surgery mainly covers various cardiac surgical procedures, including aortic valve replacement, mitral valve repair, coronary artery surgical bypass, etc. These surgeries are usually performed through a slight incision (such as a mini-thoracic incision or mini-sternal incision) to minimize trauma during the procedure.
Details of MICS CABG surgery process
MICS CABG (minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery) is an alternative to traditional open-heart surgery through several small incisions. This method significantly reduces the amount of bleeding during the operation and significantly reduces postoperative discomfort, and the patient's recovery speed is also accelerated. During the operation, doctors use special instruments to stabilize the heart. The operation is usually performed without the heart stopping. This is also called "non-stop surgery."
Such surgical procedures make it possible for many patients who were considered too high-risk in the past to undergo cardiac surgery, greatly broadening the treatment population.
Recovery and effects after surgery
According to clinical studies, patients who undergo minimally invasive surgery can usually return to their daily activities within a few weeks of surgery. In comparison, traditional thoracotomy surgery requires longer hospital stays and recovery times. Postoperatively, patients receive pain medication and nursing care, and drain tubes are removed before discharge. However, these patients generally have a better quality of life after surgery and have fewer postoperative complications compared to traditional surgery.
The unique advantages of minimally invasive surgery
Minimally invasive heart surgery reduces postoperative pain, reduces the risk of infection and the possibility of bleeding. In addition, this surgical method can also provide good cosmetic results, and the patient's wounds are more hidden than traditional surgeries. For female patients, the scars are likely to go completely unnoticed. Doctors have also found that recovery from this type of surgery is relatively less stressful and has a positive impact on the patient's overall health.
We have seen that minimally invasive technology not only improves patients' physiological conditions, but also improves their mental health, allowing them to return to normal life faster.
Results of clinical studies
With the popularity of minimally invasive surgery, more and more studies have shown its superiority. A study published in 2013 pointed out that MICS CABG is not only safe and feasible, but also has satisfactory postoperative health conditions. About 92% of patients feel no discomfort after surgery. What this all means is that minimally invasive surgery is well suited for patients currently in need of surgery.
History and development
The pioneer of minimally invasive cardiac surgery is Dr. Joseph T. McGinn. Since 2005, he has led N's team to pioneer the field of cardiac surgery and pioneered minimally invasive technology. application. Today, more and more medical institutions are beginning to try this surgical method, including the Ottawa Heart Center in Canada and the Medbeck Heart Center in Houston, Texas.
With the continuous advancement of technology, minimally invasive surgery will provide a wider range of options for heart disease patients, including patients who cannot be treated by traditional surgery. With more data support and better applications, will more patients enjoy this innovative surgical method in the future?
