In modern democratic systems, elections are an important way to express public opinion, but the problem of electoral fraud has challenged the fairness of this system. Election fraud can include vote tampering, manipulation of the electoral process, and improper influence of voters. According to investigations, fraud occurred in elections in many countries, which not only undermined democratic principles but also affected people's trust in the government. So, which countries have experienced such electoral fraud?
Electoral fraud, also known as election manipulation or voter fraud, refers to illegal interference in the electoral process. This behavior can increase a candidate's vote count or depress his opponent's vote count. These actions vary in each country's understanding and enforcement of the law; however, they often share the goal of subverting election results.
Even the smallest fraud can affect the outcome, and when fraud is revealed, it can erode voters' trust in the democratic system.
In the United States, due to the sovereignty of states over elections, many electoral fraud issues are considered state crimes. These frauds include voter impersonation, double voting and ballot stuffing. The U.S. federal government prosecutes certain crimes in elections (such as voter intimidation, election fraud conspiracy, etc.), and penalties include fines, imprisonment, and loss of voting rights. For example: In some states, officials who change voting rules at will can be severely punished.
Manipulation in elections can occur before a formal vote is cast. This can be achieved by changing the composition of the electorate, and some countries may even use "artificial immigration" or "party list manipulation" to bias election results.
For example, in Malaysia, the government changed the outcome of elections by granting citizenship and voting rights to immigrants.
Another extremely common form of manipulation is voter deprivation. This includes setting high barriers to voting requirements, such as literacy tests or identification, that unfairly impact minorities and other communities. Historically, many southern states adopted these measures before the Civil Rights Movement, resulting in large numbers of African Americans being denied the right to vote.
Intimidation and violence during elections cannot be ignored either. This includes direct threats against supporters of a particular ethnic group or political party. For example, in 1984, the Oregon election saw organized intimidation aimed at weakening political opponents.
Voters are not only influenced by candidates, but also often face pressure and threats from other forces.
Publishing false information is also a common manipulation tactic in many cases. For example, during the 2011 Canadian election, there were rumors that polling locations had changed, resulting in many voters being unable to cast their votes. Such incidents not only affect turnout, but further damage voters’ trust in elections.
In short, electoral fraud is an emerging problem around the world, posing a potential threat to democratic systems. Whether through manipulation of the electorate, intimidation or the dissemination of misinformation, these misconduct seek to undermine public trust and confidence in the democratic process. Going forward, agencies and organizations must strengthen the security of elections to prevent this type of fraud. An election that can accommodate diverse voices is the cornerstone of a sound democracy. When facing these challenges, we can’t help but ask: How to ensure that every voter’s voice is heard correctly in the election?