Super injection rooms (SIS) are a health and social response to the drug problem. They provide a safe space for drug users to practice drug use under professional supervision.
Across the world, the number of super-injection rooms is growing year by year, aiming to reduce overdose deaths due to drug use, reduce the risk of disease transmission due to unhygienic injections, and provide drug users with a connection to addiction treatment and other health Social service opportunities.
As the global drug abuse problem becomes more and more important, the number of super injection rooms has spread to many countries including Canberra, Mexico and the United States since they first appeared in Europe in Switzerland, Germany and the Netherlands in the early 2000s.
According to the latest report, more than 100 similar facilities will be operating around the world in 2022. The centers provide services primarily to people who engage in high-risk drug-taking behaviours. For example, the Medically Supervised Injection Center (MSIC) in Sydney has shown significant positive results since becoming a permanent facility in 2010, providing essential medical services in addition to reducing overdose incidents.
Some supporters believe that these facilities not only save lives but also strengthen the connection of community health services. However, many opponents believe that these facilities encourage drug use and trigger surrounding crime.
Discussions about super-injection rooms are often contentious, with voices coming and going from supporters to opponents. Supporters argue that these facilities can effectively reduce public drug use and reduce drug-related illness, mortality, and crime rates. Opponents argue that the facilities will make communities less safe and encourage drug use.
In the Netherlands, many drug addicts use these facilities as shelters to cut off contact with the outside world. Experts point out that super injection rooms provide a safe environment, however, businesses in some communities say that social order and public safety in the vicinity have declined since the facilities were opened. They see increased drug dealing and public drug use impacting their businesses, while surrounding residents face the challenge of living quietly.
In some communities in Victoria, residents and shop owners are divided over the operation of super injection rooms, research shows. They are worried about the safety of their living environment.
Many studies have shown that the existence of super injection rooms does not seem to have caused an increase in the number of drug users, but has had a positive impact on public health. Taking Sydney as an example, a temporal study in the city found that the opening of injecting rooms reduced the number of public injection incidents and even changed people's social understanding and views of drug users.
However, the situation in some cities is different. For example, in some U.S. cities, authorities have tried to set up super injection rooms but have encountered legal and financial obstacles. Even approved facilities sometimes fail to operate due to a lack of ongoing funding, creating a difficult situation for drug addicts seeking help in these facilities.
The Safehouse organization's plan to open a safe injecting room in Philadelphia was strongly opposed by local residents, which shows the complex situation facing the community, where many residents' ordinary concerns about drugs and public safety are intertwined.
The operation, effectiveness and impact of super injection rooms on communities remain important issues for future public health and social policy. Whether these facilities can truly become an effective tool to solve the drug problem depends not only on the support of the government, but also on the understanding and participation of the community.
Currently, as more and more research and data show the positive impact of super injection rooms, many regions are beginning to consider policy adjustments to create a safer and healthier living environment. However, this process has not been smooth sailing, and there are still many challenges, especially in terms of social cognition and policy support.
Against this backdrop, how can communities, professionals, and policymakers collaborate to face this challenge and ultimately create an environment that both reduces risk and promotes social safety?