In the current urban warfare environment, tactical requirements not only stop on the ground, but also extend below the ground and in the air. This all-round three-dimensional security concept is called "three-dimensional tactical analysis." This methodology extends traditional tactics to combat situations facing peak crowds and complex urban structures.
"Three-dimensional tactics refer to tactics involving the space above the ground and underground in land and urban combat."
Three-dimensional tactics were developed from the concept of circular security, a model that identifies key phenomena in urban environments. By using vertical trip wires instead of horizontal sieges, combatants can gain intelligence and enhance security within urban cover points. This kind of tactical thinking emphasizes the importance of three-dimensional security and prevents military operations from relying solely on fixed linear thinking.
The concept of three-dimensional tactics was first proposed by Italian military theorist Giuseppe Fiorafanzo and developed in the history of naval warfare. As the war progresses, the need for three-dimensional space tactics becomes stronger, especially in complex combat environments such as cities.
"The three-dimensional tactical model is represented by a cube and covers potential enemies on the ground, underground and above each building."
Through this model, tactical analysis can be conducted more comprehensively, especially during peak hours and large gatherings, when all possible enemy-friendly dynamics emerge in the four-dimensional space, stimulating the need for advanced tactics.
The "cube" concept of three-dimensional tactics, as a visualization tool, defines the combat space. This involves not only the traditional ground battle space, but also the three-dimensional shapes formed by various buildings in the air and urban environments. This kind of cube is generally considered to cover an area of 300 square meters, which meets the effective range requirements of many weapons.
"The cube concept of three-dimensional tactics was fully applied and developed in World War II."
Swarm tactics are particularly important in the category of three-dimensional tactics. This method usually involves multiple entities attacking the target from different directions at the same time. How these tactics can be successfully executed in an urban environment, both from the ground and at the different levels mentioned above, requires in-depth analysis.
To understand why these tactics are successful, the first two concepts that need to be discussed are the relationship between "intelligence warfare" and "command and control." Effective information warfare has the potential to provide forces with a decision-making advantage on the battlefield, especially in highly dynamic environments.
Three-dimensional tactical analysis is closely related to concepts such as airspace combat and simultaneous tactical operations. These reinforce the importance of three-dimensional spatial awareness, enabling commanders to conduct precise strategic applications in complex environments.
"The concept of simultaneous tactical operations originates from the multiple simultaneous maneuvers and firings described by Richard Simpkin. This is a continuous and dynamic performance of tactical behavior."
In recent years, the use of geographic information systems (GIS) has had an important impact on the conceptualization of three-dimensional tactical analysis. This so-called "all-around" approach allows commanders to simultaneously consider operations upward, downward, and horizontally in a complex multidimensional environment.
"This method can effectively overcome the information confusion in traditional warfare and make tactical thinking sharper."
In the context of urban combat, combatants not only need to have superb skills, but also have the ability to clarify their thoughts in a chaotic environment. With the advancement of technology, the methods of tactical analysis will gradually become diversified and three-dimensional, and future urban combat may be a completely new challenge.
After all, in the face of a completely complex urban environment, how should we further improve the application and understanding of three-dimensional tactics in order to gain the initiative in future wars?