Effect of a Community Health Worker-Delivered Parental Education and Counseling Intervention on Anemia Cure Rates in Rural Indian Children: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Abstract

Importance\nIron deficiency anemia, the largest cause of anemia worldwide, adversely affects cognitive development in children. Moreover, the imperceptible childhood anemia prevalence reduction in response to anemia control measures is associated with tremendous social and economic cost.\n\n\nObjective\nTo evaluate the effects of community-based parental education/counseling when combined with usual treatment on children s anemia cure rate.\n\n\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\nA pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial in children aged 12 to 59 months from 55 villages from the rural Chamrajnagar district in southern India was conducted between November 2014 and July 2015; 6-month follow-up ended in January 2016. Villages were randomly assigned to either usual treatment (n\u2009=\u200927) or to the intervention (n\u2009=\u200928). Among 1144 participating children, 534 were diagnosed as having anemia (hemoglobin levels <11g/dL and >7.9g/dL; to convert to grams per liter, multiply by 10) and constituted the study sample in this analysis. Data were analyzed between July 2016 and September 2017.\n\n\nInterventions\nIron and folic acid (IFA), 20 mg/d, 5 times daily per week, for 5 months (usual treatment) or health worker-delivered education/counseling combined with usual treatment (intervention).\n\n\nMain Outcomes and Measures\nThe primary outcome was anemia cure rate defined as hemoglobin level at or greater than 11 g/dL during follow-up.\n\n\nResults\nOf the children included in the study, the mean age was 30 months, with a slightly higher ratio of boys to girls. Of 534 children with anemia (intervention n\u2009=\u2009303; usual treatment n\u2009=\u2009231), 517 were reassessed after 6 months (intervention n\u2009=\u2009298; usual treatment n\u2009=\u2009219) while 17 were lost to follow-up (intervention n\u2009=\u20095 and usual treatment n\u2009=\u200912). Anemia cure rate was higher in children in the intervention group compared with children receiving usual treatment (55.7% [n\u2009=\u2009166 of 298] vs 41.4% [n\u2009=\u200990 of 219]). The risk ratio derived through multilevel logistic regression was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.04-1.70); the model-estimated risk difference was 15.1% (95% CI, 3.9-26.3). Intervention-group children demonstrated larger mean hemoglobin increments (difference, intervention vs control: 0.25 g/dL; 95% CI, 0.07-0.44 g/dL) and improved IFA adherence (61.7%; 95% CI, 56.2-67.3 vs 48.4%; 95% CI, 41.7-55.1 consumed >75% of tablets provided). Adverse events were mild (intervention: 26.8%; 95% CI, 21.8-31.9 vs usual treatment: 21%; 95% CI, 15.6-26.4). To cure 1 child with anemia, 7 mothers needed to be counseled (number needed to treat: 7; 95% CI, 4-26).\n\n\nConclusions and Relevance\nParental education and counseling by a community health worker achieved perceivable gains in curing childhood anemia. Policy makers should consider this approach to enhance population level anemia control.\n\n\nTrial Registration\nISRCTN identifier: ISRCTN68413407.