German sociologist Max Weber proposed a three-component theory of social stratification, which is also called Weberian stratification or a three-category system. Weber viewed class, status, and party as three distinct ideal types and developed a multidimensional approach to social stratification that reflected the interplay between wealth, prestige, and power. Weber argued that power can take many forms, and that an individual's power is reflected through his or her social status, economic class, and political party. Therefore, class, status, and party are all aspects of the distribution of power within a community.
The use of power not only affects their respective fields, but may also have a profound impact on other fields.
According to Weber's theory, wealth includes various assets, such as real estate, land, factories, etc.; prestige is the degree of respect a person or status has in the eyes of others; and power is what an individual or group can achieve even in the face of opposition from others. its target capabilities. Weber distinguished between the two basic dimensions of having power and exercising power, and emphasized how the ability to control these social resources affects an individual's position in society.
The possession of power comes from the control of various social resources, including land, capital, social respect, etc.
According to Weber, the ability of individuals to hold power comes from the diversity of social resources they control. This means that different social resources such as land, capital and their corresponding social status will affect an individual's power and influence in society.
Power is exercised in many ways, and all forms of power subordinate others to its will, even if those others are able to resist. For example, an individual's social prestige, class status, and membership in a political party can affect their chances of realizing their will.
If individuals can effectively influence the decision-making process, they still have power even if they do not personally exercise it.
Weber pointed out that class is essentially an economic concept, and an individual's position in the market determines his class status. The concept of class emphasizes differences in access to material resources, which directly affect an individual's life chances. For example, in the relationship between employers and employees, the party with resources often has an advantage in the exercise of power.
Social power is often expressed through the constraints or categories of social status, for example, the existence of social groups and their exclusive patterns of interaction. If a person is respected or viewed as socially superior by others, then such a person is able to exercise a certain degree of power over others. Weber emphasized that not all power is accompanied by social honor. Unlike pure economic power, social status itself is a social resource.
As part of a social organization, a political party strives to gain power for its leaders within the organization or country and is committed to achieving ideal or material interests. The expression of this power is closely related to the way modern social systems are organized, especially whether it can influence the process of making laws.
There is a close connection between social action and political power. According to Weber's observation, the impact of law depends on the actions and participation of members of a social class. In this process, the awakening of individual social consciousness and action has a significant impact on the power structure. Furthermore, as the number of members of a class increases, the likelihood of collective action climbs as well.
Weber believed that class status limits an individual's scope of action and creates obstacles to upward mobility, but in capitalist society, inter-class mobility is possible. This is also the meaning of the "American Dream", which symbolizes the opportunity to achieve social mobility through hard work and creativity. Weber divided four social classes, including the propertied class, the proletariat, the petty bourgeoisie and the manual labor class.
The extent to which individuals can succeed in society still depends on the social environment and structure they face.
In summary, Weber's theory of social stratification provides a framework for understanding the complex interactions between power, status, and wealth. These three elements are intertwined and create different balances of power in the continuously changing social landscape. Perhaps thinking about one’s own place in this framework and the possibility of social mobility can inspire deeper self-reflection and understanding?