In today's global health environment, priority setting has become a key process for countries to formulate health policies. This process not only involves the allocation of resources, but also affects the lives and health of countless people. Whether governments, nonprofits, or private donors, they must make choices about which health interventions to prioritize.
Priority setting is the act of deciding which health interventions to pursue, and this process can occur at multiple levels.
Priority setting is multi-level, including:
In the priority-setting process, various roles play different roles. Among them, include:
According to Devi Sridhar, a global health expert at the University of Edinburgh: "The priorities of funding agencies largely determine the health problems and diseases studied."
Although this process is intended to reflect population needs, in practice policymakers often face challenges when setting priorities. These include:
Priority setting at the global level has been taking place since at least the 1980s, but these efforts have focused on only a few aspects. While many organizations and programs have been working on priority setting for years, the results are often confusing.
Some studies have pointed out that priority setting efforts often rely on consensus reached by expert groups, and the results are not systematically displayed, resulting in unreasonable and fair presentation to the external public.
Many advocates, researchers, and policymakers may label almost any disease, condition, or intervention a "health priority," creating much confusion. Priority setting is influenced by multiple factors, including the reliability of data, value judgments and equality considerations.
How do current health policy challenges and priority-setting processes impact our future health path?