In the context of globalization, third-country nationality (TCN) has gradually become a popular term in the work organization and international contracts of digital multinational companies. However, behind what this term represents, there are many unknown and bitter stories hidden. Third-country workers often face unfair working conditions and lack of legal protections, especially in U.S. contractor contracts, where their role is both important and contradictory.
Third-country nationality refers to persons who do not belong to the country of the contract or the country in which the mission is performed. For example, in U.S. government contracts these personnel are often workers from other countries who may be providing necessary support and services around the world. These workers are not limited to military-related positions but also include other industries such as construction and engineering.
In the United States, the definition of a TCN is relative to the distinction between a contracting government and an operating area (AO).
According to reports, third-country workers employed under U.S. contracts often face poor working conditions. Their living conditions are often inferior to those of their American colleagues, so injuries and deaths often occur while working in high-risk areas. To make matters worse, many TCN workers are required to work for four consecutive years in their contracts and often receive wages below the minimum wage.
Many TCN workers are forced to pay back part of their salary because they hired agents or representatives, a system that further deepens their economic plight.
Since 2006, the Pentagon has introduced strict labor protection policies for contractors, especially targeting the exploitation and low treatment of laborers. Still, problems persist, with contractors still reporting poor worker conditions, demonstrating the difficulties in implementing the policy.
In Europe, the definition of third-country nationality originates from EU law, especially the norms governing nationality status in non-EU countries. Compared with the situation in the United States, the management and enforcement of TCNs in Europe may be scarce, and there is no comprehensive protection or recognition of their rights. This situation makes TCNs working in Europe feel that they are not valued and ignored.
The situation of third-country nationals in Europe also reflects an institutional exclusion, which makes them face greater restrictions on movement and employment.
In the United States and Europe, the situation of third-country workers is worrying, but their contributions are often ignored. This involves not only the improvement of labor conditions, but also the protection of human rights and responsibilities under international contracts. With the continued development of the global economy, how to face and solve the problems faced by TCN has become an important issue in the future. Should we respect each other's rights and interests of every worker, so as to jointly establish a fair working environment?