With the advancement of medical technology, more and more heart disease patients are choosing peritoneal dialysis as a treatment for kidney failure. This form of dialysis not only removes excess fluid and toxins from the body, but also provides greater flexibility during treatment. According to reports, peritoneal dialysis is more effective than traditional hemodialysis in the first two years, making this therapy gradually more popular among patients.
Peritoneal dialysis is undoubtedly a more inclusive treatment for heart disease patients. While improving the quality of life, it is more likely to maintain long-term kidney health.
The treatment principle of peritoneal dialysis is relatively simple. By placing a permanent catheter in the abdomen, a specific dialysis solution is introduced, and the peritoneum is used as a dialysis membrane to exchange solutes. There are two main methods of this process. The first is continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), in which patients can change dialysate at any time in daily life; the other is automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), in which patients use a machine to automatically Replace dialysate.
For many heart disease patients, the greatest advantages of peritoneal dialysis are its flexibility and tolerability. Compared with hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis does not cause drastic changes in the internal burden of the body and is particularly important for maintaining heart function. In addition, peritoneal dialysis offers the flexibility of being performed at home, allowing many patients to enjoy a higher quality of life without frequent visits to the hospital.
Research shows that peritoneal dialysis can reduce the number of hospitalizations and improve the quality of life in patients with heart disease.
Peritoneal dialysis is not without risks, however. Peritonitis is one of the most common complications and may occur due to unclean intubation practices or other causes of infection in the abdominal cavity. Many patients need to regularly check the color and transparency of the dialysate during treatment, and pay attention to whether there is pain or swelling in the abdomen at any time.
Peritoneal dialysis may not be appropriate in some cases, especially those with a history of past abdominal surgery or inflammatory bowel disease. Therefore, before choosing a treatment modality, doctors will conduct a detailed evaluation of the patient's medical history to ensure that the chosen treatment strategy is both safe and effective.
The adoption of peritoneal dialysis is not only affected by medical technology, economic factors also play a crucial role. In some countries, peritoneal dialysis has become part of the social health care system because its cost is relatively lower than hemodialysis. Therefore, the promotion of peritoneal dialysis by the government and medical institutions has also increased people's awareness and acceptance to a certain extent.
Across the world, access to peritoneal dialysis is often closely tied to a country's financial situation.
The potential of peritoneal dialysis continues to be explored, and as new technologies and methods continue to emerge, its use in patients with heart disease and kidney disease may become increasingly widespread. Scientific research continues to reveal the advantages and disadvantages of peritoneal dialysis and seeks to improve existing technology to improve treatment effectiveness.
In general, peritoneal dialysis, as an important renal replacement therapy, has significant results and potential, especially for patients with heart disease. However, the increasing number of choices also means that patients need to make careful decisions. Only through full understanding can they make the choice that is best for them. Will patients choose peritoneal dialysis as their first choice of treatment options in the future?